Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Posterior Urethral Valves

  • Pediatric Bladder Dysfunction (SJ Hodges, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Posterior urethral valves (PUV) are the most common cause of lower urinary tract obstruction in male infants. Due to improved technique and availability of prenatal imaging, diagnosis is typically suspected prenatally and confirmed postnatally. Prenatal intervention is performed in select centers with vesicoamniotic shunting or with fetal cystoscopy and antegrade ablation of the PUV when detected. Prenatal intervention has been associated with an improvement in neonatal survival; however, evidence that renal function is indeed improved remains scant. The mainstay of treatment remains early diagnosis with early establishment of drainage and subsequent management of bladder dysfunction with behavioral therapy, medication, clean intermittent catheterization, and occasionally with bladder augmentation. Other measures such as nephrectomy can be implemented to manage polyuria. Ultimately, 30 % of patients born with PUV develop end-stage renal disease and require renal transplantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Krishnan A, de Souza A, Konijeti R, Baskin LS. The anatomy and embryology of posterior urethral valves. J Urol. 2006;175:1214–20. Excellent explanation of anatomy and embryology of posterior urethral valves.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clayton DB, Brock JW. In utero intervention for urologic diseases. Nat Rev Urol. 2012;9:207–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morris RK, Malin GL, Khan KS, Kilby MD. Systematic review of the effectiveness of antenatal intervention for the treatment of congenital lower urinary tract obstruction. BJOG. 2010;117:382–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morris RK, Kilby MD. 18: the PLUTO trial: percutaneous shunting in lower urinary tract obstruction. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:S14.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenfeld B, Greenfiled SP, Springate JE, FEld LG. Type III posterior urethral valves: presentation and management. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29:81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ditchfield MR, Grattan-Smith JD, de Campo JF, Hutson JM. Voiding cystourethrography in boys: does the presence of the catheter obscure the diagnosis of posterior urethral valves? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164(5):1233–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaumoitre K, Merrot T, Petit P, Sayegh-Martin Y, Alessandrini P, Panuel M. Voiding cystourethrography in boys. Does the presence of the catheter during voiding alter the evaluation of the urethra? J Urol. 2004;171(3):1280–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harvie S, McLeod L, Acott P, Walsh E, Abdolell M, Macken MB. Abnormal antenatal sonogram: an indicator of disease severity in children with posterior urethral valves. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2009;60(4):185–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernardes LS, Akses G, Saada J, Masse V, Elie C, Dumez Y, et al. Keyhole sign: how specific is it for the diagnosis of posterior urethral valves? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(4):419–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harrison MR, Nakayama DK, Noall RA, de Lorimier A. Correction of congenital hydronephrosis in utero II. Decompression reverses the effects of obstruction on the fetal lung and urinary tract. J Pediatr Surg. 1982;17:965–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Quintero R, Shukla A, Homsy Y, Bukkapatnam R. Successful in utero endoscopic ablation of posterior urethral valves: a new dimension in fetal urology. Urology. 2000;55(5):774. Case report detailed successful fetal ablation of posterior urethral valves.

  12. Sananes N, Favre R, Koh CJ, Zaloszyc A, Braun MC, Roth DR, Moog R, Becmeur F, Belfort MA, Ruano R. Urological fistulas after cystoscopic laser ablation of posterior urethral valves–surgical technical aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(2):183–9.

  13. Morris RK, Quinlan-Jones E, Kilby MD, Khan KS. Systematic review of accuracy of fetal urine analysis to predict poor postnatal renal function in cases of congenital urinary tract obstruction. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27(10):900–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernardes LS, Aksnes G, Saada J, Masse V, Elie C, Dumez Y, et al. Keyhole sign: how specific is it for the diagnosis of posterior urethral valves? J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(7):1412–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Klein J, Lacroix C, Caubet C, Siwy J, Zurbig P, Dakna M, et al. Fetal urinary peptides to predict postnatal outcome of renal disease in fetuses with posterior urethral valves. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:198ra106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Morris R. Percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting versus conservative management for fetal lower urinary tract obstruction (PLUTO): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2013;382:1496–506. This randomized controlled trial evaluated vesicoamniotic shunting and conservative management in order to assess the efficacy and safety of prenatal intervention in fetuses with evidence of lower urinary tract obstruction. It is the only randomized control trial to try to answer this question.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Glassberg KI. The valve bladder syndrome: 20 years later. J Urol. 2001;166:1406–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarin Y, Sinha S. Efficacy of bladder neck incision on urodynamic abnormalities in patients with posterior urethral valves. Pediatr Surg Int. 2013;29:387–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mokhless I, Zahran A, Saad A, Yehira M, Youssif M. Effect of botox injection at the bladder neck in boys with bladder dysfunction after valve ablation. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10:899–905.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gupta RK, Shah HS, Jadhav V et al. Urethral ratio on voiding cystourethrogram: a comparative method to assess success of posterior urethral valve ablation. J Pediatr Urol. 2010;6(1):32–6.

  21. Pohl M, Mentzel HJ, Vogt S, Walther M, Ronnefarth G, John U. Risk factors for renal insufficiency in children with urethral valves. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012;27(3):443–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ansari MS, Gulia A, Srivastava A, Kapoor R. Risk factors for progression to end stage renal disease in children with posterior urethral valves. J Pediatr Urol. 2010;6(3):261–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sarhan O, El-Dahshan K, Sarhan M. Prognostic value of serum creatinine levels in children with posterior urethral valves treated by primary valve ablation. J Pediatr Urol. 2010;6(1):11–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghanem MA, Wolffenbuttel KP, De Vylder A, Nijman RJ. Long-term bladder dysfunction and renal function in boys with posterior urethral valves based on urodynamic findings. J Urol. 2004;171:2409–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peters CA, Bolkier M, Bauer SB, Hendren WH, Colodny AH, Mandell J, et al. The urodynamic consequences of posterior urethral valves. J Urol. 1990;144:122–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sarhan O, Zaccaria I, Macher MA, Muller F, Vuillard E, Delezoide AL, et al. Long term outcome of prenatally detected posterior urethral valves: single center study of 65 cases managed by primary valve ablation. J Urol. 2008;179(1):307–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ghane S, Bitzan M, Szymanski K, Bell LE, Gupta I, Tchervenkov J, et al. Native nephrectomy prior to pediatric kidney transplantation: biological and clinical aspects. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012;27(7):1179–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Otukesh H, Basiri A, Simfroosh N, et al. Kidney transplantation in children with posterior urethral valves. Pediatr Transplant. 2008;12(5):516–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Irina Stanasel and Edmond Gonzales declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Stanasel.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Pediatric Bladder Dysfunction

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stanasel, I., Gonzales, E. Posterior Urethral Valves. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep 10, 250–255 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-015-0309-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-015-0309-4

Keywords

Navigation