Abstract
Artificial intelligence has often been seen as an attempt to reduce the natural mind to informational processes and, consequently, to naturalize philosophy. The many criticisms that were addressed to the so-called “old-fashioned AI” do not concern this attempt itself, but the methods it used, especially the reduction of the mind to a symbolic level of abstraction, which has often appeared to be inadequate to capture the richness of our mental activity. As a consequence, there were many efforts to evacuate the semantical models in favor of elementary physiological mechanisms simulated by information processes. However, these views, and the subsequent criticisms against artificial intelligence that they contain, miss the very nature of artificial intelligence, which is not reducible to a “science of the nature”, but which directly impacts our culture. More precisely, they lead to evacuate the role of the semantic information. In other words, they tend to throw the baby out with the bath-water. This paper tries to revisit the epistemology of artificial intelligence in the light of the opposition between the “sciences of nature” and the “sciences of culture”, which has been introduced by German neo-Kantian philosophers. It then shows how this epistemological view opens on the many contemporary applications of artificial intelligence that have already transformed—and will continue to transform—all our cultural activities and our world. Lastly, it places those perspectives in the context of the philosophy of information and more particularly it emphasizes the role played by the notions of context and level of abstraction in artificial intelligence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American Magazine, 34–43.
Bourdaillet, J., Ganascia, J.-G., & Fénoglio, I. (2007). Machine assisted study of writers’ rewriting processes. In Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on natural language processing and cognitive science (NLPCS).
Brooks, R. (2002). Flesh and machines: How robots will change us. Pantheon Books.
Cassirer, E. (1923). Substance and function. Chicago: Open Court.
Cassirer, E. (1961). The logic of the humanities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Chaitin, G. (2006). Epistemology as information theory. COLLAPSE, 1, 27–51.
Clancey, W. (1993). The knowledge level reinterpreted. In K. M. Ford, & J. M. Bradshaw (Eds.), Knowledge acquisition as modeling. Wiley.
Dodig-Crnkovic, G. (2007). Epistemology naturalized: The info-computationalist approach. American Philosophy Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers, 6(2), 9–14.
Dörner, D. (1997). The logic Of failure: Recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. A Merloyd Lawrence book. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
Floridi, L. (2008). Artificial intelligence—new frontier: Artificial companions and the fourth revolution. Metaphilosophy, 39(4/5), 651–655.
Floridi, L. (2010). The philosophy of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ganascia, J.-G. (2007). Modeling ethical rules of lying with answer set programming. Ethics and Information Technology, 9, 39–47.
Ganascia, J.-G. (2008). In silico’ experiments : Towards a computerized epistemology. Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers, American Philosophical Association Newsletters, 7(2), 11–15.
Ganascia, J.-G., & Debru, C. (2007). Cybernard: A computational reconstruction of Claude Bernards scientific discoveries. In Studies in computational intelligence (SCI) (pp. 497–510). Springer.
Gruber, T. (2004). Every ontology is a treat. AIS SIGSEMIS Bulletin, 1(3), 1–5. Tom Gruber interview. http://tomgruber.org/writing/sigsemis-2004.pdf.
Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (1995). Experts in organizations: A knowledge-based perspective on organizational change. Berlin, New-York: Walter de Gruyter.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hutter, M. (2005). Universal artificial intelligence: Sequential decisions based on algorithmic probabilities. Springer.
Knoblock, C., Ambite, J., Carman, M., Michelson, M., Szekely, P., & Tuchinda, R. (2008). Beyond the elves: Making intelligent agents intelligent. AI Magazine, 29(2), 33–39.
Manzotti, R. (2007). Towards artificial consciousness. American Philosophy Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers, 7(1), 12–15.
McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. (1955). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. Technical report, Dartmouth College.
Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Moravec, H. (1988). Mind children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nelson, T. (1965). A file structure for the complex, the changing and indeterminate. In Proceedings of association for computing machinery 20th national conference (pp. 84–100).
Newell, A. (1980). Physical symbol systems. Cognitive Science, 4, 135–183.
Newell, A. (1982). The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 18, 87–127.
Nobel, D. (2006). The music of life: Biology beyond the genome. Oxford University Press.
Quillian, M. R. (1968). Semantic memory. In M. Minsky (Ed.), Semantic information processing (pp. 227–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ramalho, G., Rolland, P.-Y., & Ganascia, J.-G. (1999). An artificially intelligent jazz performer. Journal of New Music Research, 28(2), 105–129.
Rickert, H. (1921). In P. Siebeck (Ed.), Kulturwissenschaft und naturwissenschaft (5th ed.). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
Rolland, P.-Y., & Ganascia, J.-G. (1999). Musical pattern extraction and similarity assessment. In Readings in music and artificial intelligence. contemporary music studies (Vol. 20). Harwood Academic Publishers.
Rolland, P.-Y., & Ganascia, J.-G. (2002). Pattern detection and discovery: The case of music data mining. In Pattern detection and discovery (pp. 190–198). Springer.
Shapiro, D., & Goker, M. (2008). Advancing ai research and applications by learning from what went wrong and why. AI Magazine, 29(2), 9–76.
Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Velcin, J., & Ganascia, J.-G. (2005). Stereotype extraction with default clustering. In Proceedings of the 19th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI) (pp. 883–888).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ganascia, JG. Epistemology of AI Revisited in the Light of the Philosophy of Information. Know Techn Pol 23, 57–73 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-010-9101-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-010-9101-0