Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Real-time underwater image enhancement: An improved approach for imaging with AUV-150

  • Published:
Sadhana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An RGB YCbCr Processing method (RYPro) is proposed for underwater images commonly suffering from low contrast and poor color quality. The degradation in image quality may be attributed to absorption and backscattering of light by suspended underwater particles. Moreover, as the depth increases, different colors are absorbed by the surrounding medium depending on the wavelengths. In particular, blue/green color is dominant in the underwater ambience which is known as color cast. For further processing of the image, enhancement remains an essential preprocessing operation. Color equalization is a widely adopted approach for underwater image enhancement. Traditional methods normally involve blind color equalization for enhancing the image under test. In the present work, processing sequence of the proposed method includes noise removal using linear and non-linear filters followed by adaptive contrast correction in the RGB and YCbCr color planes. Performance of the proposed method is evaluated and compared with three golden methods, namely, Gray World (GW), White Patch (WP), Adobe Photoshop Equalization (APE) and a recently developed method entitled “Unsupervised Color Correction Method (UCM)”. In view of its simplicity and computational ease, the proposed method is recommended for real-time applications. Suitability of the proposed method is validated by real-time implementation during the testing of the Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV-150) developed indigenously by CSIR-CMERI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1 In general, vision (e.g. camera) aided navigation requires on-board real-time enhancement of images acquired by the AUV.

References

  1. Chiang J Y and Chen Y. -C. 2012 Underwater image enhancement by wavelength compensation and dehazing. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21 (4): 1756–1769

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Pegau W S, Gray D and Zaneveld J R V 1997 Absorption and attenuation of visible and near-infrared light in water: Dependence on temperature and salinity. Appl. Opt. 36 (24): 6035–6046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schechner Y Y and Karpel N 2005 Recovery of underwater visibility and structure by polarization analysis. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 30 (3): 570–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sedlazeck A and Koch R 2011 Simulating deep sea underwater images using physical models for light attenuation, scattering, and refraction. Vision, Modeling, and Visualization Workshop, pp 49–56

  5. Trucco E and Olmos-Antillon A T 2006 Self-tuning underwater image restoration. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 31 (2): 511–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iqbal K, Salam R A, Osman A and Talib A Z 2007 Underwater image enhancement using an integrated colour model. IAENG Int. J. Comput. Sci. 32 (2): 239–244

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iqbal K, Odetayo M, James A, Salam R A and Talib A 2010 Enhancing the low quality images using unsupervised colour correction method. IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Man Cybern. (SMC), pp 1703–1709

  8. Kwok N, Wang D, Jia X, Chen S, Fang G and Ha Q 2011 Gray world based color correction and intensity preservation for image enhancement. Int. Congress Image Signal Process. (CISP) 2: 994–998

    Google Scholar 

  9. Provenzi E, Gatta C, Fierro M and Rizzi A 2008 A spatially variant white-patch and gray-world method for color image enhancement driven by local contrast. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 30 (10): 1757–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahlen J, Sundgren D, Lindell T and Bengtsson E 2005 Dissolved organic matters impact on colour reconstruction in underwater images. Image Anal.: pp 1148–1156

  11. Chikane V and Fuh C -S 2006 Automatic white balance for digital still cameras. J. Inf. Sci. Eng. 22 (3): 497–509

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta M, Narasimhan S G and Schechner Y Y 2008 On controlling light transport in poor visibility environments. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition pp 1–8

  13. Bier E, Stone M and Pier K 1997 Enhanced illustration using magic lens filters. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 17 (6): 62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tan K and Oakley J P 2001 Physics-based approach to color image enhancement in poor visibility conditions. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18 (10): 2460–2467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Torres-Mendez L A and Dudek G 2005 A statistical learning-based method for color correction of underwater images. In: Gelbukh A and Monroy R (Eds.) Research on computer science Vol. 17, Advances in artificial intelligence theory, pp 151–160

  16. Lam C 2011 Image enhancement using thresholding techniques and histogram equalization. PhD thesis, University of California, Irvine

  17. Karunakaran V and Venugopal T 1998 The Weierstrass transform for a class of generalized functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 220 (2): 508–527

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Perona P and Malik J 1990 Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12 (7): 629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gerig G, Kubler O, Kikinis R and Jolesz F A 1992 Nonlinear anisotropic filtering of MRI data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 11 (2): 221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Loupas T, McDicken W N and Allan P L 1989 An adaptive weighted median filter for speckle suppression in medical ultrasonic images. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 36 (1): 129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Qui F, Berglund J, Jensen J R, Thakkar P and Ren D 2004 Speckle noise reduction in SAR imagery using a local adaptive median filter. GISci. Remote Sensing 41 (3): 244–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Singhai J and Rawat P 2007 Image enhancement method for underwater, ground and satellite images using brightness preserving histogram equalization with maximum entropy. International Conference on Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications 3: 507–512

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pizer S M, Amburn E P, Austin J D, Cromartie R, Geselowitz A, Greer T, ter H. R. B, Zimmerman J B and Zuiderveld K 1987 Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations. Computer Vis. Graph. Image Process. 39 (3): 355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shome S N, Nandy S, Das S K, Pal D, Mahanty B, Kumar V, Ray R and Banerji D 2010 Autonomous underwater vehicle for 150m depth – development phases and hurdles faced. In: Vadakkepat P et al (Eds.) Trends in Intelligent Robotics, pp 49–56

  25. Shome S N, Nandy S, Pal D, Das S K, Vadali S R K, Basu J and Ghosh S 2012 Development of modular shallow water AUV: Issues & trial results. J. Inst. Eng. (India): Series C 93 (3): 217–228

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jha R K, Chouhan R, Biswas P K and Aizawa K 2012 Internal noise-induced contrast enhancement of dark images. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp 973–976

  27. Agaian S S, Panetta K and Grigoryan A M 2000 A new measure of image enhancement. In: IASTED International Conference on Signal Processing & Communication, pp 19–22

  28. Mukherjee J and Mitra S K 2008 Enhancement of color images by scaling the DCT coefficients. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 17 (10): 1783–1794

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Banerjee J, Ray R, Vadali S R K, Layek R K and Shome S N 2013 Shape recognition based on shape-signature identification and condensibility: Application to underwater imagery. IEEE National Conference on Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition, Image Processing and Graphics (NCVPRIPG), pp 1–4

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank CSIR and to the Ministry of Earth Sciences, Govt of India for providing financial assistance to carry out the work . The authors wish to express sincere thanks to all Robotics & Automation Group members for their help and support. We are thankful to Dr. Rajlaxmi Chouhan of Computer Vision Laboratory, Dept. of E & ECE, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur for her valuable insights in preparing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechatronics, CSIR-Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, Durgapur, 713209, India

    JEET BANERJEE

  2. Robotics and Automation Division, CSIR-Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, Durgapur, 713209, India

    RANJIT RAY, SIVA RAM KRISHNA VADALI, SANKAR NATH SHOME & SAMBHUNATH NANDY

Authors
  1. JEET BANERJEE
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. RANJIT RAY
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. SIVA RAM KRISHNA VADALI
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. SANKAR NATH SHOME
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. SAMBHUNATH NANDY
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to RANJIT RAY.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

BANERJEE, J., RAY, R., VADALI, S.R.K. et al. Real-time underwater image enhancement: An improved approach for imaging with AUV-150. Sadhana 41, 225–238 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-015-0446-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-015-0446-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation