Skip to main content
Log in

Energy analysis of a combined solid oxide fuel cell with a steam turbine power plant for marine applications

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Application Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Strong restrictions on emissions from marine power plants (particularly SO x , NO x ) will probably be adopted in the near future. In this paper, a combined solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) and steam turbine fuelled by natural gas is proposed as an attractive option to limit the environmental impact of the marine sector. The analyzed variant of the combined cycle includes a SOFC operated with natural gas fuel and a steam turbine with a single-pressure waste heat boiler. The calculations were performed for two types of tubular and planar SOFCs, each with an output power of 18 MW. This paper includes a detailed energy analysis of the combined system. Mass and energy balances are performed not only for the whole plant but also for each component in order to evaluate the thermal efficiency of the combined cycle. In addition, the effects of using natural gas as a fuel on the fuel cell voltage and performance are investigated. It has been found that a high overall efficiency approaching 60% may be achieved with an optimum configuration using the SOFC system. The hybrid system would also reduce emissions, fuel consumption, and improve the total system efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arsalis A (2008). Thermo economic modeling and parametric study of hybrid SOFC gas turbine steam turbine power plants ranging from 1.5 to 10MWe. Journal of Power Sources, 181, 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay JF (2006). Fuel cells, engines and hydrogen an exergy approach. john wiley & sons ltd, the atrium, southern gate, chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England: 13 978-0-470-01904-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S (2010). GL sees large market for fuel cells to replace marine auxiliary power. Fuel Cells Bulletin, German National Innovation Program for Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology: www.now-gmbh.de/index.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calise F, d’Accadia MD, Palombo A, Vanoli L (2006a). Simulation and exergy analysis of a hybrid solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) and gas turbine system. Energy, 31(15), 3278–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calise F, d’Accadia MD, Vanoli L, Von Spakovsky MR (2006b). Single level optimization of a hybrid SOFC-GT power plant. Journal of Power Sources, 159(2), 1169–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China Classification Society (2006). Rules for construction and equipment of ships carrying liquefied gases in bulk. Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett JJ, Winebrake JJ, Green EH, Kasibhatla P, Eyring V, Lauer A (2007). Mortality from ship emissions: a global assessment. Environmental Science and Technology, 41(24), 8512–8518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar WR, Lior N, Gaggioli RA (1991). Combining fuel cells with fuel-fired power plants for improved exergy efficiency. Journal of Energy, 16(10), 1259–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EG&G Technical Services, Inc. (2004). Fuel Cell Handbook. Seventh Edition, National Technical Information Service, U. S. Department of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr J (2011). LNG as a Fuel for Marine Applications.Lloyd’s Register. Middle East and Africa Advisory Technical Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figari M, D’Amico M, Gaggero P (2011). Evaluation of ship efficiency indexes. 14th Conference of the International Maritime Association of the Mediterranean (IMAM), Genoa, 621–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontell E, Kivisaari T, Christiansen N, Hansen J, Pålsson JB (2004). Conceptional study of a 250 kW planar SOFC system for CHP application. Journal of Power Sources, 131, 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George RA, et al. (2001). Single Module Pressurized Fuel Cell Turbine Generator System. US Patent (pending), WO 01/06589 A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghirardo F, et al. (2011). Heat recovery options for onboard fuel cell systems. Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 8134–8142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greensmith G (2010). The Legislative Landscape, Lloyd’s Register. Middle East and Africa Advisory Technical Committee: www.cdlive.lr.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood JBL (1988). Internal Combustion Engines. McGraw-Hill, Inc, 0-07-028637-X, 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland BJ, Zhu JG (2007). Design of A 500 W PEM fuel cell test system. Faculty of Engineering, University of Technology, Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO-IGC Code (2002). International gas code for construction and equipment of ships carrying liquefied gases in bulk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumm WH (1990). Marine and naval applications of fuel cells for propulsion: the process selection. Journal of Power Sources, 29, 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larminie J, Dicks A (2003). Fuel cell systems explained. 2nd Edition, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 0-470-84857-X, 60–91.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LisbonaPU, Serra JL (2005). High-temperature fuel cells for fresh water production. Journal of Desalination, 182, 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAN B&W (2010). Exhaust Gas Emission Control Today and Tomorrow, Application on MAN B&W Two-stroke Marine Diesel Engines. MAN Diesel, Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroju P (2002). Modeling of a fuel cell. Master of Science thesis, Texas Tech University, 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olszewski W (2011). Possible use of combined Diesel engine and steam turbine systems in ship power plants, Scientific Journals, 28, 88–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pålsson J, Selimovic A, Sjunnesson L (2000). Combined solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine system for efficient power and heat generation. Journal of Power Sources, 86, 442–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proell T, Rauch R, Aichering C, Hofbauer H (2004). Coupling of biomass steam gasification and an SOFC-GT hybrid system for highly efficient electricity generation. ASME Turbo Expo Proceeding, GT2004-53900, 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raja AK, Srivastava AP, Dwivedi M (2006). Power plant engineering. New Age International (P) Ltd, 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rattenbury N, Fort E (2006). Development of requirements for fuel cells in the marine environment performance and prescription. Lloyd’s Register Technical Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokni M (2010a). Thermodynamic analysis of an integrated solid oxide fuel cell cycle with a rankine cycle. Energy Conversion and Management, 51, 2724–2732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokni M (2010b). Plant characteristics of an integrated solid oxide fuel cell cycle and a steam cycle. Energy, 35, 4691–4699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santin M, Traverso A, Magistri L, Massardo A (2010). Thermo economic analysis of SOFC-GT hybrid systems fed by liquid fuels. Journal of Energy, 35, 1077–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöstedt CJ, Chen DJ (2009). Virtual component testing for pem fuel cell systems: an efficient, high-quality and safe approach for suppliers and OEM’s. 3 rd European PEFC Forum, Session B09.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subhash CS, and Kevin K (ed.) (2004). High temperature solid oxide fuel cells: fundamentals, design and applications. Elsevier Advanced Technology, The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington Oxford OX5 lGB, UK, 1856173879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanyan K, Diwekar UM (2005). Characterization and quantification of uncertainty in solid oxide fuel cell hybrid power plants. Journal of Power Sources, 142, 103–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wächter C, Lunderstädt R, Joos F (2006). Dynamic model of a pressurized SOFC-GT hybrid power plant for the development of control concept. Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology, 3(3), 271–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welaya YMA, El Gohary MM, Ammar NR (2011). A comparison between fuel cells and other alternatives for marine electric power generation. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering (JNAOE), 3, 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodyard D (2004). Pounder’s marine diesel engines and gas turbines. 8th edition, Elsevier, 0 7506 5846 0, 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yousri M. A. Welaya.

Additional information

Yousri M. A. Welaya is an emeritus professor at the Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, Alexandria University. Current research work includes the dynamic behavior of damaged semi-submersibles, environmental loading on offshore structures and energy management options in marine power plants.

M. Mosleh is a professor at the Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, Alexandria University. Current research work includes automatic control applications in the marine field, advanced marine diesel engines, marine power plants and marine engineering.

Nader R. Ammar is a PhD candidate with the Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University. He is a teaching assistant at The Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering. His current research interests include fuel cell applications in the marine field, renewable energy and modern marine power plants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Welaya, Y.M.A., Mosleh, M. & Ammar, N.R. Energy analysis of a combined solid oxide fuel cell with a steam turbine power plant for marine applications. J. Marine. Sci. Appl. 12, 473–483 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-013-1219-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-013-1219-5

Keywords

Navigation