Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Interface Bonding on the Residual Stresses in Cold-Sprayed Al-6061: A Numerical Investigation

  • Peer Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Spray Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A contact model that accounts for interfacial cohesion and thermal conduction is developed to investigate the influence of bonding on the final residual stresses build-up in cold spray. The residual stress evolution in the cold-sprayed Al-6061 coating on an Al-6061 substrate is investigated via three-dimensional single-particle and multi-particle impact simulations. It is shown that the interface bonding mainly affects the local residual stress distribution near the interfaces. The residual stresses are largely due to the kinetic peening and bonding effects. The thermal cooling has negligible influence. In general, this work finds that peening introduces compressive stress, while bonding causes relaxation. The balance between the peening and the bonding effects, which depends strongly on the local bonding environment, determines the final residual stress in the system. This work suggests that the interface bonding should be considered as one of the essential factors in numerical modeling of the residual stresses evolution in cold spray.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Assadi, F. Gärtner, T. Stoltenhoff, and H. Kreye, Bonding Mechanism in Cold Gas Spraying, Acta Mater., 2003, 51, p 4379-4394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Schmidt, F. Gärtner, H. Assadi, and H. Kreye, Development of a Generalized Parameter Window for Cold Spray Deposition, Acta Mater., 2006, 54, p 729-742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Ghelichi, D. MacDonald, S. Bagherifard, H. Jahed, M. Guagliano, and B. Jodoin, Microstructure and Fatigue Behavior of Cold Spray Coated Al5052, Acta Mater., 2012, 60, p 6555-6561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C.W. Ziemian, M.M. Sharma, B.D. Bouffard, T. Nissley, and T.J. Eden, Effect of Substrate Surface Roughening and Cold Spray Coating on the Fatigue Life of AA2024 Specimens, Mater. Des. (1980-2015), 2014, 54, p 212-221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Z. Arabgol, H. Assadi, T. Schmidt, F. Gärtner, and T. Klassen, Analysis of Thermal History and Residual Stress in Cold-Sprayed Coatings, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2014, 23, p 84-90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Suhonen, T. Varis, S. Dosta, M. Torrell, and J.M. Guilemany, Residual Stress Development in Cold Sprayed Al, Cu and Ti Coatings, Acta Mater., 2013, 61, p 6329-6337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M.R. Rokni, C.A. Widener, O.C. Ozdemir, and G.A. Crawford, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Cold Sprayed 6061 Al in As-Sprayed and Heat Treated Condition, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2017, 309, p 641-650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Shayegan, H. Mahmoudi, R. Ghelichi, J. Villafuerte, J. Wang, M. Guagliano et al., Residual Stress Induced by Cold Spray Coating of Magnesium AZ31B Extrusion, Mater. Des., 2014, 60, p 72-84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. V. Luzin, K. Spencer, and M.X. Zhang, Residual Stress and Thermo-mechanical Properties of Cold Spray Metal Coatings, Acta Mater., 2011, 59, p 1259-1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Spencer, V. Luzin, N. Matthews, and M.X. Zhang, Residual Stresses in Cold Spray Al Coatings: The Effect of Alloying and of Process Parameters, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2012, 206, p 4249-4255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Rech, A. Trentin, S. Vezzù, J.-G. Legoux, E. Irissou, and M. Guagliano, Influence of Pre-Heated Al 6061 Substrate Temperature on the Residual Stresses of Multipass Al Coatings Deposited by Cold Spray, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2011, 20, p 243-251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Saleh, V. Luzin, and K. Spencer, Analysis of the Residual Stress and Bonding Mechanism in the Cold Spray Technique Using Experimental and Numerical Methods, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2014, 252, p 15-28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Ghelichi, S. Bagherifard, D. MacDonald, I. Fernandez-Pariente, B. Jodoin, and M. Guagliano, Experimental and Numerical Study of Residual Stress Evolution in Cold Spray Coating, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 288, p 26-33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. W. Li, K. Yang, D. Zhang, and X. Zhou, Residual Stress Analysis of Cold-Sprayed Copper Coatings by Numerical Simulation, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2016, 25, p 131-142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ABAQUS/CAE User’s Manual: Version 6.13 (ABAQUS, Pawtucket, 2012)

