Skip to main content
Log in

An overview of preliminary studies on the development of doubled haploid protocols for nutraceutical species

  • Review
  • Published:
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is very little activity underway to improve the genetics of herbs, spices, and nutraceutical crops. Much of the industry relies on the harvest of “wild” plants; therefore, the potential for variability in performance and active ingredients is high. This presents significant challenges for an industry that is striving to achieve market credibility and meet current regulatory standards. Uniform varieties would also be beneficial for use in clinical trials. The development of plants performing consistently in cultivation under various environmental conditions and producing a stable quality and quantity of desired active ingredients cannot solely rely on traditional plant breeding, but must be supported by the development of tissue culture methods targeted to the species of interest.

We have screened over 80 herb, spice, and nutraceutical species for microspore culture response using the Brassica napus microspore culture protocol. The majority of the species did not respond. Swelling and initial divisions of the microspores were observed in some species. Embryogenesis, however, was observed in the Apiaceae and the Caryophyllaceae. Species within these families were selected for further optimization.

Improvements in embryogenic frequency were observed in both families. Haploid and doubled haploid plants have been regenerated in anise (Pimpinella anisum), carrot (Daucus carota), caraway (Carum carvi), dill (Anethum graveolens), fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), lovage (Levisticum officinale), laceflower (Amni majus), parsnip (Petroselinum crispum), and cow cockle (Saponaria vaccaria).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen Y., Kenaschuk E., Dribnenki P. 1998. High frequency of plant regeneration from anther culture in flax. Plant Breed. 117: 463–467.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrie A.M.R., Keller W.A. 1995. Microspore culture for haploid plant production. In: Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. Fundamental methods, ed. by O.L. Gamborg and G.C. Phillips. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg O.L., Miller R.A., Ojima K. 1968. Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50: 151–158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiramatsu M., Odahara K., Matsue Y. 1995. A survey of microspore embryogenesis in leaf mustard (Brassica juncea). Acta Horticulturae 392: 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernan Z., Ferrie A.M.R. 2005. Microspore embryogenesis and the development of a double haploidy protocol for cow cockle (Saponaria vaccaria). Plant Cell Rep. (in press - DOI: 10.1007/s00299-005-0064-7).

  • Laurain D., Trémouillaux-Guiller J., Chénieux J. 1993. Embryogenesis from microspores of Ginkgo biloba L., a medicinal woody species. Plant Cell Rep. 12: 501–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter R. 1982. Induction of haploid plants from isolated pollen of Brassica napus. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 105: 427–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maluszynski M., Kasha K.J., Forster B.P., Szarejko I. 2003. Doubled Haploid Production in Crop Plants: A Manual. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 428 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messmer M., Berger K. 2004. Development of gametic embryogenesis for enhanced breeding progress in the medicinal plants Hypericum perforatum L. and Valeriana officinalis L. XVII Eucarpia Conference, Sept 8–11, 2004, Tulin, Austria

  • Mitykó J., Andrásfalvy A., Csilléry G., Fári M. 1995. Anther-culture response in different genotypes and F1 hybrids of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Plant Breeding 114: 78–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T., Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nichterlein K., Friedt W. 1993. Plant regeneration from isolated microspores of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.). Plant Cell Rep. 12: 426–430.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nichterlein K., Umbach H., Friedt W. 1991. Genotypic and exogenous factors affecting shoot regeneration from anther callus of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.). Euphytica 58: 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer C.E.D., Keller W.A. 2005. Challenges and limitations to the use of haploidy in crop improvement. In: Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 56: Haploids in Crop Improvements, ed. by C.E. Palmer, W.A. Keller, K.J. Kasha. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 295–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samsudden K., Babu K.N., Divakaran M., Ravindran P.N. 2000. Plant regeneration from anther derived callus cultures of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). J Hort. Sci. & Biotech. 75: 447–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathish P., Gamborg O.L., Nabors M.W. 1995. Rice anther culture: callus initiation and androclonal variation in progenies of regenerated plants. Plant Cell Rep. 14: 432–436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas W.T.B., Forster B.P., Gertsson B. 2003. Doubled Haploids in Breeding. In: Doubled Haploid Production in Crop Plants, A manual, ed. by M. Maluszynski, K.J. Kasha, B.P. Forster and I. Szarejko. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 337–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich A., Furton W.H., Downey R.K. 1984. Biotechnology and rapeseed breeding: Some economic considerations. Sci. Counc. Can. Rep. Ottawa, 67 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferrie, A.M.R., Bethune, T. & Kernan, Z. An overview of preliminary studies on the development of doubled haploid protocols for nutraceutical species. Acta Physiol Plant 27, 735–741 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-005-0078-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-005-0078-3

Key words

Navigation