Skip to main content
Log in

Social Contagion in Bullying: an Examination of Strains and Types of Bullying Victimization in Peer Networks

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined risk and protective factors for four types of bullying victimization – physical, verbal, relational, and cyber bullying – while assessing the influence of vicarious, anticipated, and experienced strains from General Strain Theory. In this study, experienced strain was operationalized as exposure to negative stimuli, such as rejection. Vicarious strain was operationalized as witnessing or being aware of other people’s negative experiences, such as peer victimization, and anticipated strain occurred when an individual had negative expectations about the future, such as a fear of harm. Using a sample of Southeastern high school students, this study found that individuals who experienced vicarious strain (peer victimization) had a higher likelihood of experiencing the same type of victimization as their peers. Previous bullies were also likely to experience the same type of bullying that they initiated. Anticipated strain (fear of attack) was associated with an increased likelihood of experiencing verbal and cyber bullying. Adult support was associated with an increased likelihood of verbal bullying but decreased likelihood of relational bullying victimization. Peer support was associated with an increased likelihood of experiencing relational and cyber bullying victimization. The results support Agnew’s (2006) proposal that experienced, vicarious, and anticipated strains are correlated with antisocial behavior and victimization (Zavala & Spohn, 2013). Policy implications and directions for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, R. (2002). Experienced, vicarious, and anticipated strain: An exploratory study on physical victimization and delinquency. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 603–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general theory of crime. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, R., Brezina, T., Wright, J. P., & Cullen, F. T. (2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40(1), 43–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, A., Correia, I., & Marinho, S. (2009). Moral disengagement, normative beliefs of peer group, and attitudes regarding roles in bullying. Journal of School Violence, 9(1), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, S. W. (2009). Street youths' violent responses to violent personal, vicarious, and anticipated strain. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(5), 442–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, M., Kriger, N., & Miró, R. (2018). School safety policies and programs administered by the US Federal Government: 1990-2016. Award number 2015-CKR-4949.

  • Brown, R. P., Osterman, L. L., & Barnes, C. D. (2009). School violence and the culture of honor. Psychological Science, 20(11), 1400–1405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63(3), 452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79(5), 1185–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T., Unnever, J. D., Hartman, J. L., Turner, M. G., & Agnew, R. (2008). Gender, bullying victimization, and juvenile delinquency: A test of general strain theory. Victims and Offenders, 3(4), 346–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruyn, E. H., & Cillessen, A. H. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: Prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21(6), 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCamp, W., & Newby, B. (2015). From bullied to deviant: The victim–offender overlap among bullying victims. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 13(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, C. E., & Lochman, J. E. (2019). Correcting for norm misperception of anti-bullying attitudes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 0165025419860598.

  • Downes, P., & Cefai, C. (2019). Strategic clarity on different prevention levels of school bullying and violence: Rethinking peer defenders and selected prevention. Journal of School Violence, 1-12.

  • Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2011). Bullying as a predictor of offending, violence and later life outcomes. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21(2), 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, K. S., Pearson, C. R., & Cohen, D. (2015). Revenge is seductive, if not sweet: Why friends matter for prevention efforts. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glassner, S. D., & Cho, S. (2018). Bullying victimization, negative emotions, and substance use: Utilizing general strain theory to examine the undesirable outcomes of childhood bullying victimization in adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Youth Studies, 1–18.

  • Hay, C., & Evans, M. M. (2006). Violent victimization and involvement in delinquency: Examining predictions from general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(3), 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, G. E., Piquero, N. L., & Piquero, A. R. (2011). General strain theory, peer rejection, and delinquency/crime. Youth & Society, 43(4), 1272–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 129–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, W. G., Piquero, A. R., & Reingle, J. M. (2012). On the overlap between victimization and offending: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kort-Butler, L. A. (2010). Experienced and vicarious victimization: Do social support and self-esteem prevent delinquent responses? Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 496–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., & Kim, J. (2018). Examining the gendered effect of experienced and vicarious victimization: A general strain theory perspective. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(2), 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W. H., Cochran, J. K., & Mieczkowski, T. (2011). Direct and vicarious violent victimization and juvenile delinquency: An application of general strain theory. Sociological Inquiry, 81(2), 195–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manasse, M. E., & Ganem, N. M. (2009). Victimization as a cause of delinquency: The role of depression and gender. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 371–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcum, C. D., Higgins, G. E., Freiburger, T. L., & Ricketts, M. L. (2014). Exploration of the cyberbullying victim/offender overlap by sex. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(3), 538–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Linking exposure to strain with anger: An investigation of deviant adaptations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26(3), 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehari, K. R., & Farrell, A. D. (2018). Where does cyberbullying fit? A comparison of competing models of adolescent aggression. Psychology of Violence, 8(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menesini, E., Codecasa, E., Benelli, B., & Cowie, H. (2003). Enhancing children's responsibility to take action against bullying: Evaluation of a befriending intervention in Italian middle schools. Aggressive Behavior, 29(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.80012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(5), 602–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, J. N., & Jasinski, J. L. (2012). Going cyber: Using routine activities theory to predict cyberbullying experiences. Sociological Spectrum, 32(1), 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niche.com. Explore Schools, Companies, and Neighborhoods. (2020). Retrieved August 25, 2020, from https://www.niche.com/.

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the south. Hachette UK.

  • Orpinas, P., McNicholas, C., & Nahapetyan, L. (2015). Gender differences in trajectories of relational aggression perpetration and victimization from middle to high school. Aggressive Behavior, 41, 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paez, G. R. (2018). Cyberbullying among adolescents: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of School Violence, 17(1), 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2016). Bullying today: Bullet points and best practices. Corwin Press.

