Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design science in information systems research

  • WI-Literatur
  • Für Sie gelesen
  • Published:
WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Aalst, W.; Kumar, A.: XML-Based Schema Definition for Support of Interorganizational Workflow. In: Information Systems Research 14 (2003) 1, S. 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banville, C.; Landry, M.: Can the Field of MIS be Disciplined. In: Galliers, R. (Hrsg.): Information Systems Research: Issues, Methods and Practical Guidelines, Bd. 1992. Balckwell, London et al. 1992, S. 61–88.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bennis, W.G.; O’Toole, J.: How Business Schools Lost Their Way. In: Harvard Business Review (2005) May, S. 96-104.

  4. Benbasat, I.; Zmud, R.W.: The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline’s Core Properties. In: MIS Quarterly 27 (2003) 2, S. 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Broy, M.; Schmidt, J.W.: Informatik: Grundlagenwissenschaft oder Ingenieurdisziplin? (Zur Diskussion Gestellt). In: Informatik Spektrum 22 (1999) 3, S. 206–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Farhoomand, A.F.: Scientific Progress of Management Information Systems. In: Galliers, R. (Hrsg.): Information Systems Research: Issues, Methods and Practical Guidelines. Blackwell, London et al. 1992, S. 28–60.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frank, U.: Für Sie gelesen: IS Research Relevance Revisited: Subtle Accomplishment, Unfulfilled Promise or Serial Hypocrisy? In: Wirtschaftsinformatik 45 (2003) 3, S. 354–357.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gavish, B.; Gerdes, J.: Anonymous mechanisms in Group Decision Support Systems Communication. In: 23 4 (1998) 297-328.

  9. GI;WKWI: Rahmenempfehlung für die Universitätsausbildung in Wirtschaftsinformatik. Techn. Ber., Gesellschaft für Informatik, Wissenschaftliche Kommission Wirtschaftsinformatik, 2003.

  10. Glass, R.L.: Rigor vs. Relevance: A Practitioner’s Eye View of An Explosion of Opinions. In: Communication of the AIS 6 (2001) 2.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hevner, A.R.; March, S.T.; Park, J. et al.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. In: MIS Quarterly 28 (2004) 1, S. 75–105.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jennex, M.E.: Research Relevance-You Get What You Reward. In: Communication of the AIS 6 (2001).

  13. Khazanchi, D.; Munkvold, B.E.: Is Information Systems a Science? An Inquiry into the Nature of the Information Systems Discipline. In: The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 31 (2000) 3, S. 24–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kock, N.; Gray, P.; Hoving, R. et al.: IS Research Relevance Revisited:Subtle Accomplishment, Unfulfilled Promise, or Serial Hypocrisy? In: Communication of the AIS 8 (2002), S. 330–346.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Markus, M.L.; Majchrazak, A.; Gasser, L.: A Design Theory for Systems that Support Emergent Knowledge Processes. In: MIS Quarterly 26 (2002) 3, S. 179–212.

    Google Scholar 

  16. March, S.T.; Smith, G.: Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. In: Decision Support Systems 15 (1995) 4, S. 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mertens, P.: Wirtschaftsinformatik-Von den Moden zum Trend. In: König, W. (Hrsg.): Wirtschaftsinformatik’ 95 1995.

  18. Nunamaker, J.; Chen, M.; Purdin, T.: Systems development in Information systems research. In: Journal of Management Information Systems 7 (1991) 3, S. 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schinzel, B.: Be-Deutungen der Informatik als Ingenieurswissenschaft. In: Zeitschrift für Kommunikationsökologie (2001) 3, S. 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial. 3. Aufl., MIT Press 1996.

  21. Venkatesh, V.: Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. In: Information Systems Research 11 (2000) 4, S. 342–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zmud, R.W.: Editor’s Comments. In: MIS Quarterly 21 (1997) 2, S. xxi–xxii.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. TU München Fakultät für Informatik, Lehrstuhl für Internetbasierte Geschäftssysteme (IBIS), Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748, Garching bei München, Germany

    Martin Bichler

Authors
  1. Martin Bichler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bichler, M. Design science in information systems research. Wirtsch. Inform. 48, 133–135 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-006-0028-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-006-0028-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation