Skip to main content
Log in

Community based feedback techniques to improve video search

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a novel approach to aid users in the difficult task of video search. We use a graph based model based on implicit feedback mined from the interactions of previous users of our video search system to provide recommendations to aid users in their search tasks. This approach means that users are not burdened with providing explicit feedback, while still getting the benefits of recommendations. The goal of this approach is to improve the quality of the results that users find, and in doing so also help users to explore a large and difficult information space. In particular we wish to make the challenging task of video search much easier for users. The results of our evaluation indicate that we achieved our goals, the performance of the users in retrieving relevant videos improved, and users were able to explore the collection to a greater extent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adcock, J., Pickens, J., Cooper, M., Anthony, L., Chen, F., Qvarfordt, P.: FXPAL interactive search experiments for TRECVID 2007. Paper presented at the 5th TREC Video Retrieval Evaluation (TRECVID) workshop, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 5–6 November 2007

  2. Bentley, F., Metcalf, C., Harboe, G.: Personal vs. commercial content: the similarities between consumer use of photos and music. In: Proc. SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, Montréal, Québec, Canada, pp. 667–676 (2006)

  3. Chang, S.-F., Manmatha, R., Chua, T.-S.: Combining text and audio-visual features in video indexing. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Philadelphia, USA, pp. 1005–1008 (2005)

  4. Christel, M.G., Conescu, R.M.: Mining novice user activity in TRECVID interactive retrieval tasks. In: Proc. International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval, Tempe, Arizona, USA, pp. 21–30 (2006)

  5. Christel, M.G.: Establishing the utility of non-text search for news video retrieval with real world users. In: Proc. ACM Multimedia, University of Augsburg, Germany, pp. 707–716 (2007)

  6. Craswell, N., Szummer, M.: Random walks on the click graph. In: Proc. Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, Amsterdam, pp. 239–246 (2007)

  7. Foley, E., Gurrin, C., Jones, G., Lee, H., McGivney, S., O’Connor, N.E., Sav, S., Smeaton, A.F., Wilkins, P.: TRECVid 2005 Experiments at Dublin City University. Paper presented at the 3th TREC Video Retrieval Evaluation (TRECVID) workshop, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 14–15 November 2007

  8. Freyne, J., Farzan, R., Brusilovsky, P., Smyth, B., Coyle, M.: Collecting community wisdom: integrating social search and social browsing. In: Proc. International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 52–61 (2007)

  9. Goldberg D., Nichols D., Oki B.M., Douglas T.: Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Commun. ACM. 35(12), 61–70 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Golder S.A., Huberman B.A.: Usage patterns in collaborative tagging systems. J. Inform. Sci. 32(2), 198–208 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Halvey, M., Keane, M.T.: Analysis of online video search and sharing. In: Proc. ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Manchester, UK, pp. 217–226 (2007)

  12. Hancock-Beaulieu M., Walker S.: An evaluation of automatic query expansion in an online library catalogue. J. Doc. 48(4), 406–421 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heesch, D., Howarth, P., Magalhaes, J., May, A., Pickering, M., Yavlinski, A., Rueger, S.: Video retrieval using search and browsing. Paper presented at the 13th Text REtrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 16–19 November 2007

  14. Hopfgartner, F., Urban, J., Villa, R., Jose, J.: Simulated testing of an adaptive multimedia information retrieval system. In: Proc. International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing, Bordeaux, France, pp. 328–335 (2007)

  15. Hopfgartner F.: Understanding video retrieval. VDM Verlag, (2007)

  16. Huang, C.-W.: Automatic Closed Caption Alignment Based on Speech Recognition Transcripts. Technical Report, University of Columbia (2003)

  17. Jaimes, A., Christel, M., Gilles, S., Ramesh, S., Ma, W.-Y.: Multimedia information retrieval: what is it, and why isn’t anyone using it? In: Proc. ACM SIGMM International Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval, Singapore, pp. 3–8 (2005)

