Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Polyphagy and primary host plants: oviposition preference versus larval performance in the lepidopteran pest Helicoverpa armigera

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oviposition preference and several measures of offspring performance of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) were investigated on a subset of its host plants that were selected for their reputed importance in the field in Australia. They included cotton, pigeon pea, sweet corn, mungbean, bean and common sowthistle. Plants were at their flowering stage when presented to gravid female moths. Flowering pigeon pea evoked far more oviposition than did the other plant species and was the most preferred plant for neonate larval feeding. It also supported development of the most robust larvae and pupae, and these produced the most fecund moths. Common sowthistle and cotton were equally suitable to pigeon pea for larval development, but these two species received far fewer H. armigera eggs than did pigeon pea. Mungbean also received relatively few eggs, but it did support intermediate measures of larval growth and survival. Fewest eggs were laid on bean and it was also the least beneficial in terms of larval growth. Among the host plant species tested, only flowering pigeon pea supported a good relationship between oviposition preference of H. armigera and its subsequent offspring performance. Australian H. armigera moths are thus consistent with Indian H. armigera moths in their ovipositional behaviour and larval performance relative to pigeon pea. The results suggest that the host recognition and acceptance behaviour of this species is fixed across its geographical distribution and they support the theory that pigeon pea might be one of the primary host plants of this insect. These insights, together with published results on the sensory responses of the females to volatiles derived from the different host plant species tested here, help to explain why some plant species are primary targets for the ovipositing moths whereas others are only secondary targets of this polyphagous pest, which has a notoriously broad host range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abate T (1988) Experiments with trap crops against African bollworm, Heliothis armigera, in Ethiopia. Entomol Exp Appl 48:135–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Chapman RE (1994) Host selection by phytophagous insects. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 1–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaney WM, Simmonds MSJ (1990) The role of chemicals from legumes in mediating host selection by adults and larvae of Helicoverpa armigera: a behavioural and electrophysiological study. In: Pimbert MP, Wightman JA (eds) First consultative group meeting of host selection behaviour of Helicoverpa armigera. ICRISAT Centre, Patancheru, pp 11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce TJ, Cork A (2001) Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of female Helicoverpa armigera to compounds identified in flowers of African marigold, Tagetes erecta. J Chem Ecol 27:1119–1131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burguiere L, Marion-Poll F, Cork A (2001) Electrophysiological responses of female Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to synthetic host odours. J Insect Physiol 47:509–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo-Chavez CSA, Gould F (1988) Physiological and behavioral adaptation to varying environments: a mathematical model. Evolution 42:986–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cates RG (1981) Host plant predictability and the feeding patterns of monophagous, oligophagous, and polyphagous insect herbivores. Oecologia 48:319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson BR, Davidson HF (eds) (1993) Legumes: the Australian experience. The botany, ecology and agriculture of indigenous and immigrant legumes. In: The early legumes. Research Studies Press, Somerset, pp 1–27

  • Duke AJ (1981) Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. Handbook of legumes of world economic importance. Plenum Press, New York, pp 33–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Firempong S, Zalucki MP (1990) Host plant selection by Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) – role of certain plant attributes. Aust J Zool 37:675–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitt GP (1989) The ecology of Heliothis species in relation to agroecosystems. Annu Rev Entomol 34:17–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitt GP, Daly JC (1990) Abundance of overwintering pupae and the spring generation of Helicoverpa spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Northern New South Wales, Australia: implications for pest management. J Econ Entomol 83:1827–1836

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitt GP, Tann C (1996) Quantifying the value of refuges for resistance management of transgenic Bt cotton. In: Proceedings of the eighth Australian cotton conference, Aug. 1996, Broadbeach, Queensland. Australian Cotton Grower’s Research Association, Wee Waa, New South Wales, pp 77–83

