Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation on jointed rock strength based on fractal theory

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Strength of discontinuities with complex structure is an important topic in rock engineering. A large number of studies have shown that fractal is applicable in the description of this discontinuity. Using fractal interpolation method for the generation of rock joints, numerical experiments of shear tests of the jointed rock mass model were carried out using FLAC3D. The test results show that the real rock joints can be simulated by fractal curves obtained by fractal interpolation. The fractal dimension is an important factor for the characterization of jointed rock mass; test results show that the fractal dimension of rock joints can be related to the equivalent cohesion strength and shear strength of the rock mass. When the fractal dimension of the joint surface is less than critical dimension D c 1.404, the cohesion strength and shear strength of the rock mass increase as the fractal dimension increases; for larger fractal dimensions, all mechanical parameters decrease as the fractal dimension increases. Joint surfaces with different degrees of roughness were obtained by the fractal interpolation method. Three types of failure modes were observed in the tests: climbing slip failure, climbing gnawing fracture, and non-climbing gnawing fracture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ZHOU Yu, WU Shun-chuan, GAO Yong-tao, MISRA A. Macro and meso analysis of jointed rock mass triaxial compression test by using equivalent rock mass (ERM) technique [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(3): 1125–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. POWER W L, TULLIS T E. Euclidean and fractal models for the description of rock surface roughness [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012), 1991, 96(B1): 415–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. RADLINSKI A P, RADLINSKA E Z, AGAMALIAN M, WIGNALL G D, LINDNER P, RANDL O G. Fractal geometry of rocks [J]. Physical Review Letters, 1999, 82(15): 3078–3081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. MANDELBROT B B. How long is the coast of Britain [J]. Science, 1967, 156(3775): 636–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. XIE He-ping, CHEN Zhi-da. Fractal geometry and fracture of rock [J]. Acta Mech Sinica, 1988, 4(3): 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. MILLER S M, MCWILLIAMS P C, KERKERING J C. Ambiguities in estimating fractal dimensions of rock fracture surfaces [C]// Proc 31st US Symp on Rock Mech. The Netherlands: AA Balkema Rotterdam, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. DEN OUTER A, KAASHOEK J F, HACK H R. Difficulties with using continuous fractal theory for discontinuity surfaces [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1995, 32(1): 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. KEWEN L. Characterization of rock heterogeneity using fractal geometry [C]// SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium and Western Regional Meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. TURK N, GREIG M J, DEARMAN W R, AMIN F F. Characterization of rock joint surfaces by fractal dimension [C]// The 28th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. BOADU F K, LONG L T. The fractal character of fracture spacing and RQD [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1994, 31(2): 127–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. CARR J R, WARDNER J B. Rock mass classification using fractal dimension [C]// The 28th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. AI T, ZHANG R, ZHOU H W, PEI J L. Box-counting methods to directly estimate the fractal dimension of a rock surface [J]. Applied Surface Science, 2014, 314: 610–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. YANG Z Y, DI C C, LO S C. Two-dimensional Hurst index of joint surfaces [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2001, 34(4): 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. KULATILAKE P H S W, BALASINGAM P, PARK J, MORGAN R. Natural rock joint roughness quantification through fractal techniques [J]. Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, 2006, 24(5): 1181–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. KULATILAKE P H S W, FIEDLER R, PANDA B B. Box fractal dimension as a measure of statistical homogeneity of jointed rock masses [J]. Engineering Geology, 1997, 48(3): 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. XI Yue, CHEN Jin-jian, XU Yong-fu, CHU Fei-fei, LIU Chuan-xin. Yield stress of fractal aggregates [J]. Fractals, 2015, 23(03): 1550028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. LEE Y H, CARR J R, BARR D J, HAAS C J. The fractal dimension as a measure of the roughness of rock discontinuity profiles [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1990, 27(6): 453–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. XIE He-ping, WANG Jin-an, XIE Wei-hong. Fractal effects of surface roughness on the mechanical behavior of rock joints [J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 1997, 8(2): 221–252.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. XIE H P, LIU J F, JU Y, LI J, XIE L. Z. Fractal property of spatial distribution of acoustic emissions during the failure process of bedded rock salt [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2011, 48(8): 1344–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. YANG Lu-jun, ZOU Yan-ping, QIAN Jian-long. Application of fractal geometry in research of jointed rock mass [J]. China Water Transport, 2007, 5(8): 60–62. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  21. YANG Jie. Study on fractal interpolated and its fractal dimension [J]. Journal of Wuhan Polytechnic University, 2006, 25(1): 9–11. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  22. LI Shui-gen. Fractal [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2004: 236. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. WANG Wei, LI Liang-quan, XU Wei-ya, MENG Qing-xiang, LI Jun. Creep failure mode and criterion of Xiangjiaba sandstone [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(12): 3572–3581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. NIKADAT N, FATEHI M, ABDOLLAHIPOUR A. Numerical modelling of stress analysis around rectangular tunnels with large discontinuities (fault) by a hybridized indirect BEM [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22(11): 4291–4299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. SUN Shu-wei, REN Hang, REN Lian-wei. Application of FLAC3D in geotechnical engineering [M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2011. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. LI Hai-bo, FENG Hai-peng, LIU Bo. Study on strength behaviors of rock joints under different shearing deformation velocities [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(12): 2435–2440. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. ZHOU Rui-guang. Mechanical effect of structural plane of rock mass [J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 1981(1): 46–51. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lan-lan Yang  (杨兰兰).

Additional information

Foundation item: Projects(51479049, 51209075) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Ll., Xu, Wy., Meng, Qx. et al. Investigation on jointed rock strength based on fractal theory. J. Cent. South Univ. 24, 1619–1626 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-017-3567-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-017-3567-9

Key words

Navigation