Skip to main content
Log in

Microstructural, compositional, and microhardness variations across a gas-metal arc weldment made with an ultralow-carbon consumable

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experimental gas-metal arc (GMA) weldment of HSLA-100 steel fabricated with an ultralowcarbon (ULC) consumable of interest for United States Navy applications, designated “ARC100,” was studied to determine the relationships among the microstructure, the solute redistributions at various positions across the weldment, and the local properties (microhardness). These relationships were investigated by a variety of techniques, including microhardness mapping, optical microscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) (including compositional X-ray mapping), and parallel electron energy-loss spectroscopy (PEELS). The microconstituents observed in this weld include lath ferrite, degenerate ferrite, lath martensite, retained austenite, and oxide inclusions; no carbides or other solid-state precipitates are present within the weld metal. Microhardness mapping indicates an undermatched weld metal (lower hardness as compared to the base plate) in which the hardest regions are in the first and last top beads, the root passes, and between highly ferritic soft bands associated with the outer portion of each weld bead’s heat-affected zone (HAZ) (within the fusion zone). The majority of the gradient in the substitutional alloying elements (Ni, Cu, Mn, and Cr) occurs within a region of less than about 0.5 mm of the fusion boundary, but the composition still changes even well into the fusion zone. Appreciable segregation of Ni and Cu to solidification cell boundaries occurs, and there is appreciable enrichment of C, Ni, Cu, and Mn in thin films of interlath retained austenite. This ULC weld metal is softer than the base plate due to the preponderance of lath ferrite rather than lath martensite, even at the high cooling rates experienced in this low-heat-input weld. Alternatively, the strength of the weld metal is due to the presence of at least some untempered lath martensite and the fact that the majority of the ferrite is lath ferrite and not polygonal ferrite. The interlath retained austenite might enhance toughness, but might also serve as a source of hydrogen in solution, which could potentially contribute to hydrogen-assisted cracking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.J. Deloach, Jr.: in Welding and Weld Automation in Shipbuilding, R. Dinale, ed., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1996, pp. 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E.J. Czyryca, R.E. Link, R.J. Wong, D.A. Aylor, T.W. Montemarano, and J.P. Gudas: Nav. Eng. J., 1990, vol. 102 (3), pp. 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Spanos, D.W. Moon, R.W. Fonda, E.S.K. Menon, and A.G. Fox: Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Trends in Welding Research, ASM INTERNATIONAL, Metals Park, OH, 1999, pp. 191–96.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.W. Brewer, K.A. Erven, and G. Krauss: Mater. Characterization, 1991, vol. 27, pp. 53–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. “Standard Test Method for Microhardness of Materials,” ASTM Designation: E384–84, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1989, vol. 03.01, pp. 469–83.

  6. R.W. Fonda, G. Spanos, and R.A. Vandermeer: Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Trends in Welding Research, ASM INTERNATIONAL, Metals Park, OH, 1996, pp. 277–82.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.W. Moon, R.W. Fonda, and G. Spanos: Welding J. Res. Suppl., 2000, vol. 79 (10), pp. 278s-285s.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.C. Ion, K.E. Easterling, and M.F. Ashby: Acta Metall., 1984, vol. 32, pp. 1949–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. R.W. Fonda, G. Spanos, and R.A. Vandermeer: Scripta Metall., 1994, vol. 31, pp. 683–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Homa, S. Ohita, S. Matsuda, and K. Yamamoto: Welding J. Res. Suppl., 1987, Oct., pp. 301s–309s.

  11. P.G. Boswell, K.R. Kinsman, G.J. Shiflet, and H.I. Aaronson: Mechanical Properties and Phase Transformations in Engineering Materials, S.D. Antolovich, R.O. Richie, and W.W. Berberich, eds., TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1986, pp. 445–66.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.T. Tsubikino and H.I. Aaronson: Metall. Trans. A, 1987, vol. 18A, pp. 2047–60.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P.L. Harrison, M.N. Watson, and R.A. Farrar: Welding Metal Fabrication, 1981, Apr., pp. 161–69.

  14. R.W. Fonda and G. Spanos: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2000, vol. 31A, pp. 2145–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. R.W. Fonda and G. Spanos: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2000, in press.

  16. D.J. Abson and R.E. Dolby: Weld. Inst. Res. Bull., 1980, vol. 21 (4), pp. 100–03; IIW Doc. No. IXJ-29-80.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. Spanos, R.W. Fonda, R.A. Vandermeer, and A. Matuszeski: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1995, vol. 26A, pp. 3277–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spanos, G., Moon, D.W., Fonda, R.W. et al. Microstructural, compositional, and microhardness variations across a gas-metal arc weldment made with an ultralow-carbon consumable. Metall Mater Trans A 32, 3043–3054 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-001-0179-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-001-0179-6

Keywords

Navigation