  • Futuyma DJ (1976) Food plant specialisation and environmental predictability in Lepidoptera. Am Nat 111:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal SP, Rathore VS (1988) Patterns of insect-plant relationship determining susceptibility of different hosts to Heliothis armigera Hubner. Indian J Entomol 50:193–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Green PWC, Stevenson PC, Simmonds MSJ, Sharma HC (2002) Can larvae of the pod-borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), select between wild and cultivated pigeon pea Cajanus sp. (Fabaceae)? Bull Entomol Res 92:45–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gu H, Walter GH (1999) Is the common sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus) a primary host plant of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lep., Noctuidae)? Oviposition and larval performance. J Appl Entomol 123:99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardwick DF (1965) The corn earworm complex. Mem Entomol Soc Can 40:1–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartlieb E, Rembold H (1996) Behavioural response of female Helicoverpa (Heliothis) armigera HB. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) moths to synthetic pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) kairomone. J Chem Ecol 22:821–837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jallow MFA, Zalucki MP (1996) Within-and between-population variation in host-plant preference and specificity in Australian Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Aust J Zool 44:503–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jallow MFA, Matsumura M, Suzuki Y (2001) Oviposition preference and reproductive performance of Japanese Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Appl Entomol Zool 36:419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeyaraj S (1981) Biological and ecological studies of Heliothis. In: Reed W, Kumble V (eds) Proceedings of the international workshop on Heliothis management. ICRISAT Centre, Patancheru, pp 17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakimoto T, Fujisaki K, Miyatake T (2003) Egg laying preference, larval dispersion and cannibalism in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 96:793–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lateef SS, Reed W (1990) Insect pests of pigeon pea. In: Singh SR (ed) Insect pests of tropical food legumes. Wiley, New York, pp 193–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Manjunath TM, Bhatnagar VS, Pawar CS, Sitanantham S (1985) Economic importance of Heliothis spp. in India and an assessment of their natural enemies and host plants. In: King EG, Jackson RD (eds) Proceedings of workshop on biological control of Heliothis: increasing the effectiveness of natural enemies, November 1985. Far Eastern Region Research Office, USDA, New Delhi, pp 11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews M (1991) Classification of the Heliothinae (NRI Bulletin No 44). Natural Resources Institute, Chatham, UK, 198 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews M (1999) Heliothine moths of Australia: a guide to pest bollworms and related Noctuid groups. Monographs on Australian Lepidoptera, vol 7. CSIRO, Collingwood, pp 8–134

  • Milne M, Walter GH (2000) Feeding and breeding across host plants within a locality by the widespread thrips Frankliniella schultzei, and the invasive potential of polyphagous herbivores. Diversity and Distribution 6:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitter C, Poole RW, Matthews M (1993) Biosystematics of the Heliothinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Annu Rev Entomol 38:207–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton JF (1976) The pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan Millsp.), a high-protein, tropical legume. Hort Sci 11:11–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Mound LA, Teulon DAJ (1995) Thysanoptera as phytophagous opportunists. In: Parker BL, Skinner M, Lewis T (eds) Thrips biology and management. Plenum Press, New York, pp 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretorius LM (1976) Laboratory studies on the developmental and reproductive performance of Heliothis armigera (Hübn) on various food plants. J Entomol Soc S Afr 39:337–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajapakse CNK, Walter GH, Moore CJ, Hull CD, Cribb BW (2006) Host recognition by a polyphagous lepidopteran (Helicoverpa armigera): primary host plants, host produced volatiles and neurosensory stimulation. Physiol Entomol 31:270–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed W, Pawar CS (1982) Heliothis: a global problem. In: Reed W, Kumble V (eds) Proceedings of the international workshop on Heliothis management. ICRISAT Centre, Patancheru, pp 9–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Rembold H, Tober H (1985) Kairomones as pigeonpea resistance factors against Heliothis armigera. Insect Sci Appl 6:249–252

