Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evidence for the prevalence of the sustainability concept in European corporate responsibility reporting

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper empirically examines the terminology used in the titles of corporate social responsibility (CSR)/sustainability reports in Europe. Our data supports the claim of the rise of the sustainability concept in corporate communication in comparison to other concepts. In detail this research analysed CSR/sustainability reports to support Matten and Moon’s [Acad Manage Rev 33(2):404–424, 2008] hypothesis regarding a recent European trend towards a more voluntary and explicit CSR practice. The second and main objective of the research was to describe statistically significant trends in the use of terms and concepts in CSR/sustainability reporting to better understand how European companies interpret CSR and sustainability and how they communicate it to their stakeholders. To this end, a content analysis was conducted on 329 CSR/sustainability reports from 50 leading European companies from Euro Stoxx 50 that were published between the beginning of online CSR/sustainability reporting in 1998 and 2010. Our data analysis clearly indicates that the use of social and environment-related terms occurred more frequently in the past and demonstrates the establishment of sustainability in corporate non-financial reporting. Based on the results of our empirical research, the final discussion explores the development and diffusion of the sustainability concept in both the academic and business fields and examines economic, environmental, and social implications. Different propositions are presented to explain the recent rise of the sustainability concept in European CSR/sustainability reporting, adding to the formation of sustainability as a concept and as a science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvesson M (2011) Organizational culture: meaning, discourse and identity. In: Ashkanasy NM, Wilderom CPM, Peterson MF (eds) The handbook of organizational culture and climate, Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 11–28

  • Ariansen P (1999) Sustainability, morality and future generations. In: Lafferty WM, Langhelle O (eds) Towards sustainable development: on the goals of development and the conditions of sustainability, St Martin’s, London, pp 84–96

  • Arvidsson S (2010) Communication of corporate social responsibility: a study of the views of management teams in large companies. J Bus Ethics 96:339–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage (2003) Corporate sustainability—an investor perspective. The Mays report. Retrieved 7 May 2010. http://deh.gov.au/industry/finance/publications/index.html

  • Baker S (2005) Sustainable development. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P, Clelland I (2004) Talking trash: legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Acad Manag J 47(1):93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carley K (1993) Coding choices for textual analysis: a comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociol Methodol 23:75–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard-Harribey L (2006) Corporate social responsibility as a new paradigm in the European policy: how CSR comes to legitimate the European regulation process. Corp Gov Int J Bus Soc 6:358–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Euro Stoxx (2011) Official web site. Retrieved 13 Sept 2011. http://www.stoxx.com/indices/index_information.html?symbol=SX5E

  • European Commission (2002) Communication from the Commission concerning corporate social responsibility: a business contribution to sustainable development. COM (2002) 347 (01), European Commission, Brussels

  • Fassin Y, Rossem AV, Buelens M (2011) Small-business owner-managers’ perceptions of business ethics and CSR-related concepts. J Bus Ethics 98:425–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flatz A (2003) Screening for sustainability. A case study of the Dow Jones sustainability index. In: Waage S (ed) Ants, Galileo, and Gandhi. Designing the future of business through nature, genius, and compassion. Greenleaf, Sheffield, pp 144–168

  • Freeman RE (2004) A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In: Beauchamp T, Bowie N (eds) Ethical theory and business. Pearson Education, London, pp 56–66

  • Frooman J (1999) Stakeholder influence strategies. Acad Manag Rev 24(2):191–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatto M (1995) Sustainability: is it a well defined concept? Ecol Appl 5(4):1181–1183

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RB (2001) Specification of sustainability-based environmental assessment decision criteria and implications for determining ‘significance’. In: Environmental Assessment Report 46 Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Research and Development Programme

  • Gray R, Kouhy R, Lavers S (1995) Corporate social and environmental reporting. A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Account Audit Account J 8(2):47–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer J, Bruno K (1996) Greenwash: the reality behind corporate environmentalism. Apex, New York

  • Grosskurth J, Rotmans J (2005) The scene model: getting a grip on sustainable development in policy making. Environ Dev Sustain 7:135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman L, Rubin R, Dhanda K (2007) The communication of corporate social responsibility: United States and European Union Multinational Corporations. Business Ethics 74:373–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiss S (2009) From implicit to explicit corporate social responsibility—institutional change as a fight for myths. Bus Ethics Q 19(3):433–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idowu SO (1989) Accountable to society. Pass Magazine, November:14–15

  • Idowu SO, Towler BA (2004) A comparative study of the contents of corporate social responsibility reports of UK companies. Manag Environ Qual Int J 15(4):420–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isenmann R (2006) Internet based communication. In: Jonker J, de Witte M (eds) Management models for CSR. Springer, Berlin, pp 247–256

  • Isenmann R, Bey C, Welter M (2007) Online reporting for sustainability issues. Bus Strategy Environ 16:487–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CE (2007) Ethics in the workplace: tools and tactics for organizational transformation. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajikawa Y (2008) Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustain Sci 3:215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karen P (2008) Corporate sustainability, citizenship and social responsibility reporting. J Corp Citizensh 32:63–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates R, Clark W, Corell R, Hall J, Jaeger C, Lowe I, McCarthy J, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson N, Faucheux S, Gallopin G, Grubler A, Huntley B, Jager J, Jodha N, Kasperson R, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H (2001) Sustain Sci 292(5517):641–642

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer SW, Barton P, Palmer AR, Reitan PH, Zen E (2003) Megascale events: natural disasters and human behavior. Geol Soc Am Abstr Progr 2003:432

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk A (2004) A decade of sustainability reporting: developments and significance. Int J Environ Sustain Dev 3(1):51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk A (2006) Sustainability reporting. VBA J 21:34–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG’s Global Sustainability Services and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (2006) Carrots and sticks for starters: Current trends and approaches in voluntary and mandatory standards for sustainability reporting. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-social-responsibility/reporting-disclosure/swedish-presidency/files/surveys_and_reports/carrots_and_sticks_-_kpmg_and_unep_en.pdf

  • Krippendorf K (1980) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan I, Ralston D (2002) Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: insights from businesses’ self-presentations. J Int Bus Stud 33:497–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens P (2006) Sustainability: science or fiction? Sustain Sci Pract Policy 2(1):36–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten D, Moon J (2008) “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 33(2):404–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell LD, Ramey WD (2011) Look how green I am! An individual-level explanation for greenwashing. J Appl Bus Econ 12(6):40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Montiel I (2008) Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability. Organ Manag 21(3):245–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen AE, Thomsen C (2007) Reporting CSR—what and how to say it. Corp Commun Int J 12(1):25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Othman S, Darus F, Arshad R (2011) The influence of coercive isomorphism on corporate social responsibility reporting and reputation 7(1):118–135

  • Palazzo B (2005) Interkulturelle Unternehmensethik. Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Palenberg M, Reinicke W, Witte J (2006) Trends in non-financial reporting. Global Public Policy Institute, Berlin, pp 3–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmquist ME, Carley KM, Dale TA (1997) Two applications of automated text analysis: analyzing literary and non-literary texts. In: Roberts C (ed) Text analysis for the social sciences: methods for drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Panwar R, Rinne T, Hansen E, Juslin H (2006) Corporate legitimacy as deliberation. A communicative framework. J Bus Ethics 66:71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman S (2011) Evaluation of definitions: ten dimensions of corporate social responsibility. World Rev Bus Res 1(1):166–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimmer L (2005) BAT in its own words. Retrieved 23 September 2011. http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/reports/bat2005.pdf

  • Robbins SS, Stylianou AC (2002) A study of cultural differences in global corporate website. J Comput Inform Syst 42:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolland D, Bazzoni J O’K (2009) Greening corporate identity: CSR online corporate identity reporting. Corp Commun Int J 14(3):249–263

  • Russo MV, Harrison NS (2005) Organizational design and environmental performance clues from the electronics industry. Acad Manag J 48(4):582–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer AG, Palazzo G, Seidl D (2013) Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: sustainable development in a globalized world. J Manage Stud 50(2):259–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sison AJG (2009) From CSR to corporate citizenship: anglo-American and continental European perspectives. J Bus Ethics 89:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STOXX Limited web page (2011). Retrieved 6 July 2011. http://www.stoxx.com/indices/index_information.html?symbol=SX5E

  • van Marrewijk M (2003) Concepts and definitions of csr and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion. J Bus Ethics 44:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van. Zeijl-Rozema A, Cörvers R, Kemp R, Martens P (2008) Governance for sustainable development: a framework. Sustain Dev 16(6):410–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker K, Wan F (2012) The harm of symbolic actions an green-washing: corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. J Bus Ethics 109:227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, London

  • Yarime M, Trencher G, Mino T, Scholz RW, Olsson L, Ness B, Frantzeskaki N, Rotmans J (2012) Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations. Sustain Sci 7(1):101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Lugano, Via Giuseppe Buffi 13, 6904, Lugano, Switzerland

    Lucia Gatti & Peter Seele

Authors
  1. Lucia Gatti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Seele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Seele.

Additional information

Handled by Joanne Kauffman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) (Retired), France.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gatti, L., Seele, P. Evidence for the prevalence of the sustainability concept in European corporate responsibility reporting. Sustain Sci 9, 89–102 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0233-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0233-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation