Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Evaluation of Infiltration Models

  • Water Resources and Hydrologic Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Infiltration models are very helpful in designing and evaluating surface irrigation systems. The main purpose of this study is to compare infiltration models which are used to evaluate infiltration rates of Davood Rashid, Kelat and Honam in Iran. Field infiltration tests were carried out at sixteen different locations comprising of 155 observations by use of double ring infiltrometer. The potential of four conventional infiltration models (Kostiakov, Modified Kostiakov, Novel and Philip’s models) were evaluated by least–square fitting to observed infiltration data. Three statistical comparison criteria including coefficient of correlation (C.C), coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) were used to determine the best performing infiltration models. The novel infiltration model suggests improved performance out of other three models. Further a Multi-linear Regression (MLR) equation has been developed using field infiltration data and compare with Support Vector Machine and Gaussian Process based regression with two kernels (Pearson VII and radial basis) modeling. Results suggest that Pearson VII based SVM works well than other modeling approaches in estimating the infiltration rate of soils. Sensitivity analysis concludes that the parameter, time, plays the most significant role in the estimation of infiltration rate. Comparison of results suggests that there is no significant difference between conventional and soft-computing based infiltration models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angelaki, A., Sakellariou-Makrantonaki, M., and Tzimopoulos, C., (2013). “Theoretical and experimental research of cumulative infiltration.” Transport in Porous Media, Vol. 100, No. 2, pp. 247–257, DOI: 10.1007/s11242-013-0214-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes, C. and Vapnik, V. (1995). “Support-vector networks.” Machine Learning, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 273–297, DOI: 10.1007/BF00994018.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M. K., Asefa, T., Kemblowski, M. W., and McKee, M. (2006). “Soil moisture prediction using support vector machines.” JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 1033–1046, DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04512.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, W. H. and Ampt, G. (1911). “Studies on soil physics, 1. The flow of air and water through soils.” The Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol. 4, pp. 1–24, DOI: 10.1017/S0021859600001441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtan, H. N. (1961). Concept for infiltration estimates in watershed engineering. Agricultural Research Service, U.S Dept. of Agriculture, pp. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R. E. (1941). “An approach toward a physical interpretation of infiltration-capacity.” Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 5, No. C, pp. 399–417, DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1941.036159950005000c0075x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostiakov, A. N. (1932). “On the dynamics of the coefficient of waterpercolation in soils and on the necessity for studying it from a dynamic point of view for purposes of amelioration.” Trans, Vol. 6, pp. 17–21, https://doi.org/ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10011005232/en/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuss, M. (2006). Gaussian process models for robust regression, classification, and reinforcement learning, Doctoral dissertation, PhD thesis, Technische Universität, Darmstadt, pp. 189, https://doi.org/tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/id/eprint/674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaee, S., Zolfaghari, A. A., Gorji, M., Dyck, M., and Ghorbani Dashtaki, S. (2014). “Evaluation of infiltration models with different numbers of fitting parameters in different soil texture classes.” Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, Vol. 60, No. 5, pp. 681–693, DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2013.823477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, S. K., Tyagi, J. V., and Singh, V. P. (2003). “Comparison of infiltration models.” Hydrological Processes, Vol. 17, No. 13, pp. 2629–2652, DOI: 10.1002/hyp.1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal, M. and Foody, G. M. (2010). “Feature selection for classification of hyper spectral data by SVM.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 2297–2307, DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2039484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, D., Barahona-Palomo, M., Bolster, D., Sanchez-Vila, X., and Fernandez-Garcia, D. (2012). “A quick and inexpensive method to quantify spatially variable infiltration capacity for artificial recharge ponds using photographic images.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 430, pp. 118–126, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philips, J. R. (1957). “The theory of infiltration: The infiltration equation and its solution.” Soil Sci., Vol. 83, No. 5, pp. 345–358, DOI: 10.1097/00010694-195705000-00002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, C.E. and Williams, C.K., (2006). Gaussian processes for machine learning (Vol.1). MIT press, Cambridge, pp 248.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, W. J., Ahuja, L. R., Brakensiek, D. L., and Shirmohammadi, A. (1993). “Infiltration and soil water movement.” Handbook of Hydrology, D. Maidment, Ed., McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L. A. (1931). “Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums.” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 318–333, DOI: 10.1063/1.1745010.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sihag, P., Tiwari, N. K., and Ranjan, S. (2017a). “Estimation and intercomparison of infiltration models.” Water Science, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 34–43, DOI: 10.1016/j.wsj.2017.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sihag, P., Tiwari, N. K., and Ranjan, S. (2017b). “Modelling of infiltration of sandy soil using Gaussian process regression.” Modelling Earth Systems and Environment, pp. 1091–1100, DOI: 10.1007/s40808-017-0357-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sihag, P., Tiwari, N. K., and Ranjan, S. (2017c). “Prediction of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS).” ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, pp. 1–11, DOI: 10.1080/09715010.2017.1381861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B., Sihag, P., and Singh, K. (2017). “Modelling of impact of water quality on infiltration rate of soil by random forest regression.” Modelling Earth Systems and Environment, pp. 999–1004, DOI: 10.1007/s40808-017-0347-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. P. and Yu, F. X. (1990). “Derivation of infiltration equation using systems approach.” Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vol. 116, No. 6, pp. 837–858, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE) 0733-9437(1990)116:6(837).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smola, A. J. (1996). Regression estimation with support vector learning machines, Doctoral dissertation, Master’s thesis, Technische Universität München, pp. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sy, N. L. (2006). “Modelling the infiltration process with a multi-layer perceptron artificial neural network.” Hydrological sciences journal, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 3–20, DOI: 10.1623/hysj.51.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, N. K., Sihag, P., and Ranjan, S. (2017). “Modeling of Infiltration of Soil using Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS).” Journal of Engineering & Technology Education, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Üstün, B., Melssen, W. J., and Buydens, L. M. (2006). “Facilitating the application of support vector regression by using a universal Pearson VII function based kernel.” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Vol. 81, No. 1, pp. 29–40, DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2005.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik, V. (1998). Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York, pp. 768. https://doi.org/www.cs.waikato.ac.nz

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yusof, K. W., Babangida, N. M., Mustafa, M. R., and Isa, M. H. (2017). “Linear kernel support vector machines for modelling pore-water pressure responses.” Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 12, No. 8, pp. 2202–2212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolfaghari, A. A., Mirzaee, S., and Gorji, M. (2012). “Comparison of different models for estimating cumulative infiltration.” International Journal of Soil Science, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 108, DOI: 10.3923/ijss.2012.108.115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Sepah Vand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vand, A.S., Sihag, P., Singh, B. et al. Comparative Evaluation of Infiltration Models. KSCE J Civ Eng 22, 4173–4184 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-1347-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-1347-1

Keywords

Navigation