Skip to main content
Log in

Urban green space, uneven development and accessibility: a case of Dalian's Xigang District

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the socio-spatial context of uneven development and the residential accessibility of green space in Dalian of Liaoning Province, China. The social fairness was analyzed with a community scale as the basis. We combined social scientific methods with a GIS method using a behavior accessibility model from the perspectives of fairness of urban green space allocation based on social geography, geographic information science, management science and many other related discipline theories. The results show that: 1) Most of the urban green space distribution presents an unbalanced phenomenon, and it does not match with the population distribution; 2) We found some differences in the accessibility of the population with different attributes and opportunities to use and enjoy the urban green spaces, mainly due to: the dual social and spatial attributes of the residents and the serious stratum differentiation generated were the internal causes; the residential space differentiation and the pursuit of economic and real estate development were the direct causes; and unreasonable planning, in regard to the fact that government policies did not give consideration to efficiency and fairness, was also an important factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beler E F, 1997. The distribution of urban public services: the case of parks and recreational services in Ankara. Cities, 14(6): 353–361. doi: 10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00026-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen P, Potchter O, Schnell I, 2014. A methodological approach to the environmental quantitative assessment of urban parks. Applied Geography, 48: 87–101. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai D, 2011. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in urban green space accessibility: where to intervene? Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(4): 234–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson K J, 1995. A comprehensive conservation strategy for Georgia's greenways. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33(1): 27–43. doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(94)02012-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles-Corti B, Broomhall M H, Knuiman M et al., 2005. Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? American journal of preventive medicine, 28(2): 169–176. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu Mingdong, Yin Haiwei, 2010. Review on spatial accessibility and equity of public facilities. Urban Problems, (5): 25–29. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Zhibin, He Xingyuan, Lu Qingxuan et al., 2005. Green space accessibility research based on GIS: taking Shenyang as an example. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University (Natural Science), 21(6): 671–675. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Haiyan, Zhou Chunshan, Xiao Rongbo, 2010. Spatial differentiation and social equity of public parks in Guanzhou. City Planning Review, (4): 43–48. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jim C Y, Chen W Y, 2006. Recreation–amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75(1): 81–96. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabisch N, Haase D, 2014. Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122: 129–139. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Bo, Song Yun, Yu Kongjian, 2008. Evaluation Method for Measurement of Accessibility in Urban Public Green Space Planning. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 44(4): 618–624. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lineberry R L, 1977. Equality and Urban Policy: The Distribution of Municipal Public Services. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucy W, 1981. Equity and planning for local services. Journal of the American Planning Association, 47(4): 447–457. doi: 10.1080/01944368108976526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Linbing, Cao Xiaoshu, 2006. A GIS-based evalutation method for accessibility of urban public green landscape. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 45(6): 111–115. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullick A, 1993. Accessibility issues in park design: the National Parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26(1): 25–33. doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(93)90005-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich R C, 1979. Neglected issues in the study of urban service distributions: a research agenda. Urban Studies, 16(2): 143–156. doi: 10.1080/00420987920080221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sang Lijie, Shu Yonggang, Zhu Weiping et al., 2013. Accessibility of urban green spaces in Hangzhou City. Progress in Geography, 32(6): 950–957. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez T H, Malkoc Y E, Altug I, 2007. Evaluation of elderly people's requirements in public open spaces: a case study in Bornova District (Izmir, Turkey). Building and Environment, 42(5): 2035–2045. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talen E, 1998. Visualizing fairness: equity maps for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1): 22–38. doi: 10.1080/01944369808975954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talen E, Anselin L, 1998. Assessing spatial equity: an evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environment and Planning A, 30(4): 595–613. doi: 10.1068/a300595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van H A, Wiedemann T, 2003. A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(2): 109–126. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00192-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Laijie, 2007. Changes in public services in Western countries: orbits and characteristics. Socialism Studies, (6): 89–92. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks B E, Crompton J L, 1986. Citizen and administrator perspectives of equity in the delivery of park services. Leisure Sciences, 8(4): 341–365. doi: 10.1080/01490408609513080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright W H E, Zarger R K, Mihelcic J R, 2012. Accessibility and usability: green space preferences, perceptions, and barriers in a rapidly urbanizing city in Latin America. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(3): 272–282. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Haiwei, Kong Fanhua, Zong Yueguang, 2008. Accessibility and equity assessment on urban green space. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(7): 3375–3383. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin Haiwei, Kong Fanhua, 2006. Accessibility analysis of urban green space in Jinan. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 30(1): 17–24. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Kongjian, Duan Tiewu, Li Dihua et al., 1999. Landscape accessibility as a measurement of the function of urban green system. City Planning Review, 23(8): 8–11. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Xiang, Zhang Xiaogang, He Longbin et al., 2013. Equity assessment on urban green space pattern based on human behavior scale and its optimization strategy: a case study in Shenzhen. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 49(5): 892–898. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Yang.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41471140)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, J., Li, C., Li, Y. et al. Urban green space, uneven development and accessibility: a case of Dalian's Xigang District. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 25, 644–656 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-015-0781-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-015-0781-y

Keywords

Navigation