Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of peroxidase changes in resistant and susceptible warm-season turfgrasses challenged by Blissus occiduus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peroxidases play an important role in plant stress related interactions. This research assessed the role of peroxidases in the defense response of resistant and susceptible buffalograsses [Buchloe dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm] and zoysiagrasses (Zoysia japonica Steudel) to the western chinch bug, Blissus occiduus Barber. The objectives were: (1) to assess the relationships among protein content, basal peroxidase levels, chinch bug injury, and ploidy levels of chinch bug-resistant and -susceptible buffalograsses; (2) to compare peroxidase activity levels of resistant and susceptible buffalograsses and zoysiagrasses in response to chinch bug feeding; (3) and to analyze extracted proteins from chinch bug-resistant and -susceptible buffalograsses and zoysiagrasses by native gel electrophoresis to obtain information on the peroxidase profiles. Correlation analyses of 28 buffalograss genotypes with varying levels of chinch bug resistance and ploidy levels indicated that buffalograss total protein content was correlated (r = 0.47, P = 0.01) to chinch bug injury, while basal peroxidase levels was not (r = 0.19, P = 0.29), suggesting that the up-regulation of peroxidases in resistant buffalograsses is a direct response to chinch bug feeding. Three of the four chinch bug-resistant buffalograss genotypes evaluated had higher peroxidase activity in the infested plants compared to control plants. Peroxidase activity levels were similar between infested and control plants of the two highly susceptible buffalograss genotypes. Zoysiagrasses had lower peroxidase activity in general when compared to buffalograss control plants, and only ‘Zorro’ consistently showed higher peroxidase activity in the infested plants. Native gel electrophoresis analysis identified differences in the isozyme profiles of infested and control buffalograsses ‘Prestige’ and 196, and the zoysiagrass ‘Zorro’. Results from this study suggest that peroxidases have the potential to be used as markers for selecting chinch bug resistant turfgrasses, and may help explain how plants defend themselves against biotic stresses, such as chinch bugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison SD, Schultz JC (2004) Differential activity of peroxidase isozymes in response to wounding, gypsy moth and plant hormones in northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.). J Chem Ecol 30:1363–1379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baxendale FP, Heng-Moss TM, Riordan TP (1999) Blissus occiduus (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae): a chinch bug pest new to buffalograss turf. J Econ Entomol 92:1172–1176

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird RD, Mitchner AV (1950) Insects of the season 1949 in Manitoba. Can Insect Pest Rev 28:41

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo FJ, Penel C, Greppin H (1984) Peroxide release induced by ozone in Sedum album leaves: involvement of Ca2+. Plant Physiol 74:846–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd PF, Holmes RA, Pinkerton TS et al (2006) Relative activity of a tobacco hybrid expressing high levels of a tobacco anionic peroxidase and maize ribosome-inactivating protein against Helicoverpa zea and Lasioderma serricorne. J Agric Food Chem 54:2629–2634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eickhoff TE, Baxendale FP, Heng-Moss TM et al (2004) Turfgrass, crop and weed hosts Blissus occiduus (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). J Econ Entomol 97:67–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eickhoff TE, Heng-Moss TM, Baxendale FP (2006) Host preference of the chinch bug, Blissus occiduus. J Insect Sci 6:07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eickhoff TE, Heng-Moss TM, Baxendale FP et al (2008) Levels of tolerance, antibiosis, and antixenosis among resistant buffalograsses and zoysiagrasses. J Econ Entomol 101:533–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farstad CW, Staff A (1951) Insects of the season in Alberta, 1950. Can Insect Pest Rev 29:18

    Google Scholar 

  • Felton GW, Bi JL, Summers CB (1994a) Potential role of lipoxygenases in defense against insect herbivory. J Chem Ecol 20:651–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Felton GW, Summers CB, Mueller AJ (1994b) Oxidative responses in soybean foliage to herbivory by bean leaf beetle and three-corned alfalfa leafhopper. J Chem Ecol 20:639–650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris GF (1920) Insects of economic importance in the cape region of lower California, Mexico. J Econ Entomol 13:463–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulsen O, Heng-Moss TM, Shearman R et al (2004) Buffalograss germplasm resistance to Blissus occiduus (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). J Econ Entomol 96:2101–2105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulsen O, Shearman RC, Vogel KP et al (2005) Nuclear genome diversity and relationships among naturally occurring buffalograss genotypes determined by sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers. HortScience 40:537–541

