Skip to main content
Log in

Improvement in Quality of Life After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Few studies have investigated changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in surgical patients who have undergone a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Prospective data were obtained from 78 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG; mean age, 42.4 years; mean body weight, 131 kg; mean body mass index (BMI), 47 kg/m2 (24.4% of superobese patients)). Two HRQOL questionnaires were administered preoperatively and 12 months postsurgery: the generic Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 and the weight-specific IWQOL-Lite questionnaire. Excess weight loss at 12 months was 57.18%. No mortality was recorded. HRQOL scores revealed a significant improvement in all areas of both questionnaires. However, changes in HRQOL were not associated consistently with amount of weight loss. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is an effective and safe procedure, with positive changes in health-related quality of life as well as weight reduction. A fruitful area for future research is the investigation of long-term changes in HRQOL after LSG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Laboratoire ROCHE Enquête ObEpI2006 L’obésité et le surpoids en France—Dossier de presse. 2011.

  2. Haute autorité de santé. Obésité: Rapport sur la prise en charge chirurgicale chez l’adulte. Saint-Denis La Plaine: HAS; 2009.

  3. Nocca D, Krawczykowsky D, Bomans B, et al. A prospective multicenter study of 163 sleeve gastrectomies: results at 1 and 2 years. Obes Surg. 2008;18(5):560–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Poghosyan T, Polliand C, Bernard K, et al. Qualité de vie des patients obèses relevant d’un traitement chirurgical comparée à celle d’une population témoin. J Chir. 2007;144(2):129–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Korolija D, Sauerland S, et al. Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc. 2003;18:879–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Gress RE, et al. Two-year changes in health-related quality of life in gastric bypass patients compared with severely obese controls. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(2):250–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Batsis JA, Lopez-Jimenez F, Collazo-Clavell ML, et al. Quality of life after bariatric surgery: a population-based cohort study. Am J Med. 2009;122(11):1055 e1051–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karlsson J, Taft C, Ryden A, et al. Ten-year trends in health-related quality of life after surgical and conventional treatment for severe obesity: the SOS intervention study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007;31(8):1248–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, et al. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dixon JB, Dixon ME, O'Brien PE. Quality of life after lap-band placement: influence of time, weight loss, and comorbidities. Obes Res. 2001;9(11):713–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Titi M, Jenkins JT, Modak P, et al. Quality of life and alteration in comorbidity following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(981):487–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oria HE. The BAROS and the Moorehead–Ardelt quality of life questionnaire. Obes Surg. 2003;13(6):965.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sabbagh C, Verhaeghe P, Dhahri A, et al. Two-year results on morbidity, weight loss and quality of life of sleeve gastrectomy as first procedure, sleeve gastrectomy after failure of gastric banding and gastric banding. Obesity Surgery. 2009.

  14. Moorehead MK, Ardelt-Gattinger E, Lechner H, et al. The validation of the Moorehead–Ardelt quality of life questionnaire II. Obes Surg. 2003;13(5):684–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tarlov AR, Ware JE. The medical outcomes study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA. 1989;262(7):925–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD. Psychometric evaluation of the impact of weight on quality of life-lite questionnaire in a community sample. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:157–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Haute Autorité de Santé—Gastrectomie longitudinale pour obésité—Avis sur l’acte Février. 2008. p. 9.

  18. Sears D, Fillmore G, Bui M, et al. Evaluation of gastric bypass patients 1 year after surgery: changes in quality of life and obesity-related conditions. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1522–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mathus-Vliegen EMH, de Wit LT. Health-related quality of life after gastric banding. Br J Surg. 2007;94:457–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Torquati A, Lutfi RE, Rochards WO. Predictors of early quality-of-life improvement after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. Am J Surg. 2007;193:471–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kinzl J, Schrattenecker M, Traweger C, et al. Quality of life in morbidly obese patients after surgical weight loss. Obes Surg. 2007;17:229–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Dr. Nocca is a consultant for Ethicon Endosurgery and Tutogen Medical.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Nocca.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fezzi, M., Kolotkin, R.L., Nedelcu, M. et al. Improvement in Quality of Life After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. OBES SURG 21, 1161–1167 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0361-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0361-x

Keywords

Navigation