Abstract
A novel intra-ply woven fabric polyester composite with glass fibre yarns in one direction and natural fibre yarns in another direction of basket-type woven fabric has been investigated for mechanical and dynamic mechanical characteristics. Individual glass fibre woven fabric, natural fibres woven fabric and intra-ply natural fibres woven fabric composites are also investigated for the comparison purpose. Results reveal that the intra-ply woven fabric hybridization enhances impact and damping properties of the composite significantly than the tensile and flexural properties. Intra-ply woven fabrics with glass fibre yarns in warp direction and jute fibre yarns in weft direction (WGWJ) exhibit better impact properties compared with woven fabric with other combinations. Dynamic mechanical analysis results reveal that intra-ply woven fabric composite with glass fibre yarns in warp direction and jute and banana fibre yarns in weft direction (WGWJAB) gives higher damping characteristics due to the multi-level interaction between fibre–fibre and fibre–matrix interactions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Venkateshwaran N, Elayaperumal A and Raj R A 2012 Mechanical and dynamic mechanical analysis of woven banana–epoxy composite. J. Polym. Environ. 20(2): 565–672
Landel R F and Nielsen L E 1993 Mechanical properties of polymers and composites. Boca Raton: CRC Press
Saheb D N and Jog J 1999 Natural fiber polymer composites: a review. Adv. Polym. Technol. 18(4): 351–363
Fu S Y, Lauke B, Mder E, Yue C Y and Hu X 2000 Tensile properties of short-glass-fiber- and short-carbon-fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 31(10): 1117–1125
Lassila L, Nohrstrm T and Vallittu P 2002 The influence of short-term water storage on the flexural properties of unidirectional glass fiber-reinforced composites. Biomaterials 23(10): 2221–2229
Dweib M, Hu B, ODonnell A, Shenton H and Wool R 2004 All natural composite sandwich beams for structural applications. Compos. Struct. 63(2): 147–157
Elbadry E A, Aly-Hassan M S and Hamada H 2012 Mechanical properties of natural jute fabric/jute mat fiber reinforced polymer matrix hybrid composites. Adv. Mech. Eng. 4: 354547
Joshi S, Drzal L, Mohanty A and Arora S 2004 Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites? Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 35(3): 371–376
Corbire-Nicollier T, Laban B G, Lundquist L, Leterrier Y, Mnson J A and Jolliet O 2001 Life cycle assessment of biofibres replacing glass fibres as reinforcement in plastics. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 33(4): 267–287
Venkateshwaran N, Elayaperumal A, Alavudeen A and Thiruchitrambalam M 2011 Mechanical and water absorption behaviour of banana–sisal reinforced. Mater. Des. 32(7): 4017–4021
Sastra H Y, Siregar J P, Sapuan S M and Hamdan M M 2006 Tensile properties of arenga pinnata fiber-reinforced epoxy composites. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 45(1): 149–155
Okubo K, Fujii T and Yamamoto Y 2004 Development of bamboo-based polymer composites and their mechanical properties. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 35(3): 377–383. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.017
Venkateshwaran N and ElayaPerumal A 2012 Mechanical and water absorption properties of woven jute–banana hybrid composites. Fibers Polym. 13(7): 907–914
Santulli C, Sarasini F, Tirillò J, Valente T, Valente M, Caruso A, et al 2013 Mechanical behaviour of jute cloth–wool felts hybrid laminates. Mater. Des. 50: 309–321
Jawaid M, Khalil H A and Bakar A A 2011 Woven hybrid composites: tensile and flexural properties of oil palm–woven jute fibres based epoxy composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528(15): 5190–5195
Ahmed K S and Vijayarangan S 2008 Tensile, flexural and interlaminar shear properties of woven jute and jute–glass fabric reinforced polyester composites. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 207(13): 330–335
Harish S, Michael D P, Bensely A, Lal D M and Rajadurai A 2009 Mechanical property evaluation of natural fiber coir composite. Mater. Charact. 60(1): 44–49
Ramesh M, Palanikumar K and Reddy K H 2013 Mechanical property evaluation of sisal–jute–glass fiber reinforced polyester composites. Compos. Part B: Eng. 48: 1–9
Thwe M M and Liao K 2002 Effects of environmental aging on the mechanical properties of bamboo–glass fiber reinforced polymer matrix hybrid composites. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 33(1): 43–52
Velmurugan R and Manikandan V 2007 Mechanical properties of palmyra–glass fiber hybrid composites. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 38(10): 2216–2226
Idicula M, Malhotra S, Joseph K and Thomas S 2005 Dynamic mechanical analysis of randomly oriented intimately mixed short banana–sisal hybrid fibre reinforced polyester composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 65(78): 1077–1087
Tajvidi M, Falk R H and Hermanson J C 2006 Effect of natural fibers on thermal and mechanical properties of natural fiber polypropylene composites studied by dynamic mechanical analysis. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 101(6): 4341–4349
Devi L U, Bhagawan S and Thomas S 2010 Dynamic mechanical analysis of pineapple leaf–glass hybrid fiber reinforced polyester composites. Polym. Compos. 31(6): 956–965
Tao Y, Yan L and Jie R 2009 Preparation and properties of short natural fiber reinforced poly(lactic acid) composites. Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China 19: s651–s655
Jeyaraj P, Ganesan N and Padmanabhan C 2009 Vibration and acoustic response of a composite plate with inherent material damping in a thermal environment. J. Sound Vib. 320(1): 322–338
Rajesh M and Pitchaimani J 2016 Dynamic mechanical analysis and free vibration behavior of intra-ply woven natural fiber hybrid polymer composite. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 35(3): 228–242
Acknowledgement
Authors wish to thank Material Characterization Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, NITK, Surathkal, for the tensile and flexural tests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rajesh, M., Pitchaimani, J. Mechanical and dynamic mechanical behaviour of novel glass–natural fibre intra-ply woven polyester composites. Sādhanā 42, 1215–1223 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-017-0676-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-017-0676-y