Abstract
Household energy consumption is a significant driver of greenhouse gas emissions associated with global climate change. Thus, identifying social and psychological determinants of household-level consumption warrants further study. Using nationally representative samples from Canada (N = 1220) and the USA (N = 1001), we examine the impact of three categories of behavioral antecedents on decision to purchase energy-efficient technology: values, environmental concern, and lifestyle orientation. Green lifestyle orientation refers to the importance of environmental action to one’s overall lifestyle, a theory that has been primarily explained through qualitative methods. We report three key findings comparing US and Canadian green technology purchasing intentions. The results of three structural equation models suggest the presence of a relationship between biospheric and altruistic values, environmental concern, and green lifestyle orientation that predict green technology purchasing intention in both samples. Additionally, income has a strong effect on purchase intentions in both US and Canadian consumers. Other sociodemographic factors also influence potential purchases and identifying as female was positively related to electric vehicle purchase intention in the US sample, but this relationship did not hold in the Canadian sample. We suggest that future research continue to explore pro-environmental behaviors not in isolation, but as integrated within broader green lifestyle perceptions and contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Allcott, H. (2011). Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1082–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003
Ateş, H. (2020). Merging Theory of Planned Behavior and Value Identity Personal norm model to explain pro-environmental behaviors. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 24, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.006
Axon, S. (2017). “Keeping the ball rolling”: Addressing the enablers of, and barriers to, sustainable lifestyles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 52, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.05.002
Axsen, J., TyreeHageman, J., & Lentz, A. (2012). Lifestyle practices and pro-environmental technology. Ecological Economics, 82, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.013
Babbie, E. (2013). The basics of social research. Cengage learning.
Barr, S., Gilg, A. W., & Ford, N. (2005). The household energy gap: Examining the divide between habitual-and purchase-related conservation behaviours. Energy Policy, 33, 1425–1444
Blamey, R. (1998). The activation of environmental norms: Extending Schwartz’s model. Environment and Behavior, 30, 676–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000505
Boucher JL (2016) Culture, carbon, and climate change: A class analysis of climate change belief, lifestyle lock-in, and personal carbon footprint. SocEkol 25:53–80. https://doi.org/10.17234/SocEkol.25.1.3
Bukchin, S., & Kerret, D. (2020). Once you choose hope: Early adoption of green technology. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 3271–3280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07251-y
Carlsson-Kanyama, A., Lindén, A.-L., & Eriksson, B. (2005). Residential energy behaviour: Does generation matter? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29, 239–253
Csutora, M. (2012). One more awareness gap? The behaviour–impact gap problem. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35, 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-012-9187-8
de Groot JIM de, Thøgersen J (2018) Values and pro-environmental behaviour. In: Environmental Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp 167–178
Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (2003). Green and greenback: The behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society, 15, 441–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463103154002
Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R. (2005). Environmental values. Annu Rev Environ Resour, 30, 335–372. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144444
Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J., et al. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 18452–18456. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908738106
Dieu-Hang, T., Grafton, R. Q., Martínez-Espiñeira, R., & Garcia-Valiñas, M. (2017). Household adoption of energy and water-efficient appliances: An analysis of attitudes, labelling and complementary green behaviours in selected OECD countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 197, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.070
DiStefano C, Zhu M, Mîndrilã D (2009) Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation 14: https://doi.org/10.7275/DA8T-4G52
Dubois, G., Sovacool, B., Aall, C., et al. (2019). It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures. Energy Research & Social Science, 52, 144–158
Elf P, Gatersleben B, Christie I (2019) Facilitating positive spillover effects: New insights from a mixed-methods approach exploring factors enabling people to live more sustainable lifestyles. Front Psychol 9: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02699
Endres, A., & Rundshagen, B. (2010). Standard oriented environmental policy: Cost-effectiveness and incentives for ‘green technology.’ German Economic Review, 11, 86–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2009.00477.x
EPA. (2009). A resource of the national action plan for energy efficiency: Energy efficiency as a low-cost resource for achieving carbon emissions reductions. Environmental Protection Agency.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
Fisher, C., Bashyal, S., & Bachman, B. (2012). Demographic impacts on environmentally friendly purchase behaviors. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 20, 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2012.13
