Skip to main content
Log in

Construction of Antimagic Labeling for the Cartesian Product of Regular Graphs

  • Published:
Mathematics in Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An antimagic labeling of a graph with p vertices and q edges is a bijection from the set of edges to the set of integers {1, 2, . . . , q} such that all vertex weights are pairwise distinct, where a vertex weight is the sum of labels of all edges incident with the vertex. A graph is antimagic if it has an antimagic labeling. In 1990, Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that that every connected graph, except K 2, is antimagic. Recently, using completely separating systems, Phanalasy et al. showed that for each \({k\geq 2,\,q\geq\binom{k+1}{2}}\) with k|2q, there exists an antimagic k-regular graph with q edges and p = 2q/k vertices. In this paper we prove constructively that certain families of Cartesian products of regular graphs are antimagic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alon N., Kaplan G., Lev A., Rodity Y., Yuster R.: Dense graphs are antimagic. J. Graph Theory 47, 297–309 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baca M., Miller M.: Super Edge–Antimagic Graphs: A Wealth of Problems and Some Solutions. BrownWalker Press, Boca Raton (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng Y.: Lattice grids and prisms are antimagic. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 374, 66–73 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng Y.: A new class of antimagic Cartesian product graphs. Discret. Math. 308, 6441–6448 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cranston D.W.: Regular bipartite graphs are antimagic. J. Graph Theory 60, 173–182 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dickson T.J.: On a problem concerning separating systems of a finite Set. J. Combin. Theory 7, 191–196 (1969)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gallian J.A.: A dynamic survey of graph labelling. Electron. J. Combin. 17, #DS6 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Hartsfield N., Ringel J.H.: Pearls in graph theory: a comprehensive introduction. Academic Press Inc., San Diago, USA (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hefetz D.: Antimagic graphs via the combinatorial nullstellensatz. J. Graph Theory 50, 263–272 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Phanalasy, O., Miller, M., Rylands, L.J., Lieby, P.: On a relationship between completely separating systems and antimagic labeling of regular graphs. In: Iliopoulos, C.S., Smyth W.F. (eds.) Proceeding of IWOCA10, London, July 2010, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6460 (in press)

  11. Roberts, I.T.: Extremal problems and designs on finite sets. Thesis, Curtin University of Technology (1999)

  12. Wang T.M.: Toroidal grids are anti-magic. Comput. Combin. Lecture Notes Comput. Sci. 3595, 671–679 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang T.M., Hsiao C.C.: On anti-magic labelling for graphs. Discret. Math. 308, 3624–3633 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Y., Sun X.: The antimagicness of the Cartesian product of graphs. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 410, 727–735 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oudone Phanalasy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phanalasy, O., Miller, M., Iliopoulos, C.S. et al. Construction of Antimagic Labeling for the Cartesian Product of Regular Graphs. Math.Comput.Sci. 5, 81–87 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11786-011-0084-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11786-011-0084-3

Keywords

Navigation