Skip to main content
Log in

Envy-free cake division without assuming the players prefer nonempty pieces

  • Published:
Israel Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consider n players having preferences over the connected pieces of a cake, identified with the interval [0, 1]. A classical theorem, found independently by Stromquist and by Woodall in 1980, ensures that, under mild conditions, it is possible to divide the cake into n connected pieces and assign these pieces to the players in an envy-free manner, i.e., such that no player strictly prefers a piece that has not been assigned to her. One of these conditions, considered as crucial, is that no player is happy with an empty piece. We prove that, even if this condition is not satisfied, it is still possible to get such a division when n is a prime number or is equal to 4. When n is at most 3, this has been previously proved by Erel Segal- Halevi, who conjectured that the result holds for any n. The main step in our proof is a new combinatorial lemma in topology, close to a conjecture by Segal-Halevi and which is reminiscent of the celebrated Sperner lemma: instead of restricting the labels that can appear on each face of the simplex, the lemma considers labelings that enjoy a certain symmetry on the boundary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. N. Andersen, M. M. Marjanović and R. M. Schori, Symmetric products and higherdimensional dunce hats, Topology Proceedings 18 (1993), 7–17.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Asada, F. Frick, V. Pisharody, M. Polevy, D. Stoner, L. H. Tsang and Z. Wellner, Fair division and generalizations of Sperner- and KKM-type results, SIAM Journal of Discrete Mathematics 32 (2018), 591–610.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. V. Bil´o, I. Caragiannis, M. Flammini, A. Igarashi, G. Monaco, D. Peters, C. Vinci and W. S. Zwicker, Almost envy-free allocations with connected bundles, in 10th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, Vol. 124, Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum f¨ur Informatik, Dagstuhl, 2018, pp. 14:1–14:21.

    Google Scholar 

  4. X. Chen and X. Deng, On the complexity of 2D discrete fixed point problem, Theoretical Computer Science 410 (2009), 4448–4456.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. J. A. De Loera, X. Goaoc, F. Meunier and N. Mustafa, The discrete yet ubiquitous theorems of Carathéodory, Helly, Sperner, Tucker, and Tverberg, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 56 (2019), 415–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. X. Deng, Q. Qi and A. Saberi, Algorithmic solutions for envy-free cake cutting, Operations Research 60 (2012), 1461–1476.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Frick, K. Houston-Edwards and F. Meunier, Achieving rental harmony with a secretive roommate, The American Mathematical Monthly 126 (2019), 18–32.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Kannai, Using oriented volume to prove Sperner’s lemma, Economic Theory Bulletin 1 (2013), 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Kir´aly and J. Pap, PPAD-completeness of polyhedral versions of Sperner’s Lemma, Discrete Mathematics 313 (2013), 1594–1599.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. D. N. Kozlov, Topology of scrambled simplices, Journal of Homotopy and Related Structures 14 (2019), 371–391.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. A. McLennan and R. Tourky, Using volume to prove Sperner’s lemma, Economic Theory 35 (2008), 593–597.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Mirzakhani and J. Vondr´ak, Sperner’s colorings, hypergraph labeling problems and fair division, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2015, pp. 873–886.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. J. R. Munkres, Elements of Algebraic Topology, Vol. 2, Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. E. Segal-Halevi, Fairly dividing a cake after some parts were burnt in the oven, in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, IFAAMAS, pp. 1276–1284, http://www.ifaamas.org/Proceedings/aamas2018/pdfs/p1276.pdf.

  15. F. W. Simmons and F. E. Su, Consensus-halving via theorems of Borsuk–Ulam and Tucker, Mathematical Social Sciences 45 (2003), 15–25.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. W. Stromquist, How to cut a cake fairly, The AmericanMathematical Monthly 87 (1980), 640–644.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. F. E. Su, Rental harmony: Sperner’s lemma in fair division, The American Mathematical Monthly 106 (1999), 930–942.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. D. R. Woodall, Dividing a cake fairly, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 78 (1980), 233–247.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the referee for his thorough reading and his suggestions and questions that helped improve the paper.

This work has been initiated when the authors were in residence at the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute in Berkeley, California, during the Fall 2017 semester. This material is thus partially based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DMS-1440140.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shira Zerbib.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meunier, F., Zerbib, S. Envy-free cake division without assuming the players prefer nonempty pieces. Isr. J. Math. 234, 907–925 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-019-1939-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-019-1939-6

Navigation