Skip to main content
Log in

Design of bridges against large tectonic deformation

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The engineering community has devoted much effort to understanding the response of soil-structure systems to seismic ground motions, but little attention to the effects of an outcropping fault offset. The 1999 earthquakes of Turkey and Taiwan, offering a variety of case histories of structural damage due to faulting, have (re)fueled the interest on the subject. This paper presents a methodology for design of bridges against tectonic deformation. The problem is decoupled in two analysis steps: the first (at the local level) deals with the response of a single pier and its foundation to fault rupture propagating through the soil, and the superstructure is modeled in a simplified manner; and the second (at the global level) investigates detailed models of the superstructure subjected to the support (differential) displacements of Step 1. A parametric study investigates typical models of viaduct and overpass bridges, founded on piles or caissons. Fixed-head piled foundations are shown to be rather vulnerable to faulting-induced deformation. End-bearing piles in particular are unable to survive bedrock offsets exceeding 10 cm. Floating piles perform better, and if combined with hinged pile-to-cap connections, they could survive much larger offsets. Soil resilience is beneficial in reducing pile distress. Caisson foundations are almost invariably successful. Statically-indeterminate superstructures are quite vulnerable, while statically-determinate are insensitive (allowing differential displacements and rotations without suffering any distress). For large-span cantilever-construction bridges, where a statically determinate system is hardly an option, inserting resilient seismic isolation bearings is advantageous as long as ample seating can prevent the deck from falling off the supports. An actual application of the developed method is presented for a major bridge, demonstrating the feasibility of design against tectonic deformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambraseys NN and Jackson JA (1990), “Seismicity and Associated Strain of Central Greece Between 1890 and 1988,” International Journal of Geophysics, 126(3):663–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasopoulos I and Gazetas G (2007a), “Foundationstructure Systems over a Rupturing Normal Fault: Part I. Observations After the Kocaeli 1999 Earthquake,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 5(3): 253–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasopoulos I and Gazetas G. (2007b), Behaviour of Structure-foundation Systems over a Rupturing Normal Fault: Part II. Analysis of the Kocaeli Case Histories,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 5(3): 277–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasopoulos I, Gazetas G, Bransby MF, Davies MCR and El Nahas A (2007), “Fault Rupture Propagation Through Sand: Finite Element Analysis and Validation Through Centrifuge Experiments,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 133(8): 943–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasopoulos I, Gazetas G, Bransby MF, Davies MCR and El Nahas A (2008), “Normal Fault Rupture Interaction with Strip Foundations,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE. (in print)

  • Anastasopoulos I, Gerolymos N and Gazetas G (2001), “Possible Collapse Reasons of an Access Span of the Nishinomiya-ko Bridge: Kobe 1995,” Proceedings of the 4th Hellenic Conference on Geotechnical Engineering, Athens, Vol. 2, pp. 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berill, JB (1983), “Two-dimensional Analysis of the Effect of Fault Rupture on Buildings with Shallow Foundations,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2(3): 156–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransby, MF, Davies MCR and El Nahas A (2008a), “Centrifuge Modelling of Normal Fault-foundation Interaction,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Special Issue: Integrated Approach to Fault Rupture- and Soil-foundation Interaction. (in press)

  • Bray JD (1990), “The Effects of Tectonic Movements on Stresses and Deformations in Earth Embankments,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray JD (2001), “Developing Mitigation Measures for the Hazards Associated with Earthquake Surface Fault Rupture,” Workshop on Seismic Fault-induced Failures — Possible Remedies for Damage to Urban Facilities, University of Tokyo Press, pp. 55–79.

  • Bray JD, Seed RB, Cluff LS and Seed HB (1994a), “Earthquake Fault Rupture Propagation Through Soil,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 120(3):543–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray JD, Seed RB and Seed HB (1994b), “Analysis of Earthquake Fault Rupture Propagation Through Cohesive Soil,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 120(3): 562–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brune JN and Allen CR (1967), “A Low-stress-drop, Low Magnitude Earthquake with Surface Faulting, The Imperial, California, Earthquake of March 4, 1966,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 57:501–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole DA Jr and Lade PV (1984), “Influence Zones in Alluvium Over Dip-slip Faults,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 110(5): 599–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan JM and Lefebvre G (1973), “Earth Pressure on Structures Due to Fault Movement,” Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, ASCE, 99: 1153–1163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdik M (2001), “Report on 1999 Kocaeli and Düzce (Turkey) Earthquakes,” Casciati G, Structural Control for Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Magonette: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faccioli E, Anastasopoulos I, Callerio A and Gazetas G (2008), “Case Histories of Fault-foundation Interaction,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Special Issue: Integrated approach to fault rupture- and soil-foundation interaction. (in press)

