Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Oceansat-2 and RAMA buoy winds: A comparison

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Sea surface vector winds from scatterometers onboard satellites play an important role to make accurate Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) model analysis over the data sparse oceanic region. Sea surface winds from Oceansat-2 scatterometer (OSCAT) over the Indian Ocean were validated against the Research Moored Array for African–Asian–Australian Monsoon Analysis and Prediction (RAMA) buoy winds to establish the accuracy of OSCAT winds. The comparison of OSCAT winds against RAMA buoy winds for a period of one year (2011) shows that the wind speeds and directions derived from OSCAT agree with RAMA buoy winds. The monthly mean wind speeds from both OSCAT and RAMA buoy show maximum value during the monsoon period as expected. In the complete annual cycle (2011), the monthly mean root mean square differences in the wind speed and wind direction were less than ∼2.5 ms−1 and ∼20°, respectively. The better match between the OSCAT and RAMA buoy wind is observed during Indian summer monsoon (June–September). During monsoon 2011, the root mean square differences in wind speed and wind direction were less than 1.9 ms−1 and 11°, respectively. Collocation of scatterometer winds against equatorial and off-equatorial buoys clearly brought out the monsoon circulation features. Collocation of Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) winds on-board European Space Agency (ESA) MeTop satellite with respect to RAMA buoy winds during monsoon 2011 also showed that the OSCAT wind statistics are comparable with that of ASCAT over the Indian Ocean, and indicates that the accuracy of both the scatterometers over the Indian Ocean are essentially the same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Caballero A, Sagarminaga Y and Espino M 2005 The relationship between satellite and meteorological model-derived winds with those from ocean buoys within the Bay of Biscay; J. Atmos. Ocean Sci. 10(4) 463–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty A, Kumar R and Stoffelen A 2012 Validation of ocean surface winds from the OCEANSAT-2 scatterometer using triple collocation; Rem. Sens. Lett. 4 85–91, doi: 10.1080/2150704x.2012.693967.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Ruijter W P M, Biastoch A, Drijfhout S S, Lutjeharms J R E, Matano R P, Pichevin T, van Leeuwen P J and Weijer W 1999 Indian–Atlantic inter-ocean excange: Dynamics, estimation and impact; J. Geophys. Res. 104(C9) 20,885–20,910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlater J 1966 Cross-equatorial jet streams at low level over Kenya; Meteor. Mag. 95 353–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gohil B S, Sarkar A and Agarwal V K 2008 A new algorithm for wind vector retrieval from scatterometer; IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. Lett. 5 387–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gohil B S, Sharma P, Sikhakoli R and Sarkar A 2010 Directional stability and conservation of scattering (DiSCS) based directional-ambiguity removal algorithm for improving wind-fields from scatterometer: A QuickSCAT example; IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. Lett. 7 592–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon A L 2001 Interocean exchange; In: Ocean Circulation and Climate (eds) Siedler G, Church J and Gould J, Academic Press, pp. 303–314.

  • Goswami B N and Rajagopal E N 2003 Indian Ocean surface winds from NCMRWF analysis as compared to QuikSCAT and moored buoy winds; Proc. Indian Acad. Sci (Earth Planet. Sci.) 112 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami B N and Sengupta D 2003 A note on the deficiency of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis surface winds over the equatorial Indian Ocean; J. Geophys. Res. 108(C4) 3124, doi: 10.1029/2002JC001497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph P V and Raman P L 1966 Existence of low-level westerly jet stream over peninsular India during July; Ind. J. Meteorol. Geophys. 17 407–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu W T and Tang W 1996 Equivalent Neutral Wind; JPL Publ. 96–17, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, US, 16p.

  • McPhaden M J, Meyers G, Ando K, Masumoto Y, Murty V S N, Ravichandran M, Syamsudin F, Vialard J, Yu L and Yu W 2009 RAMA The Research Moored Array for African–Asian–Australian monsoon analysis and prediction; Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 90 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mears C, Smith D and Wentz F J 2001 Comparison of SSM/I and buoy-measured wind speeds from 1987 to 1997; J. Geophys. Res. 106 11,719–11,729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peixoto J P and Oort A H 1992 Physics of Climate (Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Portabella M and Stoffelen A 2009 On scatterometer ocean stress; J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 26(2) 368–382, doi: 10.1175/2008JTECHO578.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad V S, Gupta A, Rajagopal E N and Basu S 2013 Impact of Oscat surface wind data on T574L64 assimilation and forecasting system – a study involving tropical cyclone Thane; Curr. Sci. 104(5) 627–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satheesan K, Sarkar A, Parekh A, Rameshkumar and Kuroda Y 2007 Comparison of wind data from QuikSCAT and buoys in the Indian Ocean; Int. J. Remote Sens. 28 2375–2382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathiyamoorthy V, Sikhakolli R, Gohil B S and Pal P K 2012 Intra-seasonal variability in Oceansat-2 scatterometer sea-surface winds over the Indian summer monsoon region; Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., doi: 10.1007/s00703-012-0189-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Kumar P and Pal P K 2011 Assimilation of Oceansat-2-scatterometer-derived surface winds in the weather research and forecasting model; IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2164410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoffelen A, Vogelzang J and Verhoef A 2010 Verification of scatterometer winds; 10th International Winds Workshop, 20/2/2010–26/2/2010, (eds) Forsythe M and Daniels J, Tokyo, Japan, JMA, EUMETSAT, Volledige tekst.

  • Sudha A K and Prasada Rao C V K 2013 Comparison of Oceansat-2 scatterometer winds with buoy observations over the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean; Rem. Sens. Lett. 4(2) 171–179, doi: 10.1080/2150704X.2012.713140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogelzang J, Stoffelen A, Verhoef A and Figa-Saldana J 2011 On the quality of high-resolution scatterometer winds; J. Geophys. Res. 116 C10033, doi: 10.1029/2010jC006640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Authors are grateful to the Director, NCMRWF for the encouragement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (NCMRWF), A-50, Institutional Area, Sector-62, Noida, 201 309, India

    S Indira Rani & M Das Gupta

Authors
  1. S Indira Rani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M Das Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Indira Rani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rani, S.I., Gupta, M.D. Oceansat-2 and RAMA buoy winds: A comparison. J Earth Syst Sci 122, 1571–1582 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0368-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0368-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation