Skip to main content
Log in

The efficacy of support vector machines (SVM) in robust determination of earthquake early warning magnitudes in central Japan

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This work deals with a methodology applied to seismic early warning systems which are designed to provide real-time estimation of the magnitude of an event. We will reappraise the work of Simons et al. (2006), who on the basis of wavelet approach predicted a magnitude error of ±1. We will verify and improve upon the methodology of Simons et al. (2006) by applying an SVM statistical learning machine on the time-scale wavelet decomposition methods. We used the data of 108 events in central Japan with magnitude ranging from 3 to 7.4 recorded at KiK-net network stations, for a source–receiver distance of up to 150 km during the period 1998–2011. We applied a wavelet transform on the seismogram data and calculating scale-dependent threshold wavelet coefficients. These coefficients were then classified into low magnitude and high magnitude events by constructing a maximum margin hyperplane between the two classes, which forms the essence of SVMs. Further, the classified events from both the classes were picked up and linear regressions were plotted to determine the relationship between wavelet coefficient magnitude and earthquake magnitude, which in turn helped us to estimate the earthquake magnitude of an event given its threshold wavelet coefficient. At wavelet scale number 7, we predicted the earthquake magnitude of an event within 2.7 seconds. This means that a magnitude determination is available within 2.7 s after the initial onset of the P-wave. These results shed light on the application of SVM as a way to choose the optimal regression function to estimate the magnitude from a few seconds of an incoming seismogram. This would improve the approaches from Simons et al. (2006) which use an average of the two regression functions to estimate the magnitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen R M and Kanamori H 2003 The potential for earthquake early warning in southern California; Science 300 786–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claerbout J F 1976 Fundamentals of Geophysical Data Processing; McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A I, Daubechies I and Feauveau J 1992 Biorthogonal bases of compactly supported wavelets; Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 45 485–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daubechies I 1990 The wavelet transform, time–frequency localization and signal analysis; IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 36(5) 961–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daubechies I and Sweldens W 1998 Factoring wavelet transforms into lifting steps; J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 4(3) 247–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen A 2001 la Cour-Harbo, Ripples in Mathematics; Springer, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone I M and Silverman B W 1997 Wavelet threshold estimators for data with correlated noise; J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 59(2) 319–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin T L and Wu Y M 2010 Magnitude estimation using the covered areas of strong ground motion in earthquake early warning; Geophys. Res. Lett. 37 L09301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockman A B and Allen R M 2005 Single-station earthquake characterization for early warning; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95(6) 2029–2039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockman A B and Allen R M 2007 Magnitude-period scaling relations for Japan and the Pacific northwest: Implications for earthquake early warning; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97(1) 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallat S 1998 A wavelet tour of signal processing; Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallat S and Zhang Z 1993 Matching pursuits with time–frequency dictionaries; IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 41 3397–3415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y 1988 On the urgent earthquake detection and alarm system (UrEDAS), Proc. 9th World Conf. Earthquake Eng. VII 673–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okaya D E, Karageorgi T, McEvilly and Malin P 1992 Removing vibrator-induced correlation artifacts by filtering in frequency-uncorrelated time space; Geophysics 57 916–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivieri M and Clinton J 2012 An almost fair comparison between Earthworm and SeisComp3; Seismol. Res. Lett. 83(4) 720–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivieri M, Allen R M and Wurman G 2008 The potential for earthquake early warning in Italy using ElarmS; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98 495–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson E L and Allen R M 2005 The deterministic nature of earthquake rupture; Nature 438 212–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refaat M Mohamed and Aly A Farag 2004 Mean field theory for density estimation using support vector machines; 7th Int. Conf. Information Fusion, Stockholm, pp. 495–501.

  • Rioul O and Vetterli M 1991 Wavelets and signal processing; IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 11 14–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons F J, Dando D E and Allen R M 2006 Automatic detection and rapid determination of earthquake magnitude by wavelet multiscale analysis of the primary arrival; Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 250(1–2) 214–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang G and Nguyen T 1997 Wavelets and Filter Banks, 2nd edn, Wellesley-Cambridge Press, Wellesley, Mass.

  • Sweldens W 1996 The lifting scheme: A custom-design construction of biorthogonal wavelets; Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 3(2) 186–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang L, Allen R M and Wurman G 2007 Magnitude scaling relations from P-waves in southern California; Geophys. Res. Lett. 34 L19304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaidyanathan P 1993 Multirate systems and filter banks; Prentice Hall.

  • Vetterli M and Cormac H 1992 Wavelets and filter banks: Theory and design; IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 40 2207–2231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch P D 1967 The use of Fast Fourier Transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms; IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 15 70–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y M and Kanamori H 2005a Rapid assessment of damaging potential of earthquakes in Taiwan from the beginning of P-waves; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95 1181–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y M and Kanamori H 2005b Experiment on an onsite early warning method for the Taiwan early warning system; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95 347–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y M, Hsin-Yi Yen, Li Zhao, Bor-Shouh Huang and Wen-Tzong Liang 2006 Magnitude determination using initial P-waves: A single-station approach; Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 L05306.

  • Wurman G, Allen R M and Lombard P 2007 Toward earthquake early warning in northern California; J. Geophys. Res. 112 B08311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank Dr Frederik J Simons, Princeton University for his initial review, support, encouragement, and useful discussions. The authors sincerely thank the two anonymous reviewers for their help in improving the manuscript considerably. They sincerely thank Dr T Srinivas Kumar, Indian Tsunami Warning Centre at INCOIS Hyderabad for useful discussions. The authors gratefully acknowledge Sharath Shekhar for the data interpretation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to RAJESH R NAIR.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

REDDY, R., NAIR, R.R. The efficacy of support vector machines (SVM) in robust determination of earthquake early warning magnitudes in central Japan. J Earth Syst Sci 122, 1423–1434 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0346-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0346-3

Keywords

Navigation