Skip to main content
Log in

In-vehicle technology for self-driving cars: Advantages and challenges for aging drivers

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of self-driving cars or autonomous vehicles has progressed at an unanticipated pace. Ironically, the driver or the driver-vehicle interaction is a largely neglected factor in the development of enabling technologies for autonomous vehicles. Therefore, this paper discusses the advantages and challenges faced by aging drivers with reference to in-vehicle technology for self-driving cars, on the basis of findings of recent studies. We summarize age-related characteristics of sensory, motor, and cognitive functions on the basis of extensive age-related research, which can provide a familiar to better aging drivers. Furthermore, we discuss some key aspects that need to be considered, such as familar to learnability, acceptance, and net effectiveness of new in-vehicle technology, as addressed in relevant studies. In addition, we present research-based examples on aging drivers and advanced technology, including a holistic approach that is being developed by MIT AgeLab, advanced navigation systems, and health monitoring systems. This paper anticipates many questions that may arise owing to the interaction of autonomous technologies with an older driver population. We expect the results of our study to be a foundation for further developments toward the consideration of needs of aging drivers while designing self-driving vehicles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AARP:

american association of retired persons

ACC:

adaptive cruise control

ADAS:

advanced driver assistance system

AGNES:

age gain now empathy system

ATIS:

advanced traveler information system

FCW:

forward collision warning

HUD:

head-up display

IEEE:

institute of electrical and electronics engineers

IT:

interaction time

IVNS:

in-vehicle navigation system

LKAS:

lane keeping assistance system

NT:

neglect time

NVE:

night vision enhancement

SPAS:

smart parking assistance system

UAV:

unmanned aerial vehicle

References

  • AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety (2008). Use of Advanced In-Vehicle Technology by Young and Older Early Adopters. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety Report. DOT-HS-810-828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. L. (2002). Designing in-vehicle technologies for older drivers: Application of sensory-cognitive interaction theory. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 3,4, 307–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blocker Jr, W. P. (1992). Maintaining functional independence by mobilizing the aged. Geriatrics 47,1, 42, 48–50, 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boot, W. R., Nichols, T. A., Rogers, W. A. and Fisk, A. D. (2012). Design for aging. in Salvendy, G., Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons. New York. 1409–1471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredereke, J. and Lankenau, A. (2002). A rigorous view of mode confusion. Proc. 21st Safecomp Int. Conf., 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, W., Ickenroth, J., Ponds, R. and Van Wolffelaar, P. (1990). Divided attention in old age: Difficulty in integrating skills. European Perspectives in Psychology, 2, 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caird, J. (2004). In-vehicle intelligent transportation systems: Safety and mobility of older drivers. Proc. 27, TRB Conf., 236–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. J. Educational Psychology 54,1, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corso, J. F. (1981). Aging Sensory Systems and Perception. Praeger. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotté, N., Meyer, J. and Coughlin, J. F. (2001). Older and younger drivers’ reliance on collision warning systems. Proc. HFES Annual Meeting 45,4, 277–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, J. F. (2001). Beyond Health and Retirement: Placing Transportation on the Aging Policy Agenda. MIT AgeLab Tech Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, J. F. and Reimer, B. (2006). New demands from an older population: An integrated approach to defining the future of older driver safety. Proc. SAE Convergence Conf., Detroit, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, J. F., Reimer, B. and Mehler, B. (2009). Driver Wellness, Safety & the Development of an Awarecar. MIT AgeLab Tech Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, J. W. and Cummings, M. L. (2007). Identifying predictive metrics for supervisory control of multiple robots. IEEE Trans. Robotics 23,5, 942–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, M. L. and Mitchell, P. J. (2008). Predicting controller capacity in supervisory control of multiple UAVs. IEEE-Part A: Systems and Humans 38,2, 451–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingus, T. A., Hulse, M. C., Mollenhauer, M. A., Fleischman, R. N., Mcgehee, D, V. and Manakkal, N. (1997). Effects of age, system experience, and navigation technique on driving with an advanced traveler information system. Human Factors 39,2, 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eby, D. W. and Molnar, L. J. (2012). Cognitive impairment and driving safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 49, 261–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilebrecht, D. I. B., Wartzek, D. I. T., Lem, D. I. J. and Vogt, P. D. R. (2011). Capacitive electrocardiogram measurement system in the driver seat. ATZ Worldwide eMagazines 113,3, 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson, C., Guo, A. W., Blythe, P. and Namdeo, A. (2012). In-vehicle navigation systems and older drivers. