Abstract
In eukaryotes, reversible shuttling between the nucleus and cytoplasm is an important regulatory mechanism, particularly for many kinases and transcription factors. Inspired by the natural system, we recently developed a technology to control protein position in budding yeast using a chemical inducer of dimerization (CID). In this method, a nuclear export or localization signal is reversibly appended to a protein of interest by the CID, which effectively places its subcellular location under direct control of the chemical stimulus. Here, we explicitly tested the ability of this system to direct the nucleocytoplasmic transport of a panel of 16 representative kinases and transcription factors. From this set, we found that 12 targets (75%) are susceptible to re-positioning, suggesting that this method might be applicable to a range of targets. Interestingly, the four proteins that resisted mislocalization (Fun20p, Hcm1p, Pho4p, and Ste12p) are known to engage in a large number of protein–protein contacts. We suspect that, for these highly connected targets, the strength of the chemical signal may be insufficient to drive mislocalization and that proteins with relatively few partners might be most amenable to this approach. Collectively, these studies provide a necessary framework for the design of large-scale applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nigg, E. A. (1997). Nucleocytoplasmic transport: Signals, mechanisms and regulation. Nature, 386, 779–787.
Weis, K. (2003). Regulating access to the genome: Nucleocytoplasmic transport throughout the cell cycle. Cell, 112, 441–451.
Crabtree, G. R., & Olson, E. N. (2002). NFAT signaling: Choreographing the social lives of cells. Cell, 109(Suppl), S67–S79.
Geda, P., Patury, S., Ma, J., Bharucha, N., Dobry, C. J., Lawson, S. K., et al. (2008). A small molecule-directed approach to control protein localization and function. Yeast, 25, 577–594.
Klemm, J. D., Beals, C. R., & Crabtree, G. R. (1997). Rapid targeting of nuclear proteins to the cytoplasm. Current Biology, 7, 638–644.
Bayle, J. H., Grimley, J. S., Stankunas, K., Gestwicki, J. E., Wandless, T. J., & Crabtree, G. R. (2006). Rapamycin analogs with differential binding specificity permit orthogonal control of protein activity. Chemistry & Biology, 13, 99–107.
Briesewitz, R., Ray, G. T., Wandless, T. J., & Crabtree, G. R. (1999). Affinity modulation of small-molecule ligands by borrowing endogenous protein surfaces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 1953–1958.
Crabtree, G. R., & Schreiber, S. L. (1996). Three-part inventions: Intracellular signaling and induced proximity. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 21, 418–422.
Gestwicki, J. E., & Marinec, P. S. (2007). Chemical control over protein–protein interactions: Beyond inhibitors. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening, 10, 667–675.
Banaszynski, L. A., & Wandless, T. J. (2006). Conditional control of protein function. Chemistry & Biology, 13, 11–21.
Harding, M. W., Galat, A., Uehling, D. E., & Schreiber, S. L. (1989). A receptor for the immunosuppressant FK506 is a cis-trans peptidyl-prolyl isomerase. Nature, 341, 758–760.
Siekierka, J. J., Hung, S. H., Poe, M., Lin, C. S., & Sigal, N. H. (1989). A cytosolic binding protein for the immunosuppressant FK506 has peptidyl-prolyl isomerase activity but is distinct from cyclophilin. Nature, 341, 755–757.
Brown, E. J., Albers, M. W., Shin, T. B., Ichikawa, K., Keith, C. T., Lane, W. S., et al. (1994). A mammalian protein targeted by G1-arresting rapamycin-receptor complex. Nature, 369, 756–758.
Banaszynski, L. A., Liu, C. W., & Wandless, T. J. (2005). Characterization of the FKBP.rapamycin.FRB ternary complex. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 127, 4715–4721.
Walhout, A. J., Sordella, R., Lu, X., Hartley, J. L., Temple, G. F., Brasch, M. A., et al. (2000). Protein interaction mapping in C. elegans using proteins involved in vulval development. Science, 287, 116–122.
Nagai, T., Ibata, K., Park, E. S., Kubota, M., Mikoshiba, K., & Miyawaki, A. (2002). A variant of yellow fluorescent protein with fast and efficient maturation for cell-biological applications. Nature Biotechnology, 20, 87–90.
Goldstein, A. L., & McCusker, J. H. (1999). Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast, 15, 1541–1553.
Graumann, J., Dunipace, L. A., Seol, J. H., McDonald, W. H., Yates, J. R., I. I. I., Wold, B. J., et al. (2004). Applicability of tandem affinity purification MudPIT to pathway proteomics in yeast. Molecular & Cell Proteomics, 3, 226–237.
Gavin, A. C., Bosche, M., Krause, R., Grandi, P., Marzioch, M., Bauer, A., et al. (2002). Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature, 415, 141–147.
Ho, Y., Gruhler, A., Heilbut, A., Bader, G. D., Moore, L., Adams, S. L., et al. (2002). Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature, 415, 180–183.
Fields, S. (2005). High-throughput two-hybrid analysis. The promise and the peril. FEBS Journal, 272, 5391–5399.
Bharucha, N., Ma, J., Dobry, C. J., Lawson, S. K., Yang, Z., & Kumar, A. (2008). Analysis of the yeast kinome reveals a network of regulated protein localization during filamentous growth. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 19, 2708–2717.
Wiwatwattana, N., Landau, C. M., Cope, G. J., Harp, G. A., & Kumar, A. (2007). Organelle DB: An updated resource of eukaryotic protein localization and function. Nucleic Acids Research, 35, D810–D814.
Butty, A. C., Pryciak, P. M., Huang, L. S., Herskowitz, I., & Peter, M. (1998). The role of Far1p in linking the heterotrimeric G protein to polarity establishment proteins during yeast mating. Science, 282, 1511–1516.
Fields, S., & Song, O. (1989). A novel genetic system to detect protein–protein interactions. Nature, 340, 245–246.
Grigoriev, A. (2003). On the number of protein–protein interactions in the yeast proteome. Nucleic Acids Research, 31, 4157–4161.
Kohler, J. J., & Bertozzi, C. R. (2003). Regulating cell surface glycosylation by small molecule control of enzyme localization. Chemistry & Biology, 10, 1303–1311.
Graef, I. A., Holsinger, L. J., Diver, S., Schreiber, S. L., & Crabtree, G. R. (1997). Proximity and orientation underlie signaling by the non-receptor tyrosine kinase ZAP70. EMBO Journal, 16, 5618–5628.
Haruki, H., Nishikawa, J., & Laemmli, U. K. (2008). The anchor-away technique: Rapid, conditional establishment of yeast mutant phenotypes. Molecular Cell, 31, 925–932.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank C. Trevor, R. Lahey, and T. Cory for helpful comments and eager assistance. This work was supported by grants RSG-06-179-01-MBC from the American Cancer Society, DBI 0543017 from the National Science Foundation, and Basil O’Connor Award 5-FY05-1224 from the March of Dimes (to A.K.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patury, S., Geda, P., Dobry, C.J. et al. Conditional Nuclear Import and Export of Yeast Proteins Using a Chemical Inducer of Dimerization. Cell Biochem Biophys 53, 127–134 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-009-9044-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-009-9044-9