Abstract
Developments in the numerical modeling of stamping processes and experimental measurements now make it possible to design stamping processes using sound engineering principles. This article shows how experimental and theoretical contributions have led to the concept of a forming window in strain space that identifies the strains that can be developed safely in a sheet element. It is bounded by failure limits corresponding to localized necking, shear fracture, and wrinkling. A robust stamping process is one in which the strains in the part lie well within the forming window. The nature of the window and the influence of material behavior on its shape can be predicted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J.D. Embury and J.L. Duncan, Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci., 11 (1981), pp. 505–521.
W.T. Lankford, J.R. Low, and M. Gensamer, Trans. AIME, 171 (1947), p. 574.
R. Hill, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1 (1952), pp. 19–30.
S.P. Keeler and W.A. Backofen, ASM Trans. Q., 56 (1963), pp. 25–48.
S.P. Keeler, SAE paper 680092 (Warrendale, PA: SAE, 1968).
G. Goodwin, SAE paper 680093 (Warrendale, PA: SAE, 1968).
S.S. Hecker, Sheet Metal Ind., 52 (1975), pp. 671–675.
A.K. Ghosh, Met. Eng. Q., 15 (3) (1975), pp. 53–64.
Z. Marciniak and J.L. Duncan, Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming (London: Edward Arnold, 1992).
Z. Marciniak, Archiwum Mechanikj Stosowanej, 4 (1965), p. 579.
Z. Marciniak and K. Kuczynski, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 9 (1967), p. 609.
A. Parmar and P.B. Mellor, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 20 (1978), pp. 2067–2074.
D. Lee and F. Zaverl, Jr., Int. J. Mech. Sci., 24 (1982), pp. 157–173.
K.S. Chan, Met. Trans., 16A (1985), pp. 629–639.
R. Sowerby and J.L. Duncan, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 3 (1971), pp. 217–129.
R. Hill, Proc. Roy. Soc., 193A (1948), p. 281.
W.F. Hosford, Proc. 7th North Am. Metalworking Conf. (Dearborn, MI: SME, 1979), pp. 1912–1916.
R.L. Logan and W.F. Hosford, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 22 (1980), pp. 419–430.
A.F. Graf and W.F. Hosford, Metall. Trans., 21A (1990), p. 87–94.
F. Barlat, Forming Limit Diagrams: Concepts, Methods and Applications, ed. R.H. Wagoner, K.S. Chan, and S.P. Keeler (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1989), p. 275.
D.V. Wilson and O. Acselrad, Proc. IDDRG 10th Biennial Congress (Redhill, U.K.: Portcullis Press, 1978), pp. 155–166.
D.V. Wilson, W.T. Roberts, and P.M.B. Rodrigues, Metall. Trans., 12A (1981), pp. 1595–1602.
T.J. McCarron et al., Metall. Trans., 19A (1988), pp. 2067–2074.
H. van Minh, R. Sowerby, and J.L. Duncan, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 16 (1974), p. 31.
H. van Minh, R. Sowerby, and J.L. Duncan, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 16 (1974), p. 339.
J.E. Bird and J.L. Duncan, Metall. Trans., 12A, (1981), pp. 235–241.
G.H. LeRoy and J.D. Embury, Formability: Analysis, Modeling and Experimentation, ed. S.S. Hecker, A.K. Ghosh, and H.L. Gegel (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1978), pp. 183–207.
A.F. Graf and W.F. Hosford, Metall. Trans., 24A (1993), pp. 2497–2501.
A.F. Graf and W.F. Hosford, Metall. Trans., 24A (1993), pp. 2503–2512.
S.P. Keeler, Microalloying 75 (New York: Union Carbide, 1977), pp. 517–530.
K.S. Raghavan, Report to the FLC Users group of NADDRG (1991).
P.E. Smith and D. Lee, Proc. International Body Engineering Conference (Detroit, MI: SAE, 1998), pp. 121–128.
J. Havranek, Sheet Metal Forming and Energy Conservation(Metals Park, OH: ASM, 1976), pp. 245–263.
R. Whitely, Trans. ASM, 52 (1960), p. 154.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Editor’s Note: A hypertext-enhanced version of this article can be found at www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/9911/Hosford-9911.html.
For more information, contact W.F. Hosford, University of Michigan, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 2300 Hayward Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2136; (734) 764-3371; fax (734) 763-4788; e-mail whosford@umich.edu.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hosford, W.F., Duncan, J.L. Sheet metal forming: A review. JOM 51, 39–44 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-999-0221-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-999-0221-5