Skip to main content
Log in

Exterior beam-column joint study with non-conventional reinforcement detailing using mechanical anchorage under reversal loading

  • Published:
Sadhana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reinforced concrete structures beam-column joints are the most critical regions in seismic prone areas. Proper reinforcement anchorage is essential to enhance the performance of the joints. An attempt has been made to appraise the performance of the anchorages and joints. The anchorages are detailed as per ACI-352 (mechanical anchorages), ACI-318 (conventional bent hooks) and IS-456 (conventional full anchorage). The joints are detailed without confinement in group-I and with additional X-cross bar in group-II. To assess the seismic performance, the specimens are assembled into two groups of three specimens each and were tested under reversal loading, The specimen with T-type mechanical anchorage (Headed bar) and T-type mechanical anchorage combination with X-cross bar exhibited significant improvement in seismic performance: load-displacement capacity, displacement ductility, stiffness degradation, controlled crack capacity in the joint shear panel and also reduced congestion of reinforcement in joint core.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACI-352 2002 Recommendations for design of beam-column connections in monolithic reinforced concrete structures (reported by Joint ACI-ASCE committee 352). USA: American concrete Institute

  • ACI-318 2011 Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary (reported by ACI committee 318). Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA: American Concrete Institute

  • Bindhu K R, Jeya K P and Manicka Selvam V K 2008 Seismic resistance of exterior beam-column joints with non-conventional confinement reinforcement detailing. Struct. Eng. Mech. 30(6): 733–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chutarat N and Aboutaha R S 2003 Cyclic response of exterior reinforcement concrete beam-column joints reinforced with headed bars-experimental investigation. ACI Struct. J. 100(2): 259–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun S-C, Lee S-H, Kang T H-K, Oh B and Wallace J W 2007 Mechanical anchorage in exterior beam-column joints subjected to cyclic loading. ACI Struct. J. 104(1): 102–113

    Google Scholar 

  • IS-456 2000 Indian standard plain and reinforced concrete code of practice (Bureau of Indian Standards). New Delhi, India

  • IS-13920 1993 Indian standard ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces code of practice (Bureau of Indian Standards), New Delhi, India

  • Kang T H-K, Shin M, Mitra N and Bonacci J F 2009 Seismic design of reinforced concrete beam-column joints with headed bars. ACI Struct. J. 106(6): 868–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang T H-K, Ha S-S and Choi D U 2010 Bar pullout tests and seismic tests of small-headed bars in beam-column joints. ACI Struct. J. 107(1): 32–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee H J and Yu Si Ying 2009 Cyclic response of exterior beam-column joints with different anchorage methods. ACI Struct. J. 106(3): 329–339

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Misir I S and Kahraman S 2013 Strengthening of non-seismically detailed reinforced concrete beam–column joints using SIFCON blocks. Sadhana - Acad. Proc. Eng. Sci. 38(1): 69–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Murty C V R, Rai D C, Bajpai K K and Jain Sudhir K 2003 Effectiveness of reinforcement details in exterior reinforcement concrete beam-column joints for earthquake resistance. ACI Struct. J. 100(2): 149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulay T 1989 Equilibrium criteria for reinforcement concrete beam-column joints. ACI Struct. J. 86(6): 635–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Park R and Paulay T 1975 Reinforced concrete structures. New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sagbas G, Vecchio F J and Christopoulos C 2011 Computational modeling of the seismic performance of beam-column sub assemblies. J. Earthq. Eng. 15(4): 640–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsonos A G, Tegos I A and Penelis G 1993 Seismic Resistance of Type 2 Exterior beam-column joints reinforcement with inclined bars. ACI Struct. J. 89(1): 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Uma S R and Sudhir K Jain 2006 Seismic design of beam-column joints on RC moment resisting frames-review of codes. Struct. Eng. Mech. 23(5): 579–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallance J W, McConnell SW, Guta P and Cote P A 1998 Used of headed reinforcement in beam-column joints subjected to earthquake loads. ACI Struct. J. 95(5): 590–606

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Department of Civil Engineering, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Sivakasi, Tamil Nadu, India for extending the facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S RAJAGOPAL.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

RAJAGOPAL, S., PRABAVATHY, S. Exterior beam-column joint study with non-conventional reinforcement detailing using mechanical anchorage under reversal loading. Sadhana 39, 1185–1200 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-014-0229-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-014-0229-6

Keywords

Navigation