Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethical Considerations for a Better Collaboration Between Architects and Structural Engineers: Design of Buildings with Reinforced Concrete Frame Systems in Earthquake Zones

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Architects design building structures, although structural design is the profession of structural engineers. Thus, it is better for architects and structural engineers to collaborate starting from the initial phases of the architectural design. However, this is not very common because of the contradictory design processes and value systems held within the two professions. This article provides a platform upon which architects and structural engineers can resolve the value conflicts between them by analysing phases of the structural design of reinforced concrete frame systems in architecture, the criteria of the structural design for each phase and determining the conflicting values for each criterion. The results shown in the article demonstrate that the architectural design of structures is a complex process, which is based on contradictory values and value systems. Finally, the article suggests to architects and structural engineers to use Value Sensitive Design and to choose an appropriate team leader in order to resolve the unethical conflict between them and to avoid any unreasonable decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABET (Accreditaion Board for Engineering and Technology). (2013). Accreditation criteria available online: http://www.abet.org/accreditation-criteria-policies-documents/. Accessed April 2013.

  • Ambrose, J., & Vergun, D. (1999). Design for earthquakes. Canada: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ando, T. (1997). Tadao Ando’s royal gold medal address. Concrete Quarterly. Autumn, 2–7.

  • Arnold, C. (1984). Building configuration: The architecture of seismic design. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 17(2), 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, C., & Reitherman, R. (1982). Building configuration and seismic design—the architecture of earthquake resistance. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanassiadou, C. J. (2008). Seismic performance of R/C plane frames irregular in elevation. Engineering Structures, 30(5), 1250–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billington, D. P. (1983). The tower and bridge. NY: Basic Book Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botticher, K. (1852). The tectonics of the Hellenes. Postdam: Verlag von Ernst & Korn.

  • Bucciarelli, L. L. (2000). Delta design: Seeing/seeing As. In Proceedings of the 4th design thinking research symposium on design representation, MIT, April 1999.

  • Charleson, A. W., & Pirie, S. (2009). An investigation of structural engineer—architect collaboration. SESOC Journal (New Zealand), 22(1), 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charleson, A., Preston, J., & Taylor, M. (2001). Architectural expression of seismic strengthening. Earthquake Spectra, 17(3), 417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charleson, A., & Taylor, M. (2004) Earthquake architecture explorations. In Proceedings of 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. Vancouver, Canada, August 1–6, 2004. Paper no: 596.

  • Ching, F. D. K. (2011). Building construction illustrated. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorn, N. (2012). Exploring responsibility rationales in research and development. science technology human values (Vol. 37, p. 180). http://sth.sagepub.com/content/37/3/180. Accessed April 2013.

  • Frampton, K. (2001). Studies in tectonic culture: The poetics of construction in nineteenth and twentieth century architecture. In: J. Cava (Ed.) Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  • Frassen, M. (2005). Arrow’s theorem, multi-criteria decision problems and multi-attribute preferences in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design, 16, 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B., Kahn, P., & Borning, A. (2006). Value sensitive design and information systems. In P. Zhang & D. Galletta (Eds.), Human computer interaction in management information systems (pp. 1–27). NY: M.E. Sharpe Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregotti, V. (1996). The exercise of detailing. In K. Nesbitt (Ed.), Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: An anthology of architecture theory, 1965–1995 (pp. 494–497). NY: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habraken, J. (1998). The structure of the ordinary—form and control in the built environment. In J. Teicher (Ed.) Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  • Hartoonian, G. (1994). Ontology of construction. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holgate, A. (1986). The art in structural design. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, H. S. (1966). Structure: An architects approach. NY: Mc Graw Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hürol, Y., & Wilkinson, N. (2005). A critique of earthquake policies of Northern Cyprus. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineering-Structure and Buildings, 158(6), 355–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushik, H. B., Rai, D. C., & Jain, S. K. (2009). Effectiveness of some strengthening options for masonry infilled RC frames with open first storey. Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, 135(8), 925–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirac, N., Dogan, M., & Ozbasaran, H. (2011). Failure of weak storeys during earthquakes. Engineering Failure Analysis, 18(2), 572–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Dantec, C.A., Poole, E. S., & Wyche, S. P. (2009). Values as lived experience: Evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM.

  • Lee, H. S., & Woo, S. W. (2002). Effect of masonry ınfills on seismic performance of a 3 storey R/C frame with non-seismic detailing. Earthquake Engineering Structures, 31(2), 353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T. Y., & Stotesbury, S. D. (1981). Structural concepts and systems for architects and engineers. NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, A. J. (2001). Structure and architecture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainstone, R. (1975). Developments in structural form. Massachusets: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1987). Motivation and personality (3rd ed.). NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Public Works and Settlement Government of the Republic of Turkey. (2007). Seismic performance evaluation of dual reinforced concrete systems design according to Turkish seismic code (E. Y. Karcı, Trans.). http://www.belgeler.com/blg/22lc/seismic-performance-evaluation-of-dual-reinforced-concrete-systems-design-according-to-turkish-seismic-code. Accessed April 2013.

  • NAAB (National Architectural Accrediting Board). (2013). Accreditation criteria availbale online: http://www.naab.org/accreditation/. Accessed April 2013.

  • Nervi, P. L. (1965). Aesthetics and technology in building. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paz, M. (1994). International handbook of earthquake engineering. NY: Chapman & Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poerschke, V., Holland, R. J., Messner, J. I., & Pihlak, M. (2009). BIM collaboration across six disciplines. In W. Tizami (Ed.), Proceedings of the international conference on computing in civil and building engineering. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.

  • Popovic, L. O., & Tyas, A. (2004). Conceptual structural design: Bridging the gap between architects and engineers. Springfield, IL: Thomas Telford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pultar, M. (1997). A conceptual framework for values in the built environment. In M. Grey (Ed.), Evolving environmental ideals: Changing ways of life, values and design practices (pp. 261–267). Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pultar, M. (2000). The conceptual basis of building ethics. In W. Fox (Ed.), Ethics of the built environment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvadori, M., & Levy, M. (1981). Structural design in architecture. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, D. (2004). Liberating voices—a pattern language for communication revolution (pp. 366–369). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekler, E. F. (1965). Structure, construction, tectonics. In G. Kepes (Ed.), Structure in art and in science (pp. 89–95). NY: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semper, G. (1951). The four elements of architecture and other writings. NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, J. R., & Chivini, M. (2007). Structural design: A practical guide for architects. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitruvius, P. (1960). The ten books on architecture (M. H. Morgan, Trans.). New York: Courier Dover Publications.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean University, Room: 118, Magusa, Kıbrıs, Via Mersin 10, Famagusta, Turkey

    Yonca Hurol

Authors
  1. Yonca Hurol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yonca Hurol.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hurol, Y. Ethical Considerations for a Better Collaboration Between Architects and Structural Engineers: Design of Buildings with Reinforced Concrete Frame Systems in Earthquake Zones. Sci Eng Ethics 20, 597–612 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9453-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9453-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation