Skip to main content
Log in

Nutritional Evaluation of Shoots of Two Rattans of Northeast India—Calamus flagellum Griff. ex Mart. and C. floribundus Griff. (Arecaceae)1

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Literature Cited

  • AOAC. 2005. Official methods of analysis, 18th edition. Dr. William Horwitz and Dr. George W. Latimer, Jr., eds., AOAC International, Maryland, USA. (Revision–1, 2006) Chapter 4.65.

  • APHA (American Public Health Association). 1992. American Public Health Association, 1992, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Edition. Test method: 3030 D–J.

  • Atchley, A. A. 1984. Nutritional value of palms. Principes 28(3):138–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S. K. 1986. Threatened palms of India—Some case studies. Journal of Economic Taxonomic Botany 7:493–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonde, S. D., V. A. Vaishali, and D. K. Kulkarni. 1990. Nutritional composition of the fruits of Doum Palms (Hyphane) from the West Coast of India. Principes 34:21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caius, J. F. 1935. The medicinal and poisonous palms of India. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 37:917–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chongtham, N., M. S. Bisht, and S. Haorongbam. 2011. Nutritional properties of bamboo shoots: Potential and prospects for utilization as a health food. Food Science and Food Safety 10(3):153–168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E. J. H. 1966. The natural history of palms. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T. 2002. The status of the rattan sectors in Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Vietnam and Cambodia with an emphasis on cane supply. Pages 115–144 in J. Dransfield, F. O. Tesoro, and N. Manokaran, eds., Nonwood Forest Products 14. Rattan: Current research issues and prospects for conservation and sustainable Development. FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— and K. Sengdala. 2002. The adoption of rattan cultivation for edible shoot production in Lao PDR and Thailand—From non timber forest product to cash crop. Economic Botany 56(2):147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heamakarn, S. 2000. An able cane. http://www.ecologyasia.com/news–archives/2000/nov–00/bangkokpost_191100_Outlook01.htm (accessed on 18 June 2013)

  • Hu, C. 1987. The changes in nutrient composition of bamboo shoots at different ages. Recent research on bamboos: Proceedings of the International Bamboo workshop, 1985, Hangzhou, China. Chinese Academy of Forestry and IDRC, Canada, 304–308.

  • Johnson, D., ed., and the IUCN/SSC Palm Specialist Group. 1996. Palms: Their conservation and sustained utilization. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K.: IUCN.

  • Mayer, J. 1989. Rattan cultivation, family economy and land use: A case from Pasir, East Kalimantan. Report of German Forestry Group, Mulawarman University 13:39–53.

  • Renuka, C. 1996. Rattans of North eastern India—A cause for great concern. Arunachal Pradesh Forest News 14(2):8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— and J. P. Thomas. 2006. An evaluation of the nutrient contents of the edible shoots of four species of rattans from India. Journal of Non–Timber Forest Products 13(3):173–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ———, and P. Rugmini. 2007a. Effects of light on the growth and production of edible shoots of rattans. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 19(3):164–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ———, and ———. 2007b. Cultivation of rattan for edible shoots—A source of additional income for the farmers of the Western Ghats. Kerala Forest Research Institute Research Report 1127:49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastry, C. 2002. Rattan in the twenty–first century: An outlook. Pages 9–22 in J. Dransfield, F. O. Tesoro, and N. Manokaran, eds., Rattan: Current Research Issues and Progress for Conservation and sustainable Development. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundriyal, M. and R. C. Sundriyal. 2001. Wild edible plants of Sikkim Himalaya: Nutritive values of selective species. Economic Botany 55(3):377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA. 2012. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 25 available from http://www.ars.usda.gov/services/docs.htm?docid=8964 (28 May 2013).

  • Wealth of India—An Encyclopedia of India’s Raw Material Resources, 1948–1976. New Delhi, India: National Institute of Science, Communication and Information Resource (CSIR).

  • Xu, H., Z. Z. Zhou, and G. Yin. 1991. Nutrition evaluation of shoots of two rattan species. Rattan Information Centre Bulletin 10(1):17–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support from Indian Council of Forestry Research & Education (ICFRE), Dehradun is gratefully acknowledged. The author is thankful to the Director of RFRI for wholehearted support and encouragement. The nutrient analysis was done in the FICCI Research and Analysis Centre, New Delhi. The author is grateful to Professor Dr. K. R. Shivanna, INSA honorary Scientist, ATREE, Bangalore, and Dr. C. Renuka, Scientist (Rt.), KFRI, Peechi, Kerala, for their valuable comments. Thanks are due to Sh. A. C. Lakshmana IFS, (Rt.), and Prof. Dr. C. R. Nagendran, Mysore for useful suggestions. I would like to express my appreciation to Dr. V. B. Sreekumar, Scientist, KFRI, Peechi for sharing literatures. Sincere gratitude goes to the anonymous reviewers for their thorough and constructive feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. N. Manohara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manohara, T.N. Nutritional Evaluation of Shoots of Two Rattans of Northeast India—Calamus flagellum Griff. ex Mart. and C. floribundus Griff. (Arecaceae)1 . Econ Bot 67, 263–268 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-013-9237-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-013-9237-4

Key Words

Navigation