  16. O.C. Ozdemir, C.A. Widener, D. Helfritch, and F. Delfanian, Estimating the Effect of Helium and Nitrogen Mixing on Deposition Efficiency in Cold Spray, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2016, 25, p 660-671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. G.R. Johnson and W.H. Cook, A Constitutive Model and Data for Metals Subjected to Large Strains, High Strain Rates, and High Temperatures, in Proceedings 7th International Symposium on Ballistics (1983), pp. 541-547

  18. A. Alizadeh Dehkharghani, Tuning Johnson–Cook Material Model Parameters for Impact of High Velocity, Micron Scale Aluminum Particles. Master Thesis (Northeastern University, Boston, 2016)

  19. W. Xie, A. Alizadeh-Dehkharghani, Q. Chen, V.K. Champagne, X. Wang, A.T. Nardi et al., Dynamics and Extreme Plasticity of Metallic Microparticles in Supersonic Collisions, Sci. Rep., 2017, 7, p 5073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M.A. Meyers, Plastic Deformation at High Strain Rates. Dynamic Behavior of Materials, Wiley, New York, 2007, p 323-381

    Google Scholar 

  21. JAHM Software Inc., Material Properties Database. MPDB (2003); V7.01 demo

  22. B. Yildirim, S. Muftu, and A. Gouldstone, Modeling of High Velocity Impact of Spherical Particles, Wear, 2011, 270, p 703-713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. G.R. Johnson and W.H. Cook, Fracture Characteristics of Three Metals Subjected to Various Strains, Strain Rates, Temperatures and Pressures, Eng. Fract. Mech., 1985, 21, p 31-48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Manes, D. Lumassi, L. Giudici, and M. Giglio, An Experimental-Numerical Investigation on Aluminium Tubes Subjected to Ballistic Impact with Soft Core 7.62 Ball Projectiles, Thin Walled Struct., 2013, 73, p 68-80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Hassani-Gangaraj, D. Veysset, K.A. Nelson, and C.A. Schuh, In-Situ Observations of Single Micro-particle Impact Bonding, Scr. Mater., 2018, 145, p 9-13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. V.V. Bulatov, B.W. Reed, and M. Kumar, Grain Boundary Energy Function for FCC Metals, Acta Mater., 2014, 65, p 161-175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. B. Yildirim, H. Fukanuma, T. Ando, A. Gouldstone, and S. Müftü, A Numerical Investigation Into Cold Spray Bonding Processes, J. Tribol., 2014, 137, p 011102-011113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Müftü, S. Zhalehpour, A. Gouldstone, and T. Ando, Assessment of Interface Energy in High Velocity Particle Impacts, in 38th Annual Meeting of The Adhesion Society. Savannah, GA (2015)

  29. B.M. Gabriel, V.K. Champagne, P.F. Leaman, and D.J. Helfritch, Cold Spray for Repair of Magnesium Components. Army Research Library Report No ARL-TR-6629 (2013)

  30. S. Kikuchi, Y. Hirota, and J. Komotori, Effects of Particle Size for Peening on Microstructural Changes in Steel, J. Jpn. Soc. Abras. Technol., 2010, 54, p 720-724

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was sponsored in part by the Army Research Laboratories under the Grant Number W911NF-15-2-0026. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the US Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Enqiang Lin or Sinan Müftü.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 53 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

The proposed surface contact model (Fig. 3) is implemented in ABAQUS/Explicit through a user subroutine VUINTERACTION. To verify the implementation, the separation-traction history for the contact pair between south pole of the particle and center point of the substrate in the cohesive region (δn > 0) is monitored throughout the single-particle impact simulation, as shown in Fig. S1. Each black circle in Fig. S1 represents the separation-traction relationship at the monitored simulation time step. It is clearly seen that the traction follows the assumed bilinear cohesive behaviors with δn, as expected. The values of the monitored cohesive stiffness kcoh = 1011 MPa/mm, cohesive strength σ0 = 325 MPa and cohesive damage energy G = 1.0 J/m2 are exactly the same as those that are input to the code (listed in Table 1). In Fig. S1, it is also seen that after the onset of cohesive damage (\(\sigma_{t}^{n} > \sigma_{0}\) or δn > δnc), the traction follows the degraded kcoh to load and unloading with δn until its final failure.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, E., Chen, Q., Ozdemir, O.C. et al. Effects of Interface Bonding on the Residual Stresses in Cold-Sprayed Al-6061: A Numerical Investigation. J Therm Spray Tech 28, 472–483 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-019-00827-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-019-00827-7

Keywords

Navigation