Abstract
We have compared the non-linear wave packet dynamics of coherent states of various symmetry groups and found that certain generic features of non-linear evolution are present in each case. Thus the initial coherent structures are quickly destroyed but are followed by Schrödinger cat formation and revival. We also report important differences in their evolution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Such revivals have been studied extensively in Rydberg atoms (see ref. [2]), in optical parametric oscillators (see ref. [3]), in the Jaynes-Cummings model (see ref. [4]) and also, in a general way, in the temporal behavior of generic transient signals originating from multilevel quantum systems (see ref. [5]). See also the recent papers on square well potentials
D L Aronstein and C Stroud, Phys. Rev. A55, 4526 (1997)
F Grobmann, J M Rost and W P Schleich, J. Phys. A30, L277 (1997)
I Sh. Averbukh and N F Perelman, Phys. Lett. A139, 449 (1989)
M Nauenberg, J. Phys. B23, L385 (1990)
G Alber, H Ritsch and P Zoller, Phys. Rev. A34, 1058 (1986)
Z D Gaeta and C R Stroud Jr., Phys. Rev. 42, 6308 (1990)
R Bluhm, V Alan Kostelecky and B Tudose, Phys. Rev. 52, 2234 (1995); 53, 937 (1996)
I V Jyotsna and G S Agarwal, J. Mod. Opt. 44, 305 (1997)
G S Agarwal and J Banerji, Phys. Rev. A55, R4007 (1997)
G Drobny and I Jex, Phys. Rev. 45, 1816 (1992)
J H Eberly, N B Narozhny and J J Sanchez-Mondragon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1323 (1980)
P L Knight and B W Shore, Phys. Rev. A48, 642 (1993)
G Rempe, H Walther and N Klein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 353 (1987)
C Leichtle, I Sh Averbukh and W P Schleich, Phys. Rev. A54, 5299 (1996)
Fractional revivals have been observed experimentally in the motion of atomic Rydberg wave packets
J A Yeazell and C R Stroud, Phys. Rev. A43, 5153 (1991)
D R Meacher, P E Meyler, I G Hughes and P Ewart, J. Phys. B24, L6 3(1991)
J Wals, H H Fielding, J F Christian, L C Snoek, W J van der Zande and H B van Linden van den Heuvell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3783 (1994) and in molecular vibrational wave packets
M J J Vrakking, D M Villeneuve and A Stolow, Phys. Rev. A54, R37 (1996)
B Yurke and D Stoler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 13 (1986)
G J Milburn and C A Holmes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2237 (1986)
W Schleich, M Pernigo and Fam Le Kien, Phys. Rev. A44, 2172 (1991)
K Tara, G S Agarwal and S Chaturvedi, Phys. Rev. 47, 5024 (1993)
V Bužek, H Moya-Cessa and P L Knight, Phys. Rev. 45, 8190 (1992)
R Tanaś, Ts Gantsog, A Miranowicz and S Kielich, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B8, 1576 (1991)
G C Gerry, Opt. Commun. 63, 278 (1987)
D L Aronstein and C Stroud, Phys. Rev. A55, 4526 (1997)
F Grobmann, J M Rost and W P Schleich, J. Phys. A30, L277 (1997)
M J J Vrakking, D M Villeneuve and A Stolow, Phys. Rev. A54, R37 (1996)
G S Agarwal, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B5, 1940 (1988)
A M Perelomov, Generalized coherent states and their applications (Springer, Berlin (1986);
Coherent states edited by J R Klauder and B S Skagerstam (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985)
C M Caves and B L Shumaker, Phys. Rev. A31, 3068, 3093 (1985)
J Banerji and G S Agarwal, Phys. Rev. A59, 4777 (1999)
R R Puri and G S Agarwal, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B10, 1563 (1996); Phys. Rev. A53, 1786 (1996) For earlier work on SU(1,1) coherent and squeezed states, see Satya Prakash and G S Agarwal, Phys. Rev. A50, 4258 (1994); 52 (1995)
C C Gerry and R Grobe, Phys. Rev. A51, 4123 (1995)
K Wódkiewicz and J H Eberly, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B2, 458 (1985)
V Bužek and T Quang, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B6, 2447 (1989)
A Luis and J Peřina, Phys. Rev. A53, 1886 (1996)
G S Agarwal, R R Puri and R P Singh, Phys. Rev. A56, 2249 (1997)
J H Hannay and M V Berry, Physica D1, 267 (1980)
U Leonhardt, Measuring the quantum state of light (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997)
Details are to be found in G S Agarwal and J Banerji, Phys. Rev. A57, 3880 (1998)
A O Barut and L Girardello, Commun. Math. Phys. 21, 41 (1971)
C C Gerry and R Grobe, Phys. Rev. A51, 4123 (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Banerji, J. Non-linear wave packet dynamics of coherent states. Pramana - J Phys 56, 267–280 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-001-0123-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-001-0123-8