  • Gerolymos N and Gazetas G (2006a), “Winkler Model for Lateral Response of Rigid Caisson Foundations in Linear Soil,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 26(5): 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerolymos N and Gazetas G (2006b), “Development of Winkler Model for Static and Dynamic Response of Caisson Foundations with Soil and Interface Nonlinearities,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 26(5): 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerolymos N, Giannakou A, Anastasopoulos I and Gazetas G (2008), “Evidence of Beneficial Role of Inclined Piles: Observations and Numerical Results,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Special Issue: Integrated approach to fault rupture- and soil-foundation interaction. (in press)

  • Hanlong L, Susamu I and Ichii K (1997), “Evaluation of Deformation to the Pneumatic Caisson Foundations of the Kobe Ohashi Bridge,” Report, The Port and Harbor Research Institute, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsfield WT (1977), “An Experimental Approach to Basement-controlled Faulting,” Geologie En Mijnboyw, 56(4): 363–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang HY (2000), Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake 9.21.99. Bird’s Eye View of Cher-lung-pu Fault,” Taipei: Flying Tiger Cultural Pub., pp. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell RA and Roth CP (1987), “Direct Shear Tests on Reinforced Sand,” Gétechnique, 37(1): 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawashima K (2001), “Damage of Bridges Resulting from Fault Rupture in The 1999 Kocaeli and Duzce, Turkey Earthquakes and The 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake,” Workshop on Seismic Fault-Induced Failures-Possible Remedies for Damage to Urban Facilities, University of Tokyo Press, pp. 171–190.

  • Niccum MR, Cluff LS, Chamoro F and Wylie L (1976), “Banco Central de Nicaragua: A Case History of a Highrise Building That Survived Surface Fault Rupture,” Humphrey CB, Engineering Geology and Soils Engineering Symposium, No. 14, Idaho Transportation Department, Division of Highways, pp. 133–144.

  • Pamuk A, Kalkanb E and Linga HI (2005), “Structural and Geotechnical Impacts of Surface Rupture on Highway Structures During Recent Earthquakes in Turkey,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 25: 581–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadimitriou EE and Karakostas VG (2003), “Episodic Occurrence of Strong (Mw ≥ 6.2) Earthquakes in Thessalia Area (central Greece),” Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 215: 395–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papastamatiou D and Mouyaris N (1986), “The Earthquake of April 30, 1954, in Sophades (Central Greece),” Geophys. J.R. Astron. Soc., 87: 885–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slemmons DB (1957), “Geological Effects of the Dixie Valley-fairview Peak, Nevada, Earthquakes of December 16, 1954,” Bul. of the Seism. Soc. of America, 47(4): 353–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CL, Cline KM, Page WD and Schwartz DP (1985), “The Borah Peak, Idaho earthquake of October 28, 1983 — Surface Faulting and Other Phenomena,” Earthquake Spectra, 2(1): 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tazoh T, Ohtsuki A, Aoki T, Mano H, Isoda K, Iwamoto T, Arakawa T, Ishihara T and Ookawa M (2002), “A New Pile-head Device for Decreasing Construction Costs and Increasing the Seismic Performance of Pile Foundations, and Its Application to Structures,” Proc. 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 720, Elsevier Science Ltd..

  • Ulusay R, Aydan O and Hamada M (2002), “The Behaviour of Structures Built on Active Fault Zones: Examples from the Recent Earthquakes of Turkey,” Structural Engineering & Earthquake Engineering, JSCE, 19(2): 149–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL (1989), “Ground Failure Damage to Buildings During Earthquakes,” Foundation Engineering Current Principles and Practices, Vol. 1, pp. 758–770. New York: ASCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL, Bardet JP and Bray JD (2000), “Kocaeli, Turkey, Earthquake of August 17, 1999 Reconnaissance Report,” Earthquake Spectra, 16(Suppl. A): 456.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Gazetas.

Additional information

Supported by: OSE (the Greek Railway Organization) Under the Grant No. 107/2004

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anastasopoulos, I., Gazetas, G., Drosos, V. et al. Design of bridges against large tectonic deformation. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 7, 345–368 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-008-1001-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-008-1001-x

Keywords

Navigation