Abstract
Across a wide variety of cultural settings, kin have been shown to play an important role in promoting women’s reproductive success. Patrilocal postmarital residence is a potential hindrance to maintaining these support networks, raising the question: how do women preserve and foster relationships with their natal kin when propinquity is disrupted? Using census and interview data from the Himba, a group of semi-nomadic African pastoralists, I first show that although women have reduced kin propinquity after marriage, more than half of married women are visiting with their kin at a given time. Mobility recall data further show that married women travel more than unmarried women, and that women consistently return to stay with kin around the time of giving birth. Divorce and death of a spouse also trigger a return to living with kin, leading to a cumulative pattern of kin coresidence across the lifespan. These data suggest that patrilocality may be less of a constraint on female kin support than has been previously assumed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvarez, H. P. (2004). Residence groups among hunter-gatherers: a view of the claims and evidence for patrilocal bands. In B. Chapais & C. M. Berman (Eds.), Kinship and behavior in primates (pp. 420–442). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blurton Jones, N. G., Hawkes, K., & O’Connell, J. F. (2005). Hadza grandmothers as helpers: Residence data. In E. Voland, A. Chasiotis, & W. Schiefenhoevel (Eds.), Grandmotherhood: The evolutionary significance of the second half of female life (pp. 160–176). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Bollig, M. (2006). Risk management in a hazardous environment: A comparative study of two pastoral societies. New York: Springer.
Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1988). Kipsigis bridewealth payments. In L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, & P. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behaviour: A Darwinian perspective (pp. 65–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Borgerhoff Mulder, M., & Milton, M. (1985). Factors affecting infant care in the Kipsigis. Journal of Anthropological Research, 41, 231–262.
Borgerhoff Mulder, M., George-Cramer, M., Eshelman, J., & Ortolani, A. (2001). A study of East African kinship and marriage using a phlogenetically based comparative method. American Anthropologist, 103, 1059–1082.
Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Fazzio, I., Irons, W., McElreath, R., Bowles, S., Bell, A., et al. (2010). Pastoralism and wealth inequality. Current Anthropology, 51, 35–48.
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346–361.
Dugatkin, L. A. (1997). Cooperation among animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ember, M., & Ember, C. (1971). The conditions favoring matrilocal versus patrilocal residence. American Anthropologist, 73, 571–594.
Emlen, S. T. (1991). The evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (pp. 301–337). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
Flinn, M. V. (1988). Mate guarding in a Caribbean village. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 1–28.
Fricke, T., Axinn, W. G., & Thornton, A. (1993). Marriage, social inequality, and women’s contact with their natal families in alliance societies: two Tamang examples. American Anthropologist, 95, 395–419.
Gibson, G. (1956). Double descent and its correlates among the Herero of Ngamiland. American Anthropologist, 58, 109–139.
Gibson, G. D. (1977). Himba epochs. History in Africa, 4, 67–121.
Gibson, M. A., & Mace, R. (2005). Helpful grandmothers in rural Ethiopia: a study of the effect of kin on child survival and growth. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 469–482.
Griffin, A. S., & West, S. A. (2003). Kin discrimination and the benefit of helping in cooperatively breeding vertebrates. Science, 302, 634–636.
Harrell, S. (1997). Human families. Boulder: Westview Press.
Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., & Blurton Jones, N. G. (1997). Hadza women’s time allocation, offspring provisioning and the evolution of long postmenopausal life spans. Current Anthropology, 38, 551–577.
Hill, K. R., Walker, R. S., et al. (2011). Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure. Science, 331, 1286–1289.
Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hurtado, A. M., Hawkes, K., Hill, K., & Kaplan, H. (1985). Female subsistence strategies among Ache hunter-gatherers of eastern Paraguay. Human Ecology, 13, 1–28.
Judd, E. R. (1989). Niangjia: Chinese women and their natal families. Journal of Asian Studies, 48, 525–544.
Kaberry, P. M. (2003). Aboriginal woman: Sacred and profane. London: Routledge (Originally published in 1939).
Kramer, K. L. (2005). Children’s help and the pace of reproduction: cooperative breeding in humans. Evolutionary Anthropology, 14, 224–237.
Kramer, K. L. (2010). Cooperative breeding and its significance to the demographic success of humans. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 417–436.
Lamphere, L. (1974). Strategies, cooperation, and conflict among women in domestic groups. In M. Z. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.), Woman, culture and society (pp. 97–112). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lee, R. B. (1962). !Kung spatial organization: an ecological and historical perspective. Human Ecology, 1, 125–147.
Lee, R. B., & DeVore, I. (Eds.). (1968). Man the hunter. Chicago: Aldine.
Leslie, P. W., Campbell, K. L., Campbell, B. C., Kigondu, C. S., & Kirumbi, L. W. (1999). Fecundity and fertility. In M. A. Little & P. W. Leslie (Eds.), Turkana herders of the dry savanna: Ecology and biobehavioral response of nomads to an uncertain environment (pp. 248–278). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mace, R., & Sear, R. (2005). Are humans cooperative breeders? In E. Voland, A. Chasiotis, & W. Schiefenhoevel (Eds.), Grandmotherhood: The evolutionary significance of the second half of female life (pp. 143–159). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Malan, J. S. (1973). Double descent among the Himba of South West Africa. Cimbabasia (B), 2, 81–112.
Malan, J. S. (1995). Peoples of Namibia. Pretoria: Rhino Press.
Marlowe, F. W. (2000). Paternal investment and the human mating system. Behavioural Processes, 51, 45–61.
Marlowe, F. (2003). A critical period for provisioning by Hadza men: implications for pair bonding. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 217–229.
Marlowe, F. W. (2004). Marital residence among foragers. Current Anthropology, 45, 277–283.
Panter-Brick, C. (1989). Motherhood and subsistence work: the Tamang of rural Nepal. Human Ecology, 17, 205–228.
Pearson, W., & Hendrix, L. (1979). Divorce and the status of women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 375–385.
Picciano, M. F. (2003). Pregnancy and lactation: physiological adjustments, nutritional requirements and the role of dietary supplements. Journal of Nutrition, 133, 19975–20025.
Scelza, B. A. (2011). Female choice and extra-pair paternity in a traditional human population. Biology Letters. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0478.
Scelza, B. A., & Bliege Bird, R. (2008). Group structure and female cooperative networks in Australia’s Western Desert. Human Nature, 19, 231–248.
Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 1–18.
Turke, P. W. (1988). Helpers at the nest: Childcare networks on Ifaluk. In L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, & P. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behaviour: A Darwinian perspective (pp. 173–188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Voland, E., & Beise, J. (2005). “The husband’s mother is the devil in the house”: Data on the impact of the mother-in-law on stillbirth mortality in historical Krummhorn (1750–1874) and some thoughts on the evolution of postgenerative female life. In E. Voland, A. Chasiotis, & W. Schiefenhoevel (Eds.), Grandmotherhood: The evolutionary significance of the second half of female life (pp. 239–255). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Wood, B., & Marlowe, F. W. (2011). Dynamics of postmarital residence among the Hadza: a kin selection model. Human Nature, 22, 128–138.
Acknowledgments
This work has been generously funded by the UCLA Center for the Study of Women, and a UCLA Faculty Research Grant. Drafts of the manuscript were greatly improved by comments and discussions with Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Steve Josephson and three reviewers. My research assistant Kemuu Jakurama was indispensable and a great friend in the field. Finally, this work could not have been completed without the cooperation, friendship, and patience of the Himba families living in the Omuhonga Basin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scelza, B.A. Female Mobility and Postmarital Kin Access in a Patrilocal Society. Hum Nat 22, 377–393 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-011-9125-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-011-9125-5