Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Decompressive percutaneous gastrostomy tube use in gynecologic malignancies

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement is a technically feasible and safe procedure for palliation in patients with small bowel obstruction (SBO) caused by advanced gynecologic malignancies. It is used commonly in patients who are poor surgical candidates, those who elect to not undergo surgery, and in patients with a limited lifespan because of end-stage cancer. Percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement is even technically possible in patients with tumor encasing the stomach, diffuse carcinomatosis, and ascites. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes provide symptomatic relief of nausea and vomiting in most patients with advanced gynecologic cancer and SBO. PEG tube placement allows most patients to have end-of-life care at home or in an inpatient hospice. It is a cost effective procedure and is associated with low morbidity and mortality. Placement of PEG tubes should be highly considered in patients who present with recurrent bowel obstruction and who have undergone a prior operation for SBO in the setting of advanced gynecologic malignancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Baines MJ: The pathophysiology and management of malignant intestinal obstruction. In Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine. Edited by Doyle D, Hanks GWC, MacDonald N. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998:526–534.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Storey PS: Obstruction of the GI tract. Am J Hospice Palliat Care 1991, 8:5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mystakidou K, Tsilika E, Kalaidopoulou O, Papadimitriou L: Comparison of octreotide administration vs conservative treatment in the management of inoperable bowel obstruction in patients with far advanced cancer: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Anticancer Res 2002, 22:1187–1192.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mercadante S, Ripamonti C, Casuccio A, et al.:Comparison of ocreotide and hyoscine butylbromide in controlling gastrointestinal symptoms due to malignant inoperable bowel obstruction. Support Care Cancer 2000, 8:188–191.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mangigi G, Aletti G, Frigerio L, et al.: Palliative care for intestinal obstruction in recurrent ovarian cancer: a multivariate analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005, 15:830–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pothuri B, Vaidya A, Aghajanian C, et al.: Palliative surgery for bowel obstruction in recurrent ovarian cancer: an updated series. Gynecol Oncol 2003, 89:306–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pothuri B, Meyer L, Gerardi M, et al.: Reoperation for palliation of recurrent malignant bowel obstruction in ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2004, 95:193–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Campagnutta E, Cannizzaro R: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in palliative treatment of non-operable intestinal obstruction due to gynecologic cancer: a review. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2000, 4:397–402. This review provides useful background data regarding PEG tube placement and includes smaller studies that are not present in this paper.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ponsky JL, Gauderer MW: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a nonoperative technique for feeding gastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1981, 27:9–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Malone JM Jr, Koonce T, Larson DM, et al.: Palliation of small bowel obstruction by percutaneous gastrostomy in patients with progressive ovarian carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1986, 68:431–433.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stellato TA, Gauderer MW: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for gastrointestinal decompression. Ann Surg 1987, 205:119–122.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Levin DC, Matteucci T: “Turf battles” over imaging and interventional procedures in community hospitals: survey results. Radiology 1990, 176:321–324.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wollman B, D’Agostino HB, Walus-Wigle JR, et al.:Radiolgoic, endoscopic, and surgical gastrostomy: an institutional evaluation and meta-analsysis of the literature. Radiology 1995, 197:669–704.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffer EK, Cosgrove JM, Levin DQ, et al.: Radiologic gastrojejunostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a prospective, randomized comparison. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999, 10:413–420.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Silas AM, Pearce LF, Lestina LS, et al.: Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy versus percutaneous enodscopic gastrostomy: a comparison of indications, complications and outcomes in 370 patients. Eur J Radiol 2005, 56:84–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cannizzaro R, Bortoluzzi F, Valentini M, et al.: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy as a decompressive technique in bowel obstruction due to abdominal carcinomatosis. Endoscopy 1995, 27:317–320.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bleck JS, Reiss B, Gebel M, et al.: Percutaneous sonographic gastrostomy: method, indications, and problems. Am J Gastroenterol 1998, 93:941–945.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee MJ, Saini S, Brink JA, et al.: Maligant small bowel obstruction and ascites: not a contraindication to percutaneous gastrostomy. Clin Radiol 1991, 44:332–334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. PothuriB, Montemarano M, Gerardi M, et al.: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with malignant bowel obstruction due to ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2005, 96:330–334. This is the largest single series of PEG tube placement in patients with malignant obstruction from a gynecologic malignancy and has the most thorough follow-up data.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ryan JM, Hahn PF, Mueller PR: Performing radiologic gastrostomy or gastrojejunostomy in patients with malignant ascites. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998, 171:1003–1006.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cunningham MJ, Bromberg C, Kredentser D, et al.:Percutaneous gastrostomy for decompression in patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 1995, 59:273–276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Campagnutta E, Cannizzao R, Gallo A, et al.: Palliative treatment of upper intestinal obstruction by gynecological malignancy: the usefulness of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Gynecol Oncol 1996, 62:103–105. This series, although small, has good follow-up data and discusses the use of octreotide in conjunction with PEG tube for symptomatic relief.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Ryan JA: When push comes to shove: a comparison between two methods of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Am J Gastroenterol 1986, 81:642–646.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Marks WH, Perkal M, Swhwartz P: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for gastric decompression in metastatic gynecologic malignancies. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993, 177:573–576.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gossner L, Keymling J, Hahn EG, et al.: Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): a prospective randomized clinical trial. Endoscopy 1999, 31:119–124.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kulling D, Sonnenberg A, Fried M, et al.: Cost analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis for PEG. Gastrointest Endosc 2000, 51:152–156.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Herman L, Hoskins W, Shike M: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for decompression of the stomach and small bowel. Gastrointest Endosc 1992, 38:314–318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Galat SA, Gerig KD, Porter JA, et al.:Management of premature removal of the percutaneous gastrostomy. Am Surg 1990, 56:733–736.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Calton W, Martindale R, Gooden S: Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Mil Med 1992, 157:358–360.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Campagnutta E, Cannizzao R: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in palliate treatment of non-operable intestinal obstruction due to gynecologic cancer: a review. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2000, 21:397–402.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, Herbert Irving Pavilion, 8-837, 10032, New York, NY, USA

    Bhavana Pothuri MD

Authors
  1. Larissa Meyer MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bhavana Pothuri MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, L., Pothuri, B. Decompressive percutaneous gastrostomy tube use in gynecologic malignancies. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 7, 111–120 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-006-0046-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-006-0046-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation