Skip to main content
Log in

Hybrid non-convex second-order total variation with applications to non-blind image deblurring

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Total variation is a very popular method for image restoration, yet it produces undesirable staircase artifacts. In this paper, a combined second-order non-convex total variation with overlapping group sparse regularizer for staircase artifact removal is proposed. The non-convex higher-order TV regularizer is introduced to model the observation that the staircase effect must be appropriately smoothen out in the restored image while preserving its edges. However, using the non-convex higher-order TV alone tends to smoothen the image while amplifying speckle artifacts. To deal with this, the overlapping group sparse regularizer is added to balance the effects produced by the non-convex higher-order TV regularizer. An efficient re-weighted \(\ell _1\) alternating direction method is formulated to solve the corresponding iterative scheme. Comparative analysis with three algorithms, namely overlapping group sparse total variation, total generalized variation and the fast non-smooth non-convex method, with two different blur kernels is carried out. The results from peak signal-to-noise ratio and structural similarity index measure show the effectiveness of our proposed method when compared to the mentioned algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Cell image obtained from: http://www.cellimagelibrary.org.

  2. The Brain and Liver images obtained from: http://adni.loni.usc.edu.

  3. Additional images for visual inspection are provided in “Appendix” as a supplementary file.

References

  1. Avcibas, I., Sankur, B., Sayood, K.: Statistical evaluation of image quality measures. J. Electron. Imaging 11(2), 206–224 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., Eckstein, J.: Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Found. Trends® Mach. Learn. 3(1), 1–122 (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bredies, K., Kunisch, K., Pock, T.: Total generalized variation. SIAM J. Imag. Sci. 3(3), 492–526 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1137/090769521

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Candes, E.J., Wakin, M.B., Boyd, S.P.: Enhancing sparsity by reweighted \(\ell 1\) minimization. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 14(5–6), 877–905 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan, S.H., Khoshabeh, R., Gibson, K.B., Gill, P.E., Nguyen, T.Q.: An augmented lagrangian method for total variation video restoration. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20(11), 3097–3111 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, C., Peng, Z., Huang, J.: O (1) algorithms for overlapping group sparsity. In: 22nd International conference on pattern recognition (ICPR), 2014, pp. 1645–1650. IEEE (2014)

  7. Chen, G.H., Yang, C.L., Po, L.M., Xie, S.L.: Edge-based structural similarity for image quality assessment. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP Proceedings, vol. 2, pp. II–II. IEEE (2006)

  8. Chen, P.Y., Selesnick, I.W.: Translation-invariant shrinkage/thresholding of group sparse signals. Signal Process 94, 476–489 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Du, H., Liu, Y.: Minmax-concave total variation denoising. Signal, Image and Video Processing, pp. 1–8 (2018)

  10. Guo, W., Qin, J., Yin, W.: A new detail-preserving regularization scheme. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 7(2), 1309–1334 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. He, C., Hu, C., Yang, X., He, H., Zhang, Q.: An adaptive total generalized variation model with augmented lagrangian method for image denoising. Math. Problems Eng. 2014, 11 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hore, A., Ziou, D.: Image quality metrics: PSNR vs. SSIM. In: 20th International Conference on Pattern recognition (ICPR), pp. 2366–2369. IEEE (2010)

  13. Liu, J., Huang, T.Z., Selesnick, I.W., Lv, X.G., Chen, P.Y.: Image restoration using total variation with overlapping group sparsity. Inf. Sci. 295, 232–246 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Lysaker, M., Lundervold, A., Tai, X.C.: Noise removal using fourth-order partial differential equation with applications to medical magnetic resonance images in space and time. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 12(12), 1579–1590 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nikolova, M., Ng, M.K., Tam, C.P.: Fast nonconvex nonsmooth minimization methods for image restoration and reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 19(12), 3073–3088 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Papafitsoros, K., Schönlieb, C.B.: A combined first and second order variational approach for image reconstruction. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 48(2), 308–338 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Rudin, L.I., Osher, S., Fatemi, E.: Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 60(1), 259–268 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Selesnick, I.W., Chen, P.Y.: Total variation denoising with overlapping group sparsity. In: IEEE International conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), pp. 5696–5700. IEEE (2013)

  19. Shi, M., Han, T., Liu, S.: Total variation image restoration using hyper-Laplacian prior with overlapping group sparsity. Signal Processing 126, 65–76 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, Y., Yang, J., Yin, W., Zhang, Y.: A new alternating minimization algorithm for total variation image reconstruction. SIAM J. Imag. Sci. 1(3), 248–272 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu, C., Tai, X.C.: Augmented lagrangian method, dual methods, and split Bregman iteration for rof, vectorial tv, and high order models. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 3(3), 300–339 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1137/090767558

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu, J., Feng, X., Hao, Y., Han, Y.: Image decomposition using adaptive second-order total generalized variation. Signal Image Video Process. 8(1), 39–47 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, J., Hao, Y., Li, M., Zhang, X.: A novel variational model for image decomposition. In: Signal, Image and Video Processingpp, pp. 1–8 (2019)

  25. You, Y.L., Kaveh, M.: Fourth-order partial differential equations for noise removal. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9(10), 1723–1730 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tarmizi Adam.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 412 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adam, T., Paramesran, R. Hybrid non-convex second-order total variation with applications to non-blind image deblurring. SIViP 14, 115–123 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-019-01531-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-019-01531-3

Keywords

Navigation