Gatersleben, B., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2002). Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34, 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034003004
Gillingham, K., Keyes, A., & Palmer, K. (2018). Advances in evaluating energy efficiency policies and programs. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 10, 511–532. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023028
Gillingham, K., Kotchen, M. J., Rapson, D. S., & Wagner, G. (2013). Energy policy: The rebound effect is overplayed. Nature, 493, 475–476. https://doi.org/10.1038/493475a
Girod, B., Stucki, T., & Woerter, M. (2017). How do policies for efficient energy use in the household sector induce energy-efficiency innovation? An evaluation of European countries. Energy Policy, 103, 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.054
Hall, B. H., & Helmers, C. (2013). Innovation and diffusion of clean/green technology: Can patent commons help? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66, 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.12.008
Hanson, C. B. (2013). Environmental concern, attitude toward green corporate practices, and green consumer behavior in the United States and Canada. ASBBS E-Journal, 9, 62
Harrison, K. (2007). The road not taken: Climate change policy in Canada and the United States. Global Environmental Politics, 7, 92–117. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2007.7.4.92
Herring, H. (2006). Energy efficiency—A critical view. Energy, 31, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.04.055
Hertwich, E. G., & Peters, G. P. (2009). Carbon footprint of nations: A global, trade-linked analysis. Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 6414–6420. https://doi.org/10.1021/es803496a
Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M (2008) Evaluating model fit: A synthesis of the structural equation modelling literature. In: 7th European Conference on research methodology for business and management studies. pp 195–200
Hua, L., & Wang, S. (2019). Antecedents of consumers’ intention to purchase energy-efficient appliances: An empirical study based on the technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Sustainability, 11, 2994. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102994
IEA (2015) World Energy Outlook Special Report. INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY
Ivanco M, Karney BW, Waher KJ (2007) To switch, or not to switch: A critical analysis of Canada’s ban on incandescent light bulbs. In: 2007 IEEE Canada Electrical Power Conference. pp 550–555
Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001
Karlin, B., Davis, N., Sanguinetti, A., et al. (2014). Dimensions of conservation: Exploring differences among energy behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 46, 423–452
Klöckner, C. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1028–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006155
Leth-Steensen, C., & Gallitto, E. (2016). Testing mediation in structural equation modeling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76, 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415593777
Lin, E., & Shi, Q. (2014). Exploring individual and school-related factors and environmental literacy: Comparing U.S. and Canada using PISA 2006. Int J of Sci and Math Educ, 12, 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9396-2
Liobikienė, G., Mandravickaitė, J., & Bernatonienė, J. (2016). Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU: A cross-cultural study. Ecological Economics, 125, 38–46
Longo, C., Shankar, A., & Nuttall, P. (2019). “It’s not easy living a sustainable lifestyle”: How greater knowledge leads to dilemmas, Tensions and Paralysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 154, 759–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3422-1
Lorenzen, J. A. (2012). Going green: The process of lifestyle change. Sociological Forum, 27, 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01303.x
Lubowiecki-Vikuk, A., Dąbrowska, A., & Machnik, A. (2021). Responsible consumer and lifestyle: Sustainability insights. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.08.007
Martiskainen M (2007) Affecting consumer behaviour on energy demand: Final report to EdF Energy March 2007. Sussex Energy Group SPRU - Science and Technology Policy Research University of Sussex
McCoy, D., & Lyons, S. (2017). Unintended outcomes of electricity smart-metering: Trading-off consumption and investment behaviour. Energy Efficiency, 10, 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9452-9
Moser AK (2015) Thinking green, buying green? Drivers of pro-environmental purchasing behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2014-1179
Nair, G., Gustavsson, L., & Mahapatra, K. (2010). Factors influencing energy efficiency investments in existing Swedish residential buildings. Energy Policy, 38, 2956–2963
Orea, L., Llorca, M., & Filippini, M. (2015). A new approach to measuring the rebound effect associated to energy efficiency improvements: An application to the US residential energy demand. Energy Economics, 49, 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.016
Peattie, K. (2010). Green consumption: Behavior and norms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 195–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-032609-094328
Pickett-Baker, J., & Ozaki, R. (2008). Pro-environmental products: Marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. Journal of Consumer Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760810890516
Ruderman, H., Levine, M. D., & McMahon, J. E. (1984). Energy efficiency choice in the purchase of residential appliances. Lawrence Berkeley Lab.
Saunders, H. D. (2013). Historical evidence for energy efficiency rebound in 30 US sectors and a toolkit for rebound analysts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 1317–1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.007
Schmitt, M. T., Aknin, L. B., Axsen, J., & Shwom, R. L. (2018). Unpacking the relationships between pro-environmental behavior, life satisfaction, and perceived ecological threat. Ecological Economics, 143, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.007
Schuitema, G., & de Groot, J. I. M. (2015). Green consumerism: The influence of product attributes and values on purchasing intentions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14, 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1501
Sekar, A., Williams, E., Hittinger, E., & Chen, R. (2019). How behavioral and geographic heterogeneity affects economic and environmental benefits of efficient appliances. Energy Policy, 125, 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.035
Shove E, Pantzar M, Watson M (2012) The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. SAGE.
Song, K., Qu, S., Taiebat, M., et al. (2019). Scale, distribution and variations of global greenhouse gas emissions driven by U.S. households. Environment International, 133, 105137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105137
Steg L, De Groot JI (2012) Environmental values. In: The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
Steger, M. A. E., Pierce, J. C., Steel, B. S., & Lovrich, N. P. (1989). Political culture, postmaterial values, and the new environmental paradigm: A comparative analysis of Canada and the United States. Political Behavior, 11, 233–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992298
Stern, P. C. (2000). New Environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Social Isssues, 56, 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., et al. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 17
Stern, P. C., Guagnano, G. A., & Dietz, T. (1998). A brief inventory of values. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 984–1001
Stragier J, Hauttekeete L, De Marez L (2010) Introducing smart grids in residential contexts: Consumers’ perception of smart household appliances. In: 2010 IEEE Conference on Innovative Technologies for an Efficient and Reliable Electricity Supply. pp 135–142
Subiza-Pérez, M., Santa Marina, L., Irizar, A., et al. (2020). Who feels a greater environmental risk? Women, younger adults and pro-environmentally friendly people express higher concerns about a set of environmental exposures. Environmental Research, 181, 108918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108918
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
US Energy Information Administration. (2018). What’s new in how we use energy at home: Results from EIA’s 2015 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS). U.S. Department of Energy.
US Energy Information Administration. (2015). Issues in international energy consumption analysis: Canadian Energy Demand. U.S.Department of Energy.
U.S. House Select Committee on Climate Crisis (2020) Solving the climate crisis: The congressional action plan for a clean energy economy and a healthy, resilient, and just America
van der Werff, E., & Steg, L. (2016). The psychology of participation and interest in smart energy systems: Comparing the value-belief-norm theory and the value-identity-personal norm model. Energy Research & Social Science, 22, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.022
van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013). The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.006
Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Moral norms and environmental behavior: An application of Schwartz’s norm-activation model to yard burning. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00775.x
Vazifehdoust, H., Taleghani, M., Esmaeilpour, F., & Nazari, K. (2013). Purchasing green to become greener: Factors influence consumers’ green purchasing behavior. Management Science Letters, 3, 2489–2500
Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003
Wiernik, B. M., Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2013). Age and environmental sustainability: A meta-analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28, 826–856. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-07-2013-0221
Wilson, J., Tyedmers, P., & Spinney, J. E. L. (2013). An exploration of the relationship between socioeconomic and well-being variables and household greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17, 880–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12057
World Bank (2020) World development indicators: CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita) - Canada, United States
Xiao, C., & Dunlap, R. E. (2007). Validating a comprehensive model of environmental concern cross-nationally: A U.S.-Canadian comparison*. Social Science Quarterly, 88, 471–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00467.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Berman Caggiano, H., Kumar, P., Shwom, R. et al. Explaining green technology purchases by US and Canadian households: the role of pro-environmental lifestyles, values, and environmental concern. Energy Efficiency 14, 46 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-021-09959-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-021-09959-8