Skip to main content
Log in

Global lateral buckling analysis of idealized subsea pipelines

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to avoid the curing effects of paraffin on the transport process and reduce the transport difficulty, usually high temperature and high pressure are used in the transportation of oil and gas. The differences of temperature and pressure cause additional stress along the pipeline, due to the constraint of the foundation soil, the additional stress can not release freely, when the additional stress is large enough to motivate the submarine pipelines buckle. In this work, the energy method is introduced to deduce the analytical solution which is suitable for the global buckling modes of idealized subsea pipeline and analyze the relationship between the critical buckling temperature, buckling length and amplitude under different high-order global lateral buckling modes. To obtain a consistent formulation of the problem, the principles of virtual displacements and the variation calculus for variable matching points are applied. The finite element method based on elasto-plastic theory is used to simulate the lateral global buckling of the pipelines under high temperature and pressure. The factors influencing the lateral buckling of pipelines are further studied. Based upon some actual engineering projects, the finite element results are compared with the analytical ones, and then the influence of thermal stress, the section rigidity of pipeline, the soil properties and the trigging force to the high order lateral buckling are discussed. The method of applying the small trigging force on pipeline is reliable in global buckling numerical analysis. In practice, increasing the section rigidity of a pipeline is an effective measure to improve the ability to resist the global buckling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LIU R, WANG W G, YAN S W. Engineering measures for preventing upheaval buckling of buried submarine pipelines [J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics: English Edition, 2012, 33(6): 781–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. ZHANG P Y, DING H Y, LE C H. Installation and removal records of field trials for two mooring dolphin platforms with three suction caissons [J]. ASCE: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 2013, 139(6): 502–517.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ZHOU Y D, LIU R Z. The situation and development prospect of submarine pipeline in current [J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas (Engineering), 1998: 10(4): 1–5.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. BAI Y C, YANG Y H. The dynamic stability of the flow in a meander channel [J]. Science China: Technological Sciences, 2011, 54(4): 931–940

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. ZHANG P Y, DING H Y, LE C H. Motion analysis on integrated transportation technique for offshore wind turbines [J]. AIP: Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2013, 5(5): 053117-1–053117-15.

    Google Scholar 

  6. LYONS C G. Soil resistance to lateral sliding of marine pipelines [C]// Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 1876. Dallas, Texas, 1973: 479–482.

    Google Scholar 

  7. HOBBS R E. In-service buckling of heated pipelines [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1984, 110(2): 175–189

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. TALOR N, GAN A B. Refined modeling for the lateral buckling of submarine pipeline [J]. Journal of Construct Steel Research, 1986, 6(2): 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. SCHOTMAN G J M. Pile-soil interaction: A model for laterally loaded pipelines in clay [C]// Offshore Technology Conference, OTC5588, Houston, Texas, 1987, 317–324.

    Google Scholar 

  10. PRESTON R, DRENNAN F, CAMERON C, KENNY J P. Controlled lateral buckling of large diameter pipeline by snaked lay [C]// The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers. Brest. France: Proceedings of the ninth(1999) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 1999, 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  11. PEEK R, YUN H. Flotation to trigger lateral buckles in pipelines on a flat seabed [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2007, 133(4): 442–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. BURIO N P, ROEHL D, ROMANEL C A. Three dimensional contact model for soil-pipe interaction [J]. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, 2007, 2(8): 1501–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. PAUL J, ELTAHER A, SUN J. The latest developments in the design and simulation of deepwater subsea oil and gas pipelines using FEA [C]// Proceedings of the third International Deep-Ocean Technology Symposium, Beijing, China, 2009, 70–82.

    Google Scholar 

  14. KERR A D. Analysis of thermal track buckling in the lateral plane [J]. Acta Mechanical, 1978, 30: 17–50.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. YANG X L, HUANG F. Three-dimensional failure mechanism of a rectangular cavity in a Hoek-Brown rock medium [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2013, 61: 189–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. YANG X L, HUANG F. Collapse mechanism of shallow tunnel based on nonlinear Hoek-Brown failure criterion [J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 2011, 26(6): 686–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. YANG X L. Seismic passive pressures of earth structures by nonlinear optimization [J]. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 2011, 81(9): 1195–1202.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. YANG X L, WANG J M. Ground movement prediction for tunnels using simplified procedure [J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 2011, 26(3): 462–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. LIU R, WANG W G, YAN S W. Finite element analysis on thermal upheaval buckling of submarine burial pipelines with initial imperfection [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(1): 236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. YANG X L, ZOU J F. Cavity expansion analysis with non-linear failure criterion [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 164(1): 41–49.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. LIU R, YAN S W, LI Z H. Soil plug effect prediction and pile drivability analysis for large-diameter steel piles in ocean engineering [J]. China ocean Engineering, 2009, 23(1): 107–118.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. YANG X L, JIN Q Y, MA J Q. Pressure from surrounding rock of three shallow tunnels with large section and small spacing [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(8): 2380–2385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. ZHANG P Y, DING H Y, LE C H. Penetration and removal of the mooring dolphin platform with three caisson foundations [J]. ASME-Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 2013, 135(4): 041302-1–041302-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. DNV-RP-F110. Recommended practice det norske veritas [S].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Run Liu  (刘润).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(51021004) supported by Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Project(NCET-11-0370) supported by Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Universities of China; Project(40776055) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Project(1002) supported by State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering Foundation, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, R., Liu, Wb., Wu, Xl. et al. Global lateral buckling analysis of idealized subsea pipelines. J. Cent. South Univ. 21, 416–427 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-1955-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-1955-y

Key words

Navigation