Skip to main content
Log in

Making practice studyable

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A common way to situate professional learning in practice is to use representations of teaching, such as videos of classroom instruction or samples of student work. Using representations of teaching, however, does not automatically lead to teacher learning. Learning in and from practice also requires supports that make such practice studyable. The authors introduce and explore the work of “making practice studyable” by analyzing a case of practice-based professional development in which the professional development designers deliberately tried to mediate participants’ learning in and from practice. From this analysis, the authors identified five categories of work that can help make practice studyable: (1) engaging the content, (2) providing insight into student thinking, (3) orienting to the instructional context, (4) providing lenses for viewing, and (5) developing a disposition of inquiry. These categories are then applied to the use of a representation of mathematics teaching in a course for preservice elementary teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The episode is based on a lesson designed and taught by the Mathematics Methods Planning Group at the University of Michigan School of Education.

References

  • Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In B. Davis & E. Simmt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group. Edmonton, AB: CMESG/GCEDM.

  • Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., Raudenbush, S., & Ball, D. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, C., Cannon, J., & Chokshi, S. (2003). A US–Japan lesson study collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, P., & Chazan, D. (2011). Representation of mathematics teaching: introduction to this special issue. ZDM, 43(1–2)

  • Hutchins, E. (1996). Learning to navigate. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 35–63). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., Borko, H., Schneider, C., Pittman, M. E., Eiteljorg, E., et al. (2007). The problem-solving cycle: A model to support the development of teachers’ professional knowledge. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 273–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M., & Ball, D. L. (1998). Mathematics, teaching, and multimedia: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (2007). Teaching as invisible work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

  • Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. S. (2001). Practice-based professional development for teachers of mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuka, K., Sleep, L., Ball, D. L., Bass, H., Lewis, J., & Thames, M. (2009). Designing and using tasks to teach mathematical knowledge for teaching. In D. Mewborn & H. Lee (Eds.), Scholarly practices and inquiry in the preparation of mathematics teachers. San Diego, CA: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant #0227586 to the Center for Proficiency in Teaching Mathematics). The authors would like to thank the CPTM Summer Institute planners and participants, as well as the preservice teachers who participated in the laboratory class. We also thank Ed Silver, Jeremy Kilpatrick, Magdalene Lampert, Deborah Ball, and Francesca Forzani for their feedback on earlier drafts of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hala Ghousseini.

Additional information

The opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the foundation.

The order of authorship is alphabetical; both authors contributed equally to the development of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghousseini, H., Sleep, L. Making practice studyable. ZDM Mathematics Education 43, 147–160 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0280-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0280-7

Keywords

Navigation