  18. Kelly D., Teevan J.: Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: a bibliography. SIGIR Forum. 32(2), 18–28 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirk, D., Sellen, A., Rother, C., Wood, K.: Understanding photowork. In: Proc. SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, Montréal, Québec, Canada, pp. 761–770 (2006)

  20. Kirk, D., Sellen, A., Harper, R., Wood, K.: Understanding videowork. In: Proc. SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, San Jose, California, USA, pp. 61–70 (2007)

  21. Likert R.: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 140, 1–55 (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mei, T., Hua, X.-S., Yang, L., Yang, S.-Q., Li, S.: VideoReach: an online video recommendation system. In: Proc. Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, Seattle, WA, USA, pp. 767–768 (2006)

  23. Naphade M., Smith J.R., Tesic J., Chang J.-S., Hsu W., Kennedy L., Hauptmann A., Curtis J.: Large-scale ontology for multimedia. IEEE MultiMed. 13(3), 86–91 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. National Institute of Standards Technology.: NIST TREC Video retrieval Evaluation Online Proceedings. http://www-nlpir.nist.gov/projects/tvpubs/tv/pubs.org.html

  25. Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., Riedl, J.: GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In: Proc. National CSCW Workshop, pp. 165–173 (1994)

  26. Robertson, S.E., Walker, S., Jones, S., Hancock-Beaulieu, M., Gatford, M.: Okapi at TREC-3. Paper presented at the 4th Text REtrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland (1994)

  27. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. In: Readings in information retrieval, pp. 355–364, Morgan Kauffman, San Francisco (1997)

  28. Shardanand, U., Maes, P.: Social information filtering: algorithms for automating word of mouth. In: Proc. SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, Denver, Colorado, USA, pp. 210–217 (1995)

  29. Smeaton, A.F., Over, P., Kraaij, W.: Evaluation campaigns and TRECVid. In: Proc. ACM SIGMM International Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval, Santa Barbara, California, USA, pp. 321–330 (2006)

  30. Smyth B., Balfe E., Freyne J., Briggs P., Coyle M., Boydell O.: Exploiting query repetition and regularity in an adaptive community-based web search engine. User Model. User-Adaptated Interact. 14(5), 383–423 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Snoek, C., Worring, M., Koelma, D., Smeulders, A.: Learned lexicon-driven interactive video retrieval. In: Proc. International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval, Tempe, Arizona, USA, pp. 11–20 (2006)

  32. Snoek C.G., Worring M., Koelma D.C., Smeulders A.W.M.: A learned lexicon-Driven paradigm for interactive video retrieval. Trans. Multimed. 9(2), 280–292 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sparck Jones, K., Van Rijsbergen, C.: Report on the need for and provision of an “Ideal” information retrieval test collection. In: British Library Research and Development Report 5266, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge (1975)

  34. Spink A, Greisdorf H., Bateman J.: From highly relevant to not relevant: examining different regions of relevance. Inf. Process. Manage. 34(5), 599–621 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Urban, J., Hilaire, X., Hopfgartner, F., Villa, R., Jose, J., Chantamunee, S., Gotoh, Y.: Glasgow University at TRECVid 2006. Paper presented at the 4th TREC Video Retrieval Evaluation (TRECVID) workshop, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 13–14 November 2006

  36. Wexelblat, A., Maes, P.: Footprints: history rich tools for information foraging. In: Proc. SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp. 270–277 (1999)

  37. White, R., Bilenko, M., Cucerzan, S.: Studying the use of popular destinations to enhance Web search interaction. In: Proc. Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, Amsterdam, pp. 159–166 (2007)

  38. Yang, B., Mei, T., Hua, X.-S., Yang, L., Yang, S.-Q., Li, M.: Online video recommendation based on multimodal fusion and relevance feedback. In: Proc. Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, Amsterdam, pp. 73–80 (2007)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Vallet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vallet, D., Hopfgartner, F., Halvey, M. et al. Community based feedback techniques to improve video search. SIViP 2, 289–306 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-008-0087-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-008-0087-y

Keywords

Navigation