Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Heterogeneous clinical spectrum of anti-SRP myositis and importance of the methods of detection of anti-SRP autoantibodies: a multicentric study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Immunologic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) antibodies are important serological markers for the diagnosis and the prognosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), especially to distinguish immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM). This study was set up to investigate the phenotype associated with anti-SRP antibodies and to evaluate the methods for detecting these antibodies. Clinical and biological data were retrospectively obtained from 60 adult patients with anti-SRP antibodies detected by a dot immunoassay from 12 centers. Thirty-six (60 %) out of these 60 patients suffered from an IIM, and among them, 21 patients were diagnosed as IMNM. Among patients with a definite IIM, proximal weakness and myalgia were prominent symptoms at the time of diagnosis. Only few patients displayed severe extra-muscular symptoms such as cardiac involvement or severe myositis. Mean creatine kinase levels were high for all patients except for two of them. When testing by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on HEp2 cells, the fraction of patients displaying the typical anti-SRP fine speckled staining of the cytoplasm was higher in patients with IIM (30/36) (83 %) than in patients with non-IIM (3/24) (12.5 %) (p < 0.0001). Thirty (91 %) out of 33 patients with a positive immunodot and a characteristic IIF cytoplasmic staining suffered from a clinical definite myositis, whereas only 6 (22 %) out of 27 patients with a positive immunodot but a negative cytoplasmic pattern suffered from a myositis (p < 0.00001). This series highlights the strong heterogeneity of anti-SRP positivity that encompassed IMNM and non-IMNM and supports the necessity of considering both IIF and dot immunoassay to confirm the diagnosis of anti-SRP-associated myositis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoogendijk JE, Amato AA, Lecky BR, Choy EH, Lundberg IE, Rose MR, et al. 119th ENMC international workshop: trial design in adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, with the exception of inclusion body myositis, 10–12 October 2003, Naarden, The Netherlands. Neuromuscul Disord. 2004;14:337–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mammen AL. Necrotizing myopathies: beyond statins. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2014;26:679–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller T, Al-Lozi MT, Lopate G, Pestronk A. Myopathy with antibodies to the signal recognition particle: clinical and pathological features. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:420–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Basnayake SK, Blumbergs P, Tan JA, Roberts-Thompson PJ, Limaye V. Inflammatory myopathy with anti-SRP antibodies: case series of a South Australian cohort. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;34:603–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rider LG, Miller FW. Deciphering the clinical presentations, pathogenesis, and treatment of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. JAMA. 2011;305:183–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Petiot P, Choumert A, Hamelin L, Devic P, Streichenberger N. Necrotizing autoimmune myopathies. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2013;169:650–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fernandez C, Bardin N, De Paula AM, Salort-Campana E, Benyamine A, Franques J, et al. Correlation of clinicoserologic and pathologic classifications of inflammatory myopathies: study of 178 cases and guidelines for diagnosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2013;92:15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Valiyil R, Casciola-Rosen L, Hong G, Mammen A, Christopher-Stine L. Rituximab therapy for myopathy associated with anti-signal recognition particle antibodies: a case series. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62:1328–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Reeves WH, Nigam SK, Blobel G. Human autoantibodies reactive with the signal-recognition particle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:9507–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Christopher-Stine L, Casciola-Rosen LA, Hong G, Chung T, Corse AM, Mammen AL. A novel autoantibody recognizing 200-kd and 100-kd proteins is associated with an immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:2757–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Koenig M, Fritzler MJ, Targoff IN, Troyanov Y, Senecal JL. Heterogeneity of autoantibodies in 100 patients with autoimmune myositis: insights into clinical features and outcomes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9:R78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Benveniste O, Drouot L, Jouen F, Charuel JL, Bloch-Queyrat C, Behin A, et al. Correlation of anti-signal recognition particle autoantibody levels with creatine kinase activity in patients with necrotizing myopathy. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:1961–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lega JC, Fabien N, Reynaud Q, Durieu I, Durupt S, Dutertre M, et al. The clinical phenotype associated with myositis-specific and associated autoantibodies: A meta-analysis revisiting the so-called antisynthetase syndrome. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13:883–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hengstman GJ, ter Laak HJ, Vree Egberts WT, Lundberg IE, Moutsopoulos HM, Vencovsky J, et al. Anti-signal recognition particle autoantibodies: marker of a necrotising myopathy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:1635–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Griggs RC, Askanas V, DiMauro S, Engel A, Karpati G, Mendell JR, et al. Inclusion body myositis and myopathies. Ann Neurol. 