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rembold H, Schroth A, Lateef SS, Weigner C (1990) Semiochemicals and host plant selection by Helicoverpa armigera: basic studies in the laboratory for the field. In: Pimbert MP, Wightman JA (eds) Host selection behaviour of Helicoverpa armigera. ICRISAT Centre, Patancheru, pp 23–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Røstelien T, Stranden M, Borg-Karlson A-K, Mustaparta H (2005) Olfactory receptor neurons in two heliothine moth species responding selectively to aliphatic green leaf volatiles, aromatic compounds, monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes of plant origin. Chem Sens 30:443–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sequeira R (2001) Inter-seasonal population dynamics and cultural management of Helicoverpa spp. in a central Queensland cropping system. Aust J Exp Agric 41:249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sequeira R, Playford CL (2001) Abundance of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) pupae under cotton and other crops in central Queensland: implications for resistance management. Aust J Entomol 40:264–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanower TG, Yoshida M, Peter AJ (1997) Survival, growth, fecundity and behavior of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on pigeonpea and two wild Cajanus species. J Econ Entomol 90:837–841

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanower TG, Romeis J, Minja EM (1999) Insect pests of pigeon pea and their management. Annu Rev Entomol 44:77–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma HC, Green PWC, Stevenson PC, Simmonds MSJ (2001) What make it tasty for the pest? Identification of Helicoverpa armigera feeding stimulants and location of their production on the pod surface of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.). Comparative Research Facility Project R7029C, Final Technical Report, Department for International Development, UK

  • Shel’Deshova GG (1967) Ecological factors determining distribution of the codling moth Laspeyresia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in the northern and southern hemispheres. Entomol Rev 46:349–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Teakle RE, Jensen JM (1985) Heliothis punctiger. In: Singh P, Moore RE (eds) Handbook of insect rearing. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 313–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN (1993) Preference hierarchies and the origin of geographic specialization in host use in swallowtail butterflies. Evolution 47:1585–1594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Maesen LJG (1990) Pigeon pea: origin, history, evolution and taxonomy. In: Nene YL, Hall SD, Sheila VK (eds) The pigeon pea. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 15–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavilov NI (1992) Origin and geography of cultivated plants (ed Love TBD). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 326–351

  • Velasco LRL, Walter GH (1992) Availability of different host plant species and changing abundance of the polyphagous bug Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Environ Entomol 21:751–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon RW (1976) Pigeon pea. In: Simmonds NW (ed) Evolution of crop plants. Longmans, London, pp 154–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldvogel M, Gould F (1990) Variation in oviposition preference of Heliothis virescens in relation to macroevolutionary patterns of Heliothinae host range. Evolution 44:1326–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter GH (2003) Insect pest management and ecological research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 115–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter GH, Benfield MD (1994) Temporal host plant use in three polyphagous Heliothinae, with special reference to Helicoverpa punctigera (Wallengren) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera). Aust J Ecol 19:458–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter GH, Paterson HEH (1994) The implication of palaeontological evidence for theories of ecological communities and species richness. Aust J Ecol 19:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C (1981) Generalist vs. specialist oviposition behaviour in Papilio machaon (Lepidoptera) and functional aspects on the hierarchy of oviposition preferences. Oikos 36:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalucki MP, Daglish G, Firempong S, Twine P (1986) The biology and ecology of Heliothis armigera (Hübner) and H. punctigera Wallengren (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Australia: what do we know? Aust J Zool 34:779–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank two anonymous reviewers on their perceptive comments on the interpretation of the results and presentation of the material.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Integrative Biology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD , 4072, Australia

    C. N. K. Rajapakse & G. H. Walter

Authors
  1. C. N. K. Rajapakse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. H. Walter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. N. K. Rajapakse.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Joseph Dickens

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajapakse, C.N.K., Walter, G.H. Polyphagy and primary host plants: oviposition preference versus larval performance in the lepidopteran pest Helicoverpa armigera . Arthropod-Plant Interactions 1, 17–26 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-007-9003-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-007-9003-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation