Abstract
The article discusses the functioning of human-like consciousness and the potential for developing a chatbot based on human-like consciousness. The proposed approach was verified experimentally using a sociological method and by attracting a cohort of student volunteers. The chatbot population was created on the back of our complex neural network architecture design. The volunteers were asked to identify their interlocutor, which was either a human agent or a chatbot. For integrity, the conversations between bots and people were organized randomly so that each volunteer could interact several times with all bots in the population and with all participants in the sample. The article discusses the results of the study, the details of the proposed approach. The article explains the features of the functioning and self-reconfiguration of the neural network that provide high reliability of chatbot replicas and high speed of responses to replicas of human users so that the delay time does not raise suspicion of human users. The main idea of the authors’ approach is an attempt to model human self-awareness and self-reflection. The results prove the proposed neural network architecture design successful in terms of real-time self-learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
16 August 2023
This article has been retracted. Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-023-00873-9
References
Silver D, Huang A, Maddison CJ et al (2016) Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 529(7587):484. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16961
Boden MA (2014) 4 GOFAI. The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence, pp 89
Metzinger T (2004) Being no one: The self-model theory of subjectivity. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 714
Anderson JR (2013) The architecture of cognition. Psychology Press, London
Smolensky P (1988) On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behav Brain Sci 11(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00052432
Spector JM (2015) Foundations of educational technology: integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspectives. Routledge, Abingdon, p 254. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315764269
Kara A, Dogan I (2018) Reinforcement learning approaches for specifying ordering policies of perishable inventory systems. Expert Syst Appl 91:150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.08.046
Will Knight (2016) 10 breakthrough technologies 2016: conversational interfaces. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/600766/10-breakthrough-technologies2016-conversational-interfaces. Accessed 7 Nov 2019
Dale R (2016) The return of the chatbots. Nat Lang Eng 22(5):811–817. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324916000243
Lavazza A, Manzotti R (2013) An externalist approach to creativity: discovery versus recombination. Mind Soc 12(1):61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-013-0124-6
Edelman S (2015) Varieties of perceptual truth and their possible evolutionary roots. Psychon Bull Rev 22(6):1519–1522. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0741-z
Graesser AC, Foltz PW, Rosen Y et al (2018) Challenges of assessing collaborative problem solving. In: Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Springer, Cham, pp 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_5
Ericsson KA, Kintsch W (1995) Long-term working memory. Psychol Rev 102(2):211. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211
Franklin S (2003) An autonomous software agent for navy personnel work: a case study. In: Human interaction with autonomous systems in complex environments: papers from 2003 AAAI spring symposium, AAAI, Palo Alto, pp 60–65
Baars BJ, Franklin S (2003) How conscious experience and working memory interact. Trends Cognit Sci 7(4):166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00056-1
Halgren E, Kaestner E, Marinkovic K et al (2015) Laminar profile of spontaneous and evoked theta: rhythmic modulation of cortical processing during word integration. Neuropsychologia 76:108–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.021
Chang X, Yu YL, Yang Y et al (2016) Semantic pooling for complex event analysis in untrimmed videos. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 39(8):1617–1632
Chang X, Ma Z, Lin M et al (2017) Feature interaction augmented sparse learning for fast kinect motion detection. IEEE Trans Image Process 26(8):3911–3920
Searle JR (1980) Minds, brains, and programs. Behav Brain Sci 3(3):417–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756
Manzotti R, Chella A (2018) Good old-fashioned artificial consciousness and the intermediate level fallacy. Front Robot AI 5:39. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00039
Chalmers DJ (1996) The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Levy D (2009) The ethical treatment of artificially conscious robots. Int J Soc Robot 1(3):209–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0022-6
Chatila R, Renaudo E, Andries M et al (2018) Toward self-aware robots. Front Robot AI Front Media SA 5:88
Kinouchi Y, Mackin KJ (2018) A basic architecture of an autonomous adaptive system with conscious-like function for a humanoid robot. Front Robot AI 5:30. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00030
Zalta E (2006) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy: a university/library partnership in support of scholarly communication and open access. Coll Res Libr News 67(8):502–504
Farrell J, McClelland T (2017) Consciousness and inner awareness. Rev Philos Psychol 8(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0331-x
Block N (1995) On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behav Brain Sci 18(2):227–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00038188
Dehaene S, Lau H, Kouider S (2017) What is consciousness, and could machines have it? Science 358(6362):486–492. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8871
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article has been retracted. Please see the retraction notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-023-00873-9
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shestak, V., Gura, D., Khudyakova, N. et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Chatbot design issues: building intelligence with the Cartesian paradigm. Evol. Intel. 15, 2351–2359 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-020-00358-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-020-00358-z