1995;38:705–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Suzuki S, Nishikawa A, Kuwana M, Nishimura H, Watanabe Y, Nakahara J, et al. Inflammatory myopathy with anti-signal recognition particle antibodies: case series of 100 patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;10:61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dalakas MC. Inflammatory muscle diseases. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1734–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hengstman GJ, Brouwer R, Egberts WT, Seelig HP, Jongen PJ, van Venrooij WJ, et al. Clinical and serological characteristics of 125 Dutch myositis patients. Myositis specific autoantibodies aid in the differential diagnosis of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. J Neurol. 2002;249:69–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirakata M, Mimori T, Akizuki M, Craft J, Hardin JA, Homma M. Autoantibodies to small nuclear and cytoplasmic ribonucleoproteins in Japanese patients with inflammatory muscle disease. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:449–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brouwer R, Hengstman GJ, Vree Egberts W, Ehrfeld H, Bozic B, Ghirardello A, et al. Autoantibody profiles in the sera of European patients with myositis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;60:116–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Milisenda JC, Selva-O’Callaghan A, Grau JM. The diagnosis and classification of polymyositis. J Autoimmun. 2014;48–49:118–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ronnelid J, Barbasso Helmers S, Storfors H, Grip K, Ronnblom L, Franck-Larsson K, et al. Use of a commercial line blot assay as a screening test for autoantibodies in inflammatory myopathies. Autoimmun Rev. 2009;9:58–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. De Bleecker JL, De Paepe B, Aronica E, de Visser M, Amato A, Benveniste O, et al. 205th ENMC International Workshop: pathology diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies part II 28-30 March 2014, Naarden, The Netherlands. Neuromuscul Disord. 2015;25:268–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Targoff IN, Johnson AE, Miller FW. Antibody to signal recognition particle in polymyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33:1361–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Troyanov Y, Targoff IN, Tremblay JL, Goulet JR, Raymond Y, Senecal JL. Novel classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies based on overlap syndrome features and autoantibodies: analysis of 100 French Canadian patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2005;84:231–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kao AH, Lacomis D, Lucas M, Fertig N, Oddis CV. Anti-signal recognition particle autoantibody in patients with and patients without idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:209–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Aggarwal R, Oddis CV, Goudeau D, Fertig N, Metes I, Stephens C, et al. Anti-signal recognition particle autoantibody ELISA validation and clinical associations. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015;54:1194–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang L, Liu L, Hao H, Gao F, Liu X, Wang Z, et al. Myopathy with anti-signal recognition particle antibodies: clinical and histopathological features in Chinese patients. Neuromuscul Disord. 2014;24:335–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Love LA, Leff RL, Fraser DD, Targoff IN, Dalakas M, Plotz PH, et al. A new approach to the classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: myositis-specific autoantibodies define useful homogeneous patient groups. Medicine (Baltimore). 1991;70:360–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dimitri D, Andre C, Roucoules J, Hosseini H, Humbel RL, Authier FJ. Myopathy associated with anti-signal recognition peptide antibodies: clinical heterogeneity contrasts with stereotyped histopathology. Muscle Nerve. 2007;35:389–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Arbuckle MR, McClain MT, Rubertone MV, Scofield RH, Dennis GJ, James JA, et al. Development of autoantibodies before the clinical onset of systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1526–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kokkonen H, Mullazehi M, Berglin E, Hallmans G, Wadell G, Ronnelid J, et al. Antibodies of IgG, IgA and IgM isotypes against cyclic citrullinated peptide precede the development of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13:R13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the patients and the contributions made by the clinicians of all hospitals for the clinical data and especially: Pr JF Cordier JF, Pr. V. Cottin, Dr C. Khouatra, Dr J. Traclet, Pr J. Tebib, Pr J. Ninet, Dr G. Devouassoux, Dr B. Coppéré, Dr H. Gervais-Bernard, Dr E. Monard; Hospices Civils de Lyon; Dr C. Doche, CHG Chambéry, France; Pr J. Authier, neurology department, hôpital Henri Mondor, APHP, Créteil, France; Dr Steven Vanderschueren Catholic University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven; Belgique. We acknowledge Immunobiotec, CRB, HCL Lyon BB003300046.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Fabien.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Thierry Vincent and Jean-Christophe Lega have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Picard, C., Vincent, T., Lega, JC. et al. Heterogeneous clinical spectrum of anti-SRP myositis and importance of the methods of detection of anti-SRP autoantibodies: a multicentric study. Immunol Res 64, 677–686 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-015-8774-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-015-8774-6

Keywords

Navigation