Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risk communication and sustainability science: lessons from the field

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustainability science aims to help societies across the globe address the increased environmental and health crises and risks that range from poverty to climate change to health pandemics. With the increased magnitude and frequency of these large-scale risks to different societies, scientists and institutions have increasingly recognized the need for improved communication and collaboration among researchers, governments, businesses, and communities. This article argues that risk communication has fundamentally important contributions to make to sustainability science’s mission to create use-inspired, “actionable science” that can lead to solutions. Risk communication research can advance the mission of sustainability science to engage a wide range of stakeholders. This kind of engagement is especially important in the context of addressing sustainability problems that are characterized by high levels of uncertainty and complexity. We introduce three core tenets of risk communication research that are fundamental to advancing sustainability science. Risk communication specifically offers an increased understanding of how system feedbacks, human perceptions, and levels of uncertainty influence the study and design of solutions within social ecological systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aeberhard A, Rist S (2009) Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge in the development of organic agriculture in Switzerland. Ecol Econ 68(4):1171–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babrow AS, Kline KN (2000) From reducing to coping with uncertainty: reconceptualizing the central challenge in breast self-exams. Soc Sci Med 51(12):1805–1816. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00112-X.

  • Bang M, Medin DL, Atran S (2007) Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(35):13868–13874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage Publications, London

  • Beer T, Ismail-Zadeh A, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Scientific Affairs Division (2003) Risk science and sustainability: Science for reduction of risk and sustainable development of society. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

  • Benhabib S (2002) The claims of culture: equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Boholm Å (2009) Speaking of risk: matters of context. Environ Commun 3(3):335–354. doi:10.1080/17524030903230132

    Google Scholar 

  • Brashers DE (2001) Communication and uncertainty management. J Commun 51(3):477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrill JG, Oravec CL (1996) The symbolic earth: discourse and our creation of the environment. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Young O (2006a) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):181–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash DW, Borck JC, Patt AG (2006b) Countering the loading-dock approach to linking science and decision making: comparative analysis of El Nino/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecasting systems. Sci Technol Human Values 31(4):465–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins SL, Carpenter SR, Swinton SM, Orenstein DE, Childers DL, Gragson TL, Grim NB (2011) An integrated conceptual framework for long-term social ecological research. Front Ecol Environ 9(6):351–357. doi:10.1890/100068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corvello V, Sandman P (2001) Risk communication: evolution and revolution. In: Wolbarst A (ed) Solutions to an environment in Peril. Balitmore University Press, Baltimore, pp 164–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox R (2007) Nature’s “crisis disciplines”: does environmental communication have an ethical duty? Environ Commun 1(1):5–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox R (2010) Environmental communication and the public sphere, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

  • Ellis S, Shpielberg N (2003) Organizational learning mechanisms and managers, perceived uncertainty. Human Relat 56(10):1233–1254. doi:10.1177/00187267035610004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff B (2012). Risk analysis and human behavior. Earthscan, Abingdon

  • Fischhoff B, Kadvany JD (2011) Risk: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockstrom J (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability, and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4):20

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester J, Nilsson M, Lee C, Moora H, Persson A, Persson L, Peterson K, Simon J, Tuhkanen H (2009) Getting to policy impact: lessons from 20 years of bridging science and policy with sustainability knowledge. SEI research report. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hom AG, Plaza RM, Palmen R (2011) The framing of risk and implications for policy and governance: the case of EMF. Publ Underst Sci 20(3):319–333. doi:10.1177/0963662509336712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academies (1989) Improving Risk Communication. The National Academies Press, USA

  • Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE (2001) SEI risk and vulnerability programme report 2001-01. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, Mooney H (2001) Sustain Sci. Science 292(5517):641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman J (2009) Advancing sustainability science: report on the international conference on sustainability science (ICSS) 2009. Sustain Sci 4(2):233–242. doi:10.1007/s11625-009-0088-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1(1):1–6. doi:10.1007/s11625-006-0007-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C (2009) Climate change in the American mind: American’s climate change beliefs, attitudes, policy preferences, and actions. Yale Project on Climate Change, and George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from: http://www.climatechangecommunication.org/images/files/Climate_Change_in_the_American_Mind.pdf

  • Lemos MC, Morehouse BJ (2005) The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Glob Environ Change Part A 15(1):57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenfeld LA, Hall DM, McGreavy B, Silka L, Hart D (2012) Creating a place for environmental communication research in sustainability science. Environ Commun 6(1):23–43. doi:10.1080/17524032.2011.640702

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Marrero T, Yarnal B (2010) Putting adaptive capacity into the context of people's lives: a case study of two flood-prone communities in Puerto Rico. Nat Hazards 52:277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni I, Pidgeon NF (2006) Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Clim Change 77(1/2):73–95. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNie EC (2007) Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Policy 10(1):17–38. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Wright D (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer. Chelsea Green Pub, White River Junction

