Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction and optimization of process parameter of friction stir welded AA5083-H111 aluminum alloy using response surface methodology

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A systematic approach was presented to develop the empirical model for predicting the ultimate tensile strength of AA5083-H111 aluminum alloy which is widely used in ship building industry by incorporating friction stir welding (FSW) process parameters such as tool rotational speed, welding speed, and axial force. FSW was carried out considering three-factor five-level central composite rotatable design with full replications technique. Response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to developing linear regression model for establishing the relationship between the FSW process parameters and ultimate tensile strength. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) technique was used to check the adequacy of the developed model. The FSW process parameters were also optimized using response surface methodology (RSM) to maximize the ultimate tensile strength. The joint welded at a tool rotational speed of 1 000 r/min, a welding speed of 69 mm/min and an axial force of 1.33 t exhibits higher tensile strength compared with other joints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DAWES C J, THOMAS W M. Friction stir joining of aluminum alloys [C]// TWI Bulletin. The Welding Institute, 1995: 124.

  2. COLLIGAN K J. Frictions stir welding for ship construction [M]. Harrisburg, PA: Concurrent Technologies Corporation, 2004: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. PEEL M, STEUWER A, PREUSS M, WITHERS P J. Microstructure mechanical properties and residual stresses as a function of welding speed in aluminum AA5083 friction stir welds [J]. Acta Materialia, 2003, 51(16): 4791–4801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. HAN M S, LEE S J, PARK J C, KO S C, WOO Y B, KIM S J. Optimum condition by mechanical characteristic evaluation in friction stir welding for 5083-O Al alloy [J]. Transaction of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2009, 19(1): 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. LEAL R, LOUREIRO A. Defects formation in friction stir welding of aluminium alloys [J]. Advanced Material Forum II, 2004, 455/456: 299–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. CHEN Y C, LIU H, FENG J. Friction stir welding characteristics of different heat-treated-state 2219 aluminium alloy plates [J]. Material Science Engineering A, 2006, 420(1/2): 21–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. GRUM J, SLABE J M. The use of factorial design and response surface methodology for fast determination of optimal heat treatment conditions of different Ni-Co-Mo surfaced layers [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2004, 155(30): 2026–2032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. GUNARAJ V, MURUGAN N. Application of response surface methodology for predicting weld bead quality in submerged arc welding of pipes [J]. Journal of Material Processing Technology, 1999, 88: 266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MANONMANI K, MURUGAN N, BUVANASEKARAN G. Effect of process parameters on the weld bead geometry of laser beam welded stainless steel sheets [J]. International Journal of Joining Materials, 2005, 17(4): 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  10. BALASUBRAMANIAN M, JAYABALAN V, BALASUBRAMANIAN V. Developing mathematical models to predict tensile properties of pulsed current gas tungsten arc welded Ti-6Al-4V alloy [J]. Materials and Design, 2008, 29(1): 92–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. PALANI P K, MURUGAN N. Optimization of weld bead geometry for stainless steel claddings deposited by FCAW [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2007, 190(1): 291–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. PALANI P K, MURUGAN N. Sensitivity analysis for process parameters in cladding of stainless steel by flux cored arc welding [J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2006, 8(2): 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. KARTHIKEYAN R, BALASUBRAMANIAN V. Predictions of the optimized friction stir spot welding process parameters for joining AA2024 aluminum alloy using RSM [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2010, 51: 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. COLLIGAN J, PAUL J, KONKOL, JAMES J, FISHER P, JOSEPH R. Friction stir welding demonstrated for combat vehicle construction [J]. Welding Journal, 2003, 82(3): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ELANGOVAN K, BALASUBRAMANIAN V, VALLIAPPAN M. Influences of tool pin profile and axial force on the formation of friction stir processing zone in AA6061 aluminium alloy [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008, 38: 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. TIEN C L, LIN S W. Optimization of process parameters of titanium dioxide films by response surfaces methodology [J]. Optics Communication, 2006, 266(2): 574–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. PHILLIP J R. Taguchi techniques for quality engineering [M]. New York: Mc Graw-Hill, 1988: 114.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Palanivel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palanivel, R., Koshy Mathews, P. Prediction and optimization of process parameter of friction stir welded AA5083-H111 aluminum alloy using response surface methodology. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 19, 1–8 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-0964-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-0964-y

Key words

Navigation