Skip to main content
Log in

Functional Improvements Utilizing the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) in the Elderly after Epidural Steroid Injections

  • Other Pain (A. Kaye and N. Vadivelu, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Pain and Headache Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The treatment of debilitating pain and loss of function secondary to lumbar stenosis is in high demand with the aging patient population. Options, including epidural steroid injections (ESIs) and medication therapy, are limited and it is unclear if they provide any functional improvements. In this prospective study, we evaluate functional outcomes in older adults with symptomatic lumbar stenosis treated with ESIs compared to those managed with medications by introducing the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Our study was IRB-approved and included 16 patients, 68 to 83 years old, with symptomatic back and radicular leg pain secondary to lumbar stenosis. Patients could elect to undergo a lumbar ESI (n = 11) or be treated via medication management (n = 5). Numeric pain score, SPPB score, and adverse events were measured and compared at baseline and a 1-month follow-up visit.

Recent Findings

Statistically significant improvements were observed from baseline compared to the 1-month follow-up for total SPPB score in the injection group. Similar improvements in the injection group were observed for pain scores and the SPPB subcomponents such as the 4-m walk test, chair stand time, and balance score. Comparatively, no statistically significant improvements were observed in the medication group.

Summary

Lumbar ESIs improved objective physical capacity parameters and pain scores in elderly patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis compared to medication management. In addition, the SPPB is an easy-to-use tool to measure changes in physical function in older adults and could easily be integrated into an outpatient pain clinic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, Li L, Suri P, Guermazi A, et al. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: The Framingham Study. Spine J. 2009;9:545–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kovacs FM, Urrútia G, Alarcón JD. Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Spine. 2011;36:E1335–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Issack PS, Cunningham ME, Pumberger M, Hughes AP, Cammisa FP. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20:527–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Borenstein D. Mechanical low back pain: a rheumatologist’s view. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013;9:643–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kreiner SD, Shaffer WO, Baisden JL, Gilbert TJ, Summers JT, Toton JF, et al. North American Spine Society. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update). Spine J. 2013;13:734–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kobayashi S. Pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of intermittent claudication in patients with lumbar canal stenosis. World J Orthop. 2014;5:134–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:794–810.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Costandi S, Chopko B, Mekhail M, Dews T, Mekhail N. Lumbar spinal stenosis: therapeutic options review. Pain Pract. 2015;15:68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen SP, Bicket MC, Jamison D, Wilkinson I, Rathmell JP. Epidural steroids: a comprehensive, evidence-based review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:175–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Amundsen T, Weber H, Lilleas F. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Conservative or surgical management: a 10-year prospective trial. Spine. 2000;25:1424–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chad MD, David A. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Neurol Clin. 2007;25:407–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Manchikanti L, Kaye AD, Manchikanti K, Boswell M, Pampati V, Hirsch J. Efficacy of epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar central canal spinal stenosis: a systematic review. Anesth Pain Med. 2015;5:e23139.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen SP, Hanling S, Bicket MC, White RL, Veizi E, Kurihara C, et al. Epidural steroid injections compared with gabapentin for lumbosacral radicular pain: multicenter randomized double-blind comparative efficacy study. BMJ. 2015;350:h1748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Delport EG, Cucuzzella AR, Marley JK, Pruitt CM, Fisher JR. Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with epidural steroid injections: a retrospective outcome study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:479–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Friedly JL, Comstock BA, Turner JA, Heagerty PJ, Deyo RA, Sullivan SD, et al. A randomized trial of epidural glucocorticoid injections for spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ammendolia C, Stuber K, Tomkins-Lane CC. What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:1282–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994;49:M85–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tomkins-Lane CC, Haig AJ. A review of activity monitors as a new technology for objectifying function in lumbar spinal stenosis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2012;25:177–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Arnau A, Espaulella J, Méndez T, Serrarols M, Canudas J, Formiga F, et al. Lower limb function and 10-year survival in population aged 75 years and older. Fam Pract. 2016;33:10–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fisher S, Ottenbacher KJ, Goodwin JS, Graham JE, Ostir GV. Short Physical Performance Battery in hospitalized older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2009;21:445–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Corsonello A, Lattanzio F, Pedone C, Garasto S, Laino I, Bustacchini S, et al. Pharmacosurveillance In The Elderly Care Pvc Study Investigators. Prognostic significance of the short physical performance battery in older patients discharged from acute care hospitals. Rejuvenation Res. 2012;15:41–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:556–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pamoukdjian F, Paillaud E, Zelek L, Laurent M, Lévy V, Landre T, et al. Measurement of gait speed in older adults to identify complications associated with frailty: a systematic review. J Geriatr Oncol. 2015;6:484–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cosgrove JL, Bertolet M, Chase SL, Cosgrove GK. Epidural steroid injections in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: efficacy and predictability of successful response. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;90:1050–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tomkins-Lane CC, Conway J, Hepler C, Haig AJ. Changes in objectively measured physical activity (performance) after epidural steroid injection for lumbar spinal stenosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:2008–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors wish to disclose and thank the sponsor of the study. The study was conducted by Dr. Rene Przkora and was sponsored by the National Institutes of Health-funded University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) Clinical and Translational Science Award (grant no. UL1TR001439) and by the UTMB Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (grant no. P30 AG024832 to E.V.) Research Career Development Project (project no. RCD4 to R.P.). The sponsorship was limited to supplies and expenses. It had no influence or interference after the protocol was designed.

The financial sponsor of this work had no role in the design and conduct of the study or the collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data. The sponsor also did not have a role in the preparation or review of the manuscript or the decision to submit.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rene Przkora.

Ethics declarations

The present investigation was a prospective, Institutional Review Board-approved, observational study in adults > 65 years old. Informed written consent was obtained for every patient.

Conflict of Interest

Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no commercial association (i.e., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted manuscript. Rene Przkora, Michael P. Kinsky, Steve R. Fisher, Christopher Babl, Christoph E. Heyde, Terrie Vasilopoulos, Alan D. Kaye, and Elena Volpi declare no conflict of interest. Alan Kaye is on the speaker bureau for Merck and Depomed, Inc.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Other Pain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Przkora, R., Kinsky, M.P., Fisher, S.R. et al. Functional Improvements Utilizing the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) in the Elderly after Epidural Steroid Injections. Curr Pain Headache Rep 23, 14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-019-0748-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-019-0748-2

Keywords

Navigation