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17(8):2145–2151. doi:10.2307/40061917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan MG (1992) Communicating risk to the public. Environ Sci Technol 26(11):2048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan G, Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, Atman CJ (2001) Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC, Dilling L (2007) Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet MC (2009) Communicating climate change: why frames matter to public engagement. Environment 51(2):514–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet MC, Mooney C (2007) Framing Science. Science 316(5821):56–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet M, Maibach E, Leiserowitz A (2011) Framing peak petroleum as a public health problem: audience research and participatory engagement in the United States. Am J Public Health 101(9):1620–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton T, Sias P, Brown S (2011) Experiencing and managing uncertainty in climate change. J Appl Commun Res 39(3):290–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA (2012) Socioenvironmental sustainability and actionable science. Bioscience 62(1):5–6. doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrings C (2006) Resilience and sustainable development. Environ Dev Econ 11:417–426. doi:10.1017/S1355770X06003020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson MN, Peterson JM, Peterson TR (2007) Moving toward sustainability: integrating social practice and material process. In: Sandler RD, Pezzullo PC (eds) Environmental justice and environmentalism: the social justice challenge to the environmental movement. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 189–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P (2003) The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke RA (2007) The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL (1984) The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl C (2008) From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environ Sci Policy 11(1):46–53. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammel C, Stagl S, Wilfing H (2007). Managing complex adaptive systems: a co-evolutionary perspective on natural resource management. Ecol Econ 63(1):9–21. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.014

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn O, Klinke A (2013) A framework of adaptive risk governance for urban planning. Sustainability 5(5):2036–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey SJ, West GR, Janikas MV (2004) Uncertainty in integrated regional models. Econ Syst Res 16(3):259–277. doi:10.1080/0953531042000239365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandman P (2003) Four kinds of risk communication. Synergist 26–27

  • Sarewitz D, Pielke RA (2007) The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environ Sci Policy 10(1):5–16. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang G, Smith A (2007) Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda. Environ Polit 16(4):584–603. doi:10.1080/09644010701419121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton R, United States, Congressional Budget Office (2009) Potential impacts of climate change in the United States. Congress of the U.S. For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O., Washington, D.C.

  • Shackley S, Wynne B (1996) Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: boundary-ordering devices and authority. Sci Technol Human Values 21(3):275–302. doi:10.1177/016224399602100302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin D, Tucker WT, Ferson S (2008) A frequency/consequence-based technique for visualizing and communicating uncertainty and perception of risk. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1128:63–77. doi:10.1196/annals.1399.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JW, Leahy JE, Anderson DH, Davenport MA (2013) Community/agency trust and public involvement in resource planning. Soc Nat Res 26(4):452–471. doi:10.1080/08941920.2012.678465

    Google Scholar 

  • STEPS Centre (2013). http://steps-centre.org/about/

  • Turner II B, Matson P, McCarthy J, Corell R, Christensen L, Eckley N, Hovelsrud-Broda G, Kasperson J, Kasperson R, Luers A, Martello M, Mathiesen S, Naylor R, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A, Selin H, Tyler N (2003a) Illustrating the coupled human–environment system for vulnerability analysis: three case studies. PNAS 100(14):8080–8085 (published ahead of print June 18, 2003). doi:10.1073/pnas.1231334100

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(14):8074–8079. doi:10.1073/pnas.1231335100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Kerkhoff L, Lebel L (2006) Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annu Rev Environ Res 31(1):445–477. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.31.102405.170850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel C, Moser SC, Kasperson RE, Dabelko GD (2007) Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: pathways, players, and partnerships. Glob Environ Change 17(3–4):349–364. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein MP, Turner RE, Ibanez C (2012). The global sustainability transition: it is more than changing lighting bulbs. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 9(1):4–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Welp M, de la Vega-Leinert A, Stoll-Kleemann S, Jaeger CC (2006) Science-based stakeholder dialogues: theories and tools. Glob Environ Change 16(2):170–181. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinn J (2008) Social theories of risk and uncertainty: an introduction. Blackwell Pub, Malden

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication and Journalism, The Margaret Chase Smith Policy Center, Maine’s Sustainability Solutions Initiative, University of Maine, York Village Building 4, Orono, ME, 04469, USA

    Laura Lindenfeld & Hollie M. Smith

  2. Edward R. Murrow College of Communication, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA

    Todd Norton & Natalie C. Grecu

Authors
  1. Laura Lindenfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hollie M. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Todd Norton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Natalie C. Grecu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hollie M. Smith.

Additional information

Handled by Richard Bawden, Systemic Development Institute, Australia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindenfeld, L., Smith, H.M., Norton, T. et al. Risk communication and sustainability science: lessons from the field. Sustain Sci 9, 119–127 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0230-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0230-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation