Skip to main content
Log in

Growth hormone tumor histological subtypes predict response to surgical and medical therapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Growth hormone (GH) pituitary tumors are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Current treatments, including surgery and medical therapy with somatostatin analogs (SSA), dopamine agonists and/or a GH receptor antagonist, result in disease remission in approximately half of patients. Predictors of GH tumor response to different therapies have been incompletely defined based on histologic subtype, particularly densely (DG) versus sparsely (SG) granulated adenomas. The aim of this study was to examine our own institutional experience with GH adenomas and correlate how subtype related to clinical parameters as well as response to surgery and medical therapies. A retrospective chart review of 101 acromegalic patients operated by a single neurosurgeon was performed. Clinical data were correlated with histologic subtype and disease control, as defined by IGF-1 levels, and random growth hormone levels in response to surgery and/or medical therapies. SG tumors, compared to DG, occurred in younger patients (p = 0.0010), were 3-fold larger (p = 0.0030) but showed no differences in tumor-invasion characteristics (p = 0.12). DG tumors had a higher rate of remission in response to surgery compared to SG, 65.7 vs. 14.3 % (p < 0.0001), as well as to medical therapy with SSAs (68.8 % for DG vs. 28.6 % for SG tumors; p = 0.028). SG tumors not controlled with SSAs consistently responded to a switch to, or addition of, a GH receptor antagonist. Histological GH tumor subtyping implicates a different clinical phenotype and biologic behavior, and provides prognostic significance for surgical success and response to medical therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.L. Asa, S. Ezzat, The pathogenesis of pituitary tumors. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 4, 97–126 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Melmed, Acromegaly pathogenesis and treatment. J. Clin. Invest. 119(11), 3189–3202 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Melmed, A. Colao, A. Barkan, M. Molitch, A.B. Grossman, D. Kleinberg, D. Clemmons, P. Chanson, E. Laws, J. Schlechte, M.L. Vance, K. Ho, A. Giustina, Guidelines for acromegaly management: an update. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 94(5), 1509–1517 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. D.R. Clemmons, K. Chihara, P.U. Freda, K.K. Ho, A. Klibanski, S. Melmed, S.M. Shalet, C.J. Strasburger, P.J. Trainer, M.O. Thorner, Optimizing control of acromegaly: integrating a growth hormone receptor antagonist into the treatment algorithm. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 88(10), 4759–4767 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. I. Shimon, Z.R. Cohen, Z. Ram, M. Hadani, Transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: endocrinological follow-up of 98 patients. Neurosurgery 48(6), 1239–1243 (2001). discussion 1244–1235

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. I. Donangelo, S. Melmed, Treatment of acromegaly: future. Endocrine 28(1), 123–128 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. P.U. Freda, Somatostatin analogs in acromegaly. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 87(7), 3013–3018 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Mercado, F. Borges, H. Bouterfa, T.C. Chang, A. Chervin, A.J. Farrall, A. Patocs, S. Petersenn, J. Podoba, M. Safari, J. Wardlaw, A prospective, multicentre study to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of octreotide LAR (long-acting repeatable octreotide) in the primary therapy of patients with acromegaly. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf) 66(6), 859–868 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Melmed, D. Cook, J. Schopohl, M.I. Goth, K.S. Lam, J. Marek, Rapid and sustained reduction of serum growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 in patients with acromegaly receiving lanreotide Autogel therapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study with a 52 week open extension. Pituitary 13(1), 18–28 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Buchfelder, S. Schlaffer, M. Droste, K. Mann, B. Saller, K. Brubach, G.K. Stalla, C.J. Strasburger, The German ACROSTUDY: past and present. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 161(Suppl 1), S3–S10 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. A.J. van der Lely, B.M. Biller, T. Brue, M. Buchfelder, E. Ghigo, R. Gomez, J. Hey-Hadavi, F. Lundgren, N. Rajicic, C.J. Strasburger, S.M. Webb, M. Koltowska-Haggstrom, Long-term safety of pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly: comprehensive review of 1288 subjects in ACROSTUDY. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 97(5), 1589–1597 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Sandret, P. Maison, P. Chanson, Place of cabergoline in acromegaly: a meta-analysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 96(5), 1327–1335 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Marazuela, A. Ramos-Levi, M. Sampedro-Nunez, I. Bernabeu, Cabergoline treatment in acromegaly: pros. Endocrine 46(2), 215–219 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Kasuki, L. Vieira Neto, M.R. Gadelha, Cabergoline treatment in acromegaly: cons. Endocrine 46(2), 220–225 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. P. Nomikos, M. Buchfelder, R. Fahlbusch, The outcome of surgery in 668 patients with acromegaly using current criteria of biochemical ‘cure’. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 152(3), 379–387 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Kovacs, E. Horvath, B. Corenblum, A.M. Sirek, G. Penz, C. Ezrin, Pituitary chromophobe adenomas consisting of prolactin cells: a histologic, immunocytological and electron microscopic study. Virchows Arch. A Pathol. Anat. Histol. 366(2), 113–123 (1975)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Horvath, K. Kovacs, Ultrastructural classification of pituitary adenomas. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 3(1), 9–21 (1976)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Yamada, T. Aiba, T. Sano, K. Kovacs, Y. Shishiba, S. Sawano, K. Takada, Growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: correlations between clinical characteristics and morphology. Neurosurgery 33(1), 20–27 (1993)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. T. Sano, T. Ohshima, S. Yamada, Expression of glycoprotein hormones and intracytoplasmic distribution of cytokeratin in growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas. Pathol. Res. Pract. 187(5), 530–533 (1991)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Obari, T. Sano, K. Ohyama, E. Kudo, Z.R. Qian, A. Yoneda, N. Rayhan, M. Mustafizur Rahman, S. Yamada, Clinicopathological features of growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: difference among various types defined by cytokeratin distribution pattern including a transitional form. Endocr. Pathol. 19(2), 82–91 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. P.E. Neumann, J.E. Goldman, D.S. Horoupian, M.A. Hess, Fibrous bodies in growth hormone-secreting adenomas contain cytokeratin filaments. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 109(6), 505–508 (1985)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. K. Kiseljak-Vassiliades, S. Shafi, J.M. Kerr, T.L. Phang, B.K. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, M.E. Wierman, Clinical implications of growth hormone-secreting tumor subtypes. Endocrine 42(1), 18–28 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. V. Karantza, Keratins in health and cancer: more than mere epithelial cell markers. Oncogene 30(2), 127–138 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. G.M. Besser, P. Burman, A.F. Daly, Predictors and rates of treatment-resistant tumor growth in acromegaly. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 153(2), 187–193 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Bhayana, G.L. Booth, S.L. Asa, K. Kovacs, S. Ezzat, The implication of somatotroph adenoma phenotype to somatostatin analog responsiveness in acromegaly. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 90(11), 6290–6295 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Ezzat, G. Kontogeorgos, D.A. Redelmeier, E. Horvath, A.G. Harris, K. Kovacs, In vivo responsiveness of morphological variants of growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas to octreotide. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 133(6), 686–690 (1995)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. H. Bando, T. Sano, T. Ohshima, C.Y. Zhang, R. Yamasaki, K. Matsumoto, S. Saito, Differences in pathological findings and growth hormone responses in patients with growth hormone-producing pituitary adenoma. Endocrinol. Jpn. 39(4), 355–363 (1992)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. P.R. Mazal, T. Czech, R. Sedivy, M. Aichholzer, J. Wanschitz, N. Klupp, H. Budka, Prognostic relevance of intracytoplasmic cytokeratin pattern, hormone expression profile, and cell proliferation in pituitary adenomas of akromegalic patients. Clin. Neuropathol. 20(4), 163–171 (2001)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. J. Brzana, C.G. Yedinak, S.H. Gultekin, J.B. Delashaw, M. Fleseriu, Growth hormone granulation pattern and somatostatin receptor subtype 2A correlate with postoperative somatostatin receptor ligand response in acromegaly: a large single center experience. Pituitary 16(4), 490–498 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Y. Bakhtiar, H. Hirano, K. Arita, S. Yunoue, S. Fujio, A. Tominaga, T. Sakoguchi, K. Sugiyama, K. Kurisu, J. Yasufuku-Takano, K. Takano, Relationship between cytokeratin staining patterns and clinico-pathological features in somatotropinomae. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 163(4), 531–539 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. S.L. Fougner, O. Casar-Borota, A. Heck, J.P. Berg, J. Bollerslev, Adenoma granulation pattern correlates with clinical variables and effect of somatostatin analogue treatment in a large series of patients with acromegaly. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf) 76(1), 96–102 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. S. Larkin, R. Reddy, N. Karavitaki, S. Cudlip, J. Wass, O. Ansorge, Granulation pattern, but not GSP or GHR mutation, is associated with clinical characteristics in somatostatin-naive patients with somatotroph adenomas. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 168(4), 491–499 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. S. Melmed, F.F. Casanueva, A. Klibanski, M.D. Bronstein, P. Chanson, S.W. Lamberts, C.J. Strasburger, J.A. Wass, A. Giustina, A consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly complications. Pituitary 16(3), 294–302 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. P. Lundin, F. Pedersen, Volume of pituitary macroadenomas: assessment by MRI. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 16(4), 519–528 (1992)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. J.D. Carmichael, V.S. Bonert, J.M. Mirocha, S. Melmed, The utility of oral glucose tolerance testing for diagnosis and assessment of treatment outcomes in 166 patients with acromegaly. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 94(2), 523–527 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. B.M. Mayr, R. Buslei, M. Theodoropoulou, G.K. Stalla, M. Buchfelder, C. Schoefl, Molecular and functional properties of densely and sparsely granulated GH-producing pituitary adenomas. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 169(4), 391–400 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. R. Mori, N. Inoshita, J. Takahashi-Fujigasaki, T. Joki, H. Nishioka, T. Abe, T. Fujii, S. Yamada, Clinicopathological features of growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas in 242 acromegaly patients: classification according to hormone production and cytokeratin distribution. ISRN Endocrinol. 2013, 723432 (2013)

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. M. Kato, N. Inoshita, T. Sugiyama, Y. Tani, M. Shichiri, T. Sano, S. Yamada, Y. Hirata, Differential expression of genes related to drug responsiveness between sparsely and densely granulated somatotroph adenomas. Endocr. J. 59(3), 221–228 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. T. Lekva, J.P. Berg, S.L. Fougner, O.K. Olstad, T. Ueland, J. Bollerslev, Gene expression profiling identifies ESRP1 as a potential regulator of epithelial mesenchymal transition in somatotroph adenomas from a large cohort of patients with acromegaly. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 97(8), E1506–E1514 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. L. Kasuki, L. VieiraNeto, L.E. Wildemberg, L.M. Colli, M. de Castro, C.M. Takiya, M.R. Gadelha, AIP expression in sporadic somatotropinomas is a predictor of the response to octreotide LAR therapy independent of SSTR2 expression. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 19(3), L25–L29 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. V. Nose, S. Ezzat, E. Horvath, K. Kovacs, E.R. Laws, R. Lloyd, M.B. Lopes, S.L. Asa, Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary pituitary tumors. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 135(5), 640–646 (2011)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thanks Molly Levitt for help in constructing initial patient database and participation in data collection. This work was supported by Investigator Initiated Grant from Pfizer, Inc and VA Merit Review to MEW, and NIH K12CA086913-12 to KKV.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kiseljak-Vassiliades, K., Carlson, N.E., Borges, M.T. et al. Growth hormone tumor histological subtypes predict response to surgical and medical therapy. Endocrine 49, 231–241 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0383-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0383-y

Keywords

Navigation