Abstract
We have explored the shear viscosity and electrical conductivity calculations for bosonic and fermionic media, without and with presence of an external magnetic field. For numerical visualisation, we have dealt with their simplified massless expressions. In the presence of a magnetic field, five independent velocity gradient tensors can be designed, and so their corresponding proportional coefficients, connected with the viscous stress tensor, provide us five components of the shear viscosity coefficient. In the existing literature, two sets of viscous stress tensors are available. Starting from them, the present work has obtained expressions for two sets of five shear viscosity coefficients, which can be ultimately classified into three basic components – parallel, perpendicular and Hall components as one get similar expression for the electrical conductivity at the finite magnetic field. Our calculations are based on the kinetic theory approach in relaxation time approximation. Repeating the same mathematical steps under finite magnetic field, which is traditionally practiced in the absence of magnetic field, we have obtained two sets of five shear viscosity components, whose final expressions are in good agreements with earlier references, although a difference in methodology or steps can be noticed. In this context, the present work, for the first time, addresses a detailed calculation of relaxation time approximation (RTA)-based kinetic theory calculations of the second set of five shear viscosity components, which was previously done by Denicol et al (Phys. Rev. D 98, 076009 (2018)) in moment method technique. Realising the massless results of viscosity and conductivity for Maxwell–Boltzmann, Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein distribution functions, we have applied them for massless quark gluon plasma and hadronic matter phases, which can provide us a rough order of strength, within which actual results will vary during quark–hadron phase transition. The present work also indicates that the magnetic field might have some role in building perfect fluid nature in RHIC or LHC matter. The lower bound expectation of shear viscosity to entropy density ratio is also discussed. Here, for the first time, we are addressing an analytic expression of temperature- and magnetic field-dependent relaxation time of the massless fluid, for which perpendicular component of shear viscosity to entropy density ratio can reach its lower bound.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
I A Shovkovy, Lect. Notes Phys. 871, 13 (2013), arXiv:1207.5081 [hep-ph]
A Bzdak and V Skokov, Phys. Lett. B 710, 171 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.02.065 [arXiv:1111.1949 [hep-ph]]
M D Elia, Lect. Notes Phys. 871, 181 (2013), arXiv:1209.0374 [hep-lat]
G S Bali, F Bruckmann, G Endrodi, Z Fodor, S D Katz and A Schafer, Phys. Rev. D 86, 071502(R) (2012)
G S Bali, F Bruckmann, G Endrodi, S D Katz and A Schafer, J High Energy Phys. 1408, 177 (2014)
N Mueller, J A Bonnet and C S Fischer, Phys. Rev. D 89, 094023 (2014), arXiv:1401.1647 [hep-ph]
V A Miransky and I A Shovkovy, Phys. Rep. 576, 1 (2015), arXiv:1503.00732 [hep-ph]
Jens O Andersen, William R Taylor and Anders Tranberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 025001 (2016), arxiv:1411:7176
K Tuchin, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013, 490495 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/490495, arXiv:1301.0099 [hep-ph]
W T Deng and X G Huang, Phys. Rev. C 85, 044907 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.044907arXiv:1201.5108 [nucl-th]]
D Satow, Phys. Rev. D 90, 034018 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.034018, arXiv:1406.7032 [hep-ph]
V Skokov, A Illarionov and V Toneev, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 5925 (2009)
V Roy, S Pu, L Rezzolla and D Rischke, Phys. Lett. B 750, 45 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.08.046arXiv:1506.06620 [nucl-th]
S Pu, V Roy, L Rezzolla and D H Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074022 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.074022, arXiv:1602.04953 [nucl-th]
M Hongo, Y Hirono and T Hirano, arXiv:1309.2823 [nucl-th]
G Inghirami, L Del Zanna, A Beraudo, M H Moghaddam, F Becattini and M Bleicher, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 659 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4516-8, arXiv:1609.03042 [hep-ph]
S K Das, S Plumari, S Chatterjee, J Alam, F Scardina and V Greco, Phys. Lett. B 768, 260 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.02.046, arXiv:1608.02231 [nucl-th]
E M Lifshitz and L P Pitaevskii, Physical kinetics (Pergamon Press, UK, 1987)
K Tuchin, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 39, 025010 (2012)
S Li and H-U Yee, Phys. Rev. D 97, 056024 (2018)
P Mohanty, A Dash and V Roy, Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 35 (2019)
S Ghosh, B Chatterjee, P Mohanty, A Mukharjee and H Mishra, Phys. Rev. D 100, 034024 (2019), aXiv:1804.00812 [hep-ph]
S Nam and C-W Kao, Phys. Rev. D 87, 114003 (2013)
A N Tawfik, A M Diab and M T Hussein, Int. J. Adv. Res. Phys. Sci. 3, 4 (2016)
J Dey, S Satapathy, A Mishra, S Paul and S Ghosh, From non-interacting to interacting picture of quark gluon plasma in presence of magnetic field and its fluid property, arXiv:1908.04335 [hep-ph]
A Dash, S Samanta, J Dey, U Gangopadhyaya, S Ghosh and V Roy, Phys. Rev. D 102, 016016 (2020), arxiv:2002.08781 [nucl-th]
A Das, H Mishra and R K Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 100, 114004 (2019)
G S Denicol, X G Huang, E Molnr, G M Monteiro, H Niemi, J Noronha, D H Rischke and Q Wang, Phys. Rev. D 98, 076009 (2018)
Z Chen, C Greiner, A Huang and Z Xu, Phys. Rev. D 101, 056020 (2020)
A Harutyunyan and A Sedrakian, Phys. Rev. C 94, 025805 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.025805, arXiv:1605.07612 [astro-ph.HE]
B O Kerbikov and M A Andreichikov, Phys. Rev. D 91, 074010 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.074010arXiv:1410.3413 [hep-ph]
S i Nam, Phys. Rev. D 86, 033014 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.033014, arXiv:1207.3172 [hep-ph]
K Hattori, S Li, D Satow and H U Yee, Phys. Rev. D 95, 076008 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.076008, arXiv:1610.06839 [hep-ph]
M Kurian, S Mitra, S Ghosh and V Chandra, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 134 (2019)
M Kurian and V Chandra, Phys. Rev. D 96, 114026 (2017)
B Feng, Phys. Rev. D 96, 036009 (2017)
K Fukushima and Y Hidaka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 162301 (2018)
A. Das, H Mishra and R K Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 99, 094031 (2019)
A Das, H Mishra and R K Mohapatra, arXiv:1907.05298 [hep-ph]
S Ghosh, A Bandyopadhyay, R L S Farias, J Dey and G Krein, Phys Rev. D 102, 114015 (2020), arXiv:1911.10005
L Thakur and P K Srivastava, Phys. Rev. D 100, 076016 (2019)
B Chatterjee, R Rath, G Sarwar and R Sahoo, arXiv:1908.01121 [hep-ph]
M Kurian, arXiv:2005.04247 [nucl-th]
K Hattori, X G Huang, D H Rischke and D Satow, arXiv:1708.00515 [hep-ph]
X-G Huang, M Huang, D H Rischke and A Sedrakian, Phys. Rev. D 81, 045015 (2010)
N O Agasian, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 76, 1382 (2013)
N O Agasian, JETP Lett. 95, 171 (2012)
M Kurian and V Chandra, Phys. Rev. D 97, 116008 (2018)
M Kurian, S K Das and V Chandra, arXiv:1907.09556 [nucl-th]
B Singh, L Thakur and H Mishra, Phys. Rev. D 97, 096011 (2018)
R Critelli, S I Finazzo, M Zaniboni and J Noronha, Phys. Rev. D 90, 066006 (2014)
S I Finazzo, R Critelli, R Rougemont and J Noronha, Phys. Rev. D 94, 054020 (2016)
K A Mamo, JHEP 1308, 083 (2013)
S Jeon, Phys. Rev. D 52, 3591 (1995)
D Fernandez-Fraile and A G Nicola, Eur. Phys. J. C 62, 37 (2009)
S Ghosh, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, 1450054 (2014)
P Chakraborty and J I Kapusta, Phys. Rev. C 83, 014906 (2011)
S Gavin, Nucl. Phys. A 435, 826 (1985)
P Kovtun, D T Son and A O Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 111601 (2005)
T Schafer and D Teaney, Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 126001 (2009)
X G Huang, M Huang and D H Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 81, 045015 (2010)
X G Huang, A Sedrakian and D H Rischke, Ann. Phys. 326, 3075 (2011)
A Bandyopadhyay and R L S Farias, arXiv: 2003.11054 [hep-ph]
R L S Farias, K P Gomes, G I Krein and M B Pinto, Phys. Rev. C 90, 025203 (2014)
R L S Farias, V S Timoteo, S S Avancini, M B Pinto and G Krein, Eur. Phys. J. A A 53, 101 (2017)
Acknowledgements
JD, SS and SG acknowledge the theoretical research facilities of IIT Bhilai, funded by MHRD. PM is grateful for (payment-basis) the hospitality from IIT Bhilai during his summer internship tenure (May–June, 2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: \(C_n\) calculations
1.1 Appendix A.1. For tensors of ref. [18]
The detailed calculations of \(C_n\) for traceless independent tensors of ref. [18] from the RTA-based RBE, given in eq. (10), will be documented in this section.
For zero bulk viscosity and knowing that the tensors \(V_{ij}\) is symmetric, \(b_{ij}\) is antisymmetric in i, j we get some relations: \(\mathbf {\nabla } \cdot \mathbf {V}=V_{ii}=0\), \(V_{ij}b_{i}b_{j}=0\), \(b_{ij}b_{i}=b_{ij}b_{j}=0\), \(b_{ij}v_{i}v_{j}=0\). Using the above conditions, eq. (10) takes the form
Now, from eq. (A.2) comparing the following tensor structures,
Solving the above four equations, we finally get Cs as
1.2 Appendix A.2. For tensors of refs [61, 62]
Here, \(C_n\)s for tensor of eq. (19) [61, 62] will be calculated.
Using \(C_{ij}\)s of eq. (19) in eq. (10) with tensor identities used in the above subsection we get
Now, from eq. (A.7) comparing the following tensor structures,
Solving the above four equations, we finally get Cs as
Appendix B: Massless results
1.1 Appendix B.1. Thermodynamics of massless quark at \(B=0\)
Here we have shown explicit calculation of energy density, pressure and entropy density for quasiparticle system considering mass \(m=0\) for MB, BE, FD at \(B=0\).
Thermal distribution function can be written in a general way in the form
where \(a=0\) for MB, \(a=1\) for FD and \(a=-1\) for BE statistics.
BE: Energy density for bosons is given by
Here \(E = p\) which gives us
and the integral becomes
Substituting \(\beta E = x\) giving
gives us
This integral can be converted into a \(\zeta (s)\) function by using
where \(\Gamma (s)\) is the gamma function.
Using \(\zeta (4) = {\pi ^4}/{90}\) and \(\Gamma (4) = 3! \), the corresponding pressure density is
The entropy density is
FD: Energy density for fermion is
\(E = p\) which gives the integral
Substituting \(\beta E = x\) we get
Pressure density of fermions is given by
The entropy density is given by
MB: For the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution, the energy density is given by
Since \(E = p\) the energy density calculated by changing the integral to a beta function is
The pressure density is \( P = {\epsilon }/{3}\)
The entropy density is given by
1.2 Appendix B.2. Shear viscosity and electrical conductivity of massless quark at \(B=0\)
Here we have shown the detailed derivation of \(\eta (T)\) and \(\sigma (T)\) for MB, BE, FD at \(B= 0\) for massless quasiparticle system. The shear viscosity \(\eta \) for bosons is given by
Here \(E = p\) which gives us
The shear viscosity for fermions is given by
The above two expressions are written as
for fermions and
for bosons, where the constant A is the substitution for
\(I_1\) integral is evaluated as follows:
where
is the distribution function for fermions.
By using the definition of d(s) and \(\zeta (s)\) functions we solve the above integral as
Thus
The integral for bosons is
Substituting \(\beta p = x\) we get
Using the definition of \(\zeta (s)\) the integral is calculated as
\(\eta |_{\mathrm {bosons}}\) is obtained as
For Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution, the shear viscosity is obtained as follows:
where \(f_0 = \mathrm {e}^{-\beta E}\) and here \(E = p\).
where
and
Electrical conductivity \(\sigma \) for different distributions is calculated as follows:
MB: For Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution, the electrical conductivity is
The distribution function is \(f_0 = \mathrm {e}^{-\beta p}\) for Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution.
Substituting \(\beta p = x\) we get
FD: The electrical conductivity of fermions is given by
where the distribution function of fermions is given by
Using the definition of \(\zeta (s)\) the integral is evaluated to be
where \(\Gamma (4) =3!\)
BE: For bosons, \(\sigma \) is
where the distribution function of bosons is given by
where the integral I is given by
is solved as follows:
Putting this in the expression for conductivity, we get
1.3 Appendix B.3. Thermal average energy
The expressions of viscosity and conductivity contain magnetic relaxation time \(\tau _B\) which is \(\tau _B={E}/{qB}\). But for simplicity of calculation we shall consider average energy for \(\tau _B\) calculation. So, \(\tau _B={\langle E \rangle }/{qB}.\)
MB: Average energy for Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution with \(E =p\)
FD: Average energy for fermions is
Using the definition of \(\zeta (s)\) and substituting \(\beta p =x\) the above integral is evaluated as
BE: Average energy of bosons with \(E =p\)
Using the definition of \(\zeta (s)\) and substituting \(\beta p =x \) the integral can be solved as
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dey, J., Satapathy, S., Murmu, P. et al. Shear viscosity and electrical conductivity of the relativistic fluid in the presence of a magnetic field: A massless case. Pramana - J Phys 95, 125 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-021-02148-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-021-02148-3