Abstract
The effects of prestrain on the ductile fracture behavior of two varieties of Cu-strengthened high-strength low-alloy (HSLA) steels have been investigated through stretch-zone geometry measurements. It is noted that the ductile fracture-initiation toughness of both the steels remained unaltered up to prestrains of ∼2 pct, beyond which the toughness decreased sharply. A methodology for estimating the stretch-zone dimensions is proposed. Fracture-toughness estimations through stretch-zone width (SZW) and stretch-zone depth (SZD) measurements revealed that the nature of the variation of ductile fracture toughness with prestrain can be better predicted through SZD rather than the SZW measurements. However, for the specimen geometries and prestrain levels that were investigated, none of these methods were found suitable for quantifying the initiation fracture toughness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S.W. Yin and R.A. Gerbrands: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1983, vol. 18, pp. 1025–36.
P. Hopkins and G. Jolley: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1983, vol. 18, pp. 239–42.
V.R. Ranganath, A.N. Kumar, and R.K. Pandey: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1991, vol. 132, pp. 153–60.
K.F. Amouzouvi and M.N. Bassim: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1982, vol. 55, pp. 257–62.
R.K. Pandey, S. Sundaram, and A.N. Kumar: J. Test. Eval., 1992, vol. 20, pp. 106–13.
M. Srinivas, S.V. Kamat, and P. Rama Rao: J. Test. Eval., 1994, vol. 22, pp. 302–8.
M.N. Bassim, J.R. Mathews, and C.V. Hyatt: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1992, vol. 43, pp. 297–303.
J. Heerans, K.H. Schwalbe, and A. Cornec: Fracture Mechanics: 18th Symp., ASTM STP 945, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1988, pp. 374–89.
P.R. Sreenivasan, S.K. Ray, S. Vaidyanathan, and P. Rodriguez: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1996, vol. 19, pp. 855–68.
Wei-Di Cao and Xiao-Ping Lu: Int. J. Fract., 1984, vol. 25, pp. 33–52.
Y. Kasai and N. Uehara: Proc. USA-Japan Joint Seminar, H.W. Liu, T. Kunio, V. Weiss, and H. Okamura, eds., Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Hyama, Japan, 1981, pp. 199–208.
S. Sivaprasad, S. Tarafder, V.R. Ranganath, and K.K. Ray: J. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2000, vol. A284, pp. 195–201.
E.J. Czyryca, R.E. Link, R.J. Wong, D.A. Aylor, T.W. Montemarano, and J.P. Gudas: Naval Eng. J, 1990, vol. 102, pp. 63–82.
T.W. Montemarano, B.P. Sack, J.P. Gudas, M.G. Vassilaros, and H.H. Vanderveldt: J. Ship Prod., 1986, vol. 3, pp. 145–62.
[E 1737-96,] Standard Test Method for J Integral Characterization of Fracture Toughness, ASTM STP Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1996, vol. 03.01, pp. 968–91.
M. Tarafder, S. Tarafder, and V.R. Ranganath: Int. J. Fatigue, 1997, vol. 19, pp. 635–40.
C. Lipson and N.J. Sheth: Statistical Design and Analysis of Engineering Experiments, International Student ed., McGraw-Hill, Kogakusha, 1973, pp. 29–30 and 264–66.
[E 1290-93,] Standard Test Method for Crack Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD) Fracture Toughness Measurement, ASTM STP Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1994, vol. 03.01, pp. 846–55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sivaprasad, S., Tarafder, S., Ranganath, V.R. et al. Effect of prestrain on stretch-zone formation during ductile fracture of Cu-strengthened high-strength low-alloy steels. Metall Mater Trans A 33, 3731–3740 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-002-0245-8
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-002-0245-8