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gulsen O, Shearman RC, Heng-Moss TM et al (2007) Peroxidase gene polymorphism in buffalograss and other grasses. Crop Sci 47:767–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gutsche A, Heng-Moss T, Sarath G et al (2009) Gene expression profiling of tolerant barley in response to Diuraphis noxia (Hemiptera: Aphididae) feeding. Bull Entomol Res 99:163–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heng-Moss TM, Baxendale FP, Riordan TP et al (2002) Evaluation of buffalograss germplasm for resistance to Blissus occiduus turf. J Econ Entomol 95:1054–1058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heng-Moss TM, Baxendale FP, Riordan TP (2003) Chinch bug-resistant buffalograss: an investigation of tolerance, antixenosis and antibiosis. J Econ Entomol 96:1942–1951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heng-Moss TM, Sarath G, Baxendale FP et al (2004) Characterization of oxidative enzyme changes in buffalograsses challenged by Blissus occiduus. J Econ Entomol 97:1086–1095

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heng-Moss TM, Macedo T, Franzen L et al (2006) Physiological responses of resistant and susceptible buffalograsses to Blissus occiduus (Hempitera: Blissidae) feeding. J Econ Entomol 99:222–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand DF, Rodriguez JG, Brown GC (1986) Peroxidative responses of leaves in two soybean genotypes injured by twospotted spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae). J Econ Entomol 79:1459–1465

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiraga S, Sasaki K, Ito H et al (2001) A large family of Class III peroxidases. Plant Cell Physiol 42:462–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2002) Plant responses to insect herbivory: the emerging molecular analysis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:299–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mavelli I, Rigo A, Federico R et al (1982) Superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase and catalase in developing rat brain. Biochem J 204:535–540

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ni X, Quisenberry SS, Heng-Moss TM et al (2001) Oxidative responses of resistant and susceptible cereal leaves to symptomatic and nonsymptomatic cereal Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) feeding. J Econ Entomol 94(3):743–751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker JR (1920) The chinch bug in Montana. J Econ Entomol 13:318–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Passardi F, Cosio C, Penel C et al (2005) Peroxidases have more functions than a Swiss army knife. Plant Cell Rep 24:255–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2002) SAS/STAT software changes and enhancements through release 9. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk PM, Kazan K, Wilson I et al (2000) Coordinated plant defense responses in Arabidopsis revealed by microarray analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:11655–11660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slater JA (1964) A catalogue of the Lygaeidae of the world. University of Connecticut, Storrs

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallejos CE (1983) Enzyme activity staining. In: Tanksley SD, Orton TJ (eds), Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding, part A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 469–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon LC (1976) Systemic acquired resistance, peroxidase activity and lesion size in tobacco reacting hypersensitively to tobacco mosaic virus. Physiol Plant Pathol 8:231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welinder KG, Justesen I, Kjaersgard VH et al (2002) Structural diversity and transcription of class III peroxidases from Arabidopsis thaliana. Eur J Biochem 269:6063–6081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willekens H, Langebartels C, Tire C et al (1994) Differential expression of catalase genes in Nictotiana plumbaginifolia (L.). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:10450–10454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Kirkham MB (1994) Drought-stress-induced changes in activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase in wheat species. Plant Cell Physiol 35:758–791

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Paul Nabity, Herbert Siqueira, Mitch Stamm, Sandra Schaeffer, and Andrea Gutsche for technical assistance. This research was supported in part by the University of Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station Projects NEB-28-097, NEB-22-331, AND NEB-28-092, the United States Golf Association, and the Nebraska Turfgrass Association.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiffany Heng-Moss.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Henryk Czosnek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gulsen, O., Eickhoff, T., Heng-Moss, T. et al. Characterization of peroxidase changes in resistant and susceptible warm-season turfgrasses challenged by Blissus occiduus . Arthropod-Plant Interactions 4, 45–55 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-010-9086-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-010-9086-3

Keywords

Navigation