Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neonatal surgery : A ten year audit from a university hospital

  • Symposium on Pediatric Surgery - II
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neonatal surgery is the flagship and most challenging component of pediatric surgery, which is the youngest subspeciality of surgery. Neonatal surgery carried a survival rate of only 30% three decades ago. In the last decade there has been a significant change in the scenario. Earlier recognition and referral of these anomalies, availability of neonatal intensive care, better preoperative planning, decision, and techniques have lead to the change in the management. This is an audit into the outcome of neonatal surgery from one of the largest units in India over a ten year period. This audit reveals an across the board survival of 65–70% newborns after surgery on nearly two thousand case over a ten year period. It has an important message that while pediatric surgery units expand, risk stratification of surgical newborns and their treatment in suitable units is mandatory to maintain and improve these figures to match international standards over the next decade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kulshreshtha R, Nath LM, Upadhyay P. Congenital malformations in live born infants in a rural community. Indian Pediatr 1983; 20: 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gangopadhyay AN, Gopal SC, Sharma S, Gupta DK, Sharma SP, Mohan TV. Management of anorectal malformations in Varanasi, India: a long-term review of single and three stage procedures. Pediatr Surg Int 2006; 22: 169–172.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gangopadhyay AN, Shilpa S, Mohan TV, Gopal SC. Singlestage management of all pouch colon (anorectal malformation) in newborns. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40: 1151–1155.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu G, Yuan J, Geng J, Wang C, Li T. The treatment of high and intermediate anorectal malformations: one stage or three procedures? J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39: 1466–1465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sherman JO, Snyder ME, Weitzman JJ et al. A 40-year multinational retrospective study of 880 Swenson procedures. J Pediatr Surg 1989; 24: 833.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Murphy FL, Sparnon AL. Long-term complications following intestinal malrotation and the Ladd’s procedure: a 15 year review. Pediatr Surg Int 2006; 22: 326–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen EA, Luks FI, Gilchrist BF et al. Pyloric stenosis in the age of ultrasonography: fading skills, better patients? J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31: 829.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maksoud-Filho JG, Tannuri U, da Silva MM, Maksoud JG. The outcome of newborns with abdominal wall defects according to the method of abdominal closure: the experience of a single center. Pediatr Surg Int 2006; 22: 503–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wakhlu AK, Wakhlu AK. The management of exomphalos. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35: 73–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma AK, Shekhawat NS, Agrawal LD, Chaturvedi V, Kothari SK, Goel D. Esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: a review of 25 years’ experience. Pediatr Surg Int 2000; 16: 478–482.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bhatnagar V, Agarwala S, Bajpai M, Gupta DK, Mitra DK. Results of treatment of esophageal atresia. JIAPS 1997; 2: 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jain A, Singh V, Sharma M. Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Our Experience-A Brief Review. Indian J Anaesth 2002; 46: 426–429.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raghvendran M et al. Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Clinical study. J Ind Asso Paediatr Surge 1999; 138: 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ierullo AM, Ganapathy R, Crowley S, Craxford L, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. Neonatal outcome of antenatally diagnosed congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations. Ultrasound Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005; 26: 150–153.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Acharya R, Ramachandran CS, Singh S. Laparoscopic management of abdominal complications in ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. J Lap Surg Tech 2001; 11: 167–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Piatt JH Jr, Garton HJ. Clinical diagnosis of ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure among children with hydrocephalus. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008; 24: 201–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar R, Singhal N. Outcome of Meningomyelocele/Lipomeningomyelocele in Children of Northern India Pediatric Neurosurgery 2007; 43: 7–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarhan O, Zaccaria I, Macher MA, Muller F, Vuillard E, Delezoide AL et al. Long-term outcome of prenatally detected posterior urethral valves: single center study of 65 cases managed by primary valve ablation. J Urol 2008; 179: 307–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mukhopadhyay B, Sen S, AJ D’cruz MK Abraham, SI Ghosh, Mitra, SK Posterior Urethral Valves-A Multi Center Review. J Asso Pediatr Surg India 2003; 8: 140–143.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chowdhary SK, Walter S, Bhagat A et al. Antenatal diagnosis of hydronephrosis-outcome with a conservative approach Indian Pediatrics 2001; 38: 1401–1404.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A.N. Gangopadhyay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gangopadhyay, A., Upadhyaya, V.D. & Sharma, S. Neonatal surgery : A ten year audit from a university hospital. Indian J Pediatr 75, 1025–1030 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-008-0205-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-008-0205-4

Key words

Navigation