  • Rodkin, P. C., Espelage, D. L., & Hanish, L. D. (2015). A relational framework for understanding bullying: Developmental antecedents and outcomes. American Psychologist, 70(4), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, S., Turner, S., Taillieu, T., Fortier, J., & Afifi, T. O. (2018). Bullying victimization experiences among middle and high school adolescents: Traditional bullying, discriminatory harassment, and cybervictimization. Journal of Adolescence, 63, 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. K., O'Donnell, L., Stueve, A., & Coulter, R. W. (2012). Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students. American Journal of Public Health, 102(1), 171–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, R. (2002). Odd girl out: The hidden culture of aggression in girls. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs-Richardson, M., Sinclair, H. C., Goldberg, R. M., Ellithorpe, C. N., & Amadi, S. C. (2018). Reaching out versus lashing out: Examining gender differences in experiences with and responses to bullying in high school. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(1), 39–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2012). Bullying prevention programs: The importance of peer intervention, disciplinary methods and age variations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8(4), 443–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turanovic, J. J., & Pratt, T. C. (2013). The consequences of maladaptive coping: Integrating general strain and self-control theories to specify a causal pathway between victimization and offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29(3), 321–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitoroulis, I., & Vaillancourt, T. (2015). Meta-analytic results of ethnic group differences in peer victimization. Aggressive Behavior, 41(2), 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivolo, A. M., Holt, M. K., & Massetti, G. M. (2011). Individual and contextual factors for bullying and peer victimization: Implications for prevention. Journal of School Violence, 10(2), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waasdorp, T. E., Pas, E. T., O'Brennan, L. M., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2011). A multilevel perspective on the climate of bullying: Discrepancies among students, school staff, and parents. Journal of School Violence, 10(2), 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J., & Nansel, T. R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(4), 368–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolke, D., Copeland, W. E., Angold, A., & Costello, E. J. (2013). Impact of bullying in childhood on adult health, wealth, crime, and social outcomes. Psychological Science, 24(10), 1958–1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, S. L., & Joo, H. J. (2011). Predictors of school victimization: Individual, familial, and school factors. Crime & Delinquency, 57(3), 458–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavala, E., & Spohn, R. E. (2013). The role of vicarious and anticipated strain on the overlap of violent perpetration and victimization: A test of general strain theory. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(1), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, A., Musu-Gillette, L., & Oudekerk, B. A. (2016). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2015. Retrieved from: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016079.pdf

Download references

Availability of Data and Material

Data is available via the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Justice under Grant number 2015-CK-BX-0004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan Stubbs-Richardson.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

Not Applicable.

Code Availability

Not Applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

SURVEY INSTRUMENT

We are interested in how students get along with one another. Please think about your relationship with other STUDENTS AT YOUR SCHOOL DURING THE PAST SIX MONTHS. For each of the statements, please answer questions using the scale provided.

PA Some students engage in physical aggression, such as hitting, kicking, and shoving other students. Physical aggression may also include any other attempts that have the potential to cause physical harm to another person. (PA = Physical Aggression).

VA Some students engage in verbal aggression, such as calling others names to hurt feelings, making fun of others to cause harm, or making threats of harm. Verbal aggression may also include any other attempts to cause psychological harm. (VA = Verbal Aggression).

SA Some students engage in social aggression, such as spreading rumors about other students, purposely leaving people out of social groups or social events, turning people against each other, or giving the silent treatment. Social aggression may also include any other attempts to cause social harm.(SA = Social or Relational Aggression).

CA Some students engage in cyber aggression, such as posting negative things about others online or posting/sharing inappropriate pictures by electronic means (e.g., by use of cell phones, social media, social applications, or internet access). Cyber aggression may also include any other attempts to cause harm by electronic means. (CA = Cyber Aggression).

(Note: Items are shown for one type of aggression at a time.)

CSB01 How often do you do this? _____ (Bullying Perpetration).

CSB02 How often has this happened to you? (Bullying Victimization)_____.

CSB04.PA How often has this happened to a friend of yours (Vicarious Strain).

0

1

2

3

4

5

Never

Once

Rarely

Sometimes

Almost all of the time

All of the Time

Note: If the response is rarely or more (response answer 2), pop up with: “Please recall the most recent, serious incident when answering the remainder of the questions”

NATIONAL CRIME VICTIMIZATION SURVEY (NCVS) – this was asked at the end of the survey along with demographics.

NCVS_1 How often are you afraid that someone will attack or harm you in the school building or on school property? (Anticipated Strain).

NCVS_2 How often are you afraid that someone will attack or harm you on a school bus or on the way to and from school? (Anticipated Strain).

Frequency Scale.

1

2

3

4

5

Never

Almost Never

Sometimes

Almost all of the time

All of the Time

SOCIAL ALIENATION SCALE (Jessor & Jessor, 1977; Experienced Strain) – this was asked at the end of the survey along with demographics.

0

1

2

3

4

Not at all

   

Definitely

To what extent did your experiences with your peers make you feel/think any of the following:

SAS1 I often feel left out of things that others are doing.

SAS2 You can’t count on other people when you have problems or need help.

SAS3 Most people don’t seem to accept me when I’m just being myself.

SAS4 Hardly anyone I know is interested in how I really feel inside.

SAS5 It’s hard to know how to act most of the time since you can’t tell what others expect.

SAS6 I often feel alone when I am with other people.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stubbs-Richardson, M., May, D.C. Social Contagion in Bullying: an Examination of Strains and Types of Bullying Victimization in Peer Networks. Am J Crim Just 46, 748–769 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09572-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09572-y

Keywords

Navigation