Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of Failing to Give an Apology and the Need-for-Cognition on Anger

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined how failing to give an apology would affect the anger of persons high and low in the need-for-cognition. We hypothesized that failing to apologize when there was an opportunity would lead to more anger than a no communication control condition, and that apologizing would lead to less anger than the control condition. Further, we hypothesized that these effects would be particularly strong in participants with a low need-for-cognition. To test these hypotheses 60 participants were put in an anger inducing situation and randomly assigned to one of three conditions: apology, no apology (fail to apologize), and control condition where there was no opportunity for an apology. As predicted, failure to apologize was associated with more anger than the control condition. With participants low in the need-for-cognition, the failure to apologize resulted in more anger than either the no communication control or the apology condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. C., Linden, W., & Habra, M. E. (2006). Influence of apologies and trait hostility on recovery from anger. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 347–358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (1990). Countering the effects of destructive criticism: the relative efficacy of four interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M., & Earwaker, D. (1994). Victims’ responses to apologies: the effects of offender responsibility and offense severity. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 457–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, B. G. W. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: the life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby, B. W., & Schlenker, B. R. (1982). Children’s reactions to apologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 742–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, K., & Schlenker, B. (1991). Self-consciousness and strategic self-presentation. Journal of Personality, 59, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, T. J., & Rule, B. G. (1983). An attributional perspective on anger and aggression. In R. G. Geen & E. I. Donnerstein (Eds.) Aggression: Theoretical and empirical reviews, vol. 1 (pp. 41–74). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, G. J. O., Danilovics, P., Fernandez, G., Peterson, D., & Reeder, G. D. (1986). Attributional complexity: an individual differences measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 875–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frantz, C. M., & Bennigson, C. (2005). Better late than early: the influence of timing on apology effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 201–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18, 213–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., et al. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T., & Rule, B. (1986). Mitigating circumstance information, censure, and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 537–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kallgren, C. A., Reno, R. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: when norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardash, C. M., & Noel, L. K. (2000). How organizational signals, need for cognition, and verbal ability affect text recall and recognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 317–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazare, A. (2006). Apology in medical practice: an emerging clinical skill. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 1401–1404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May, L. N., & Jones, W. H. (2007). Does hurt linger? Exploring the Nature of hurt feelings over time. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 25, 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M., Rachal, K., Steven, J., Worthington, E., Brown, S., & Hight, T. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships II: theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527–553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C. E. (1989). Effects of apology on marital and family relationships. Family Therapy, 16, 283–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohbuchi, K., & Sato, K. (1994). Children’s reactions to mitigating accounts: apologies, excuses, and intentionality of harm. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M., & Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 219–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohbuchi, K., Tamura, T., Quigley, B. M., Tedeschi, J. T., Madi, N., Bond, M. H., et al. (2004). Anger, blame, and dimensions of perceived norm violation: culture, gender, and relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1587–1603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, J., & Meyer, R. (1999). An attributional analysis of jurors’ judgments in a criminal case: a preliminary investigation. Social Behavior and Personality, 27, 563–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quattrone, G. A. (1982). Overattribution and unit formation: when behavior engulfs the person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 593–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, M. (2004). Less thought, more punishment: need for cognition predicts support for punitive responses to crime. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1485–1492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Forster, N., & Montada, L. (2004). Effects of objective and subjective account components on forgiving. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 465–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R., & Gee, J. (2004). When social accounts backfire: the exacerbating effects of a polite message or an apology on reactions to an unfair account. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 322–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto, N. (1998). Norms of apology depicted in U.S. American and Japanese literature on manners and etiquette. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takuku, S. (2001). The effects of apology and perspective taking on interpersonal forgiveness. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 494–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitesell, N., & Harter, S. (1996). The interpersonal context of emotion: anger with close friends and classmates. Child Development, 67, 1345–1359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ybarra, O., & Trafimow, D. (1998). How priming the private self or collective self affects the relative weights of attitudes and subjective norms. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 362–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murray G. Millar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, R.L., Millar, M.G. The Impact of Failing to Give an Apology and the Need-for-Cognition on Anger. Curr Psychol 27, 126–134 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-008-9025-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-008-9025-y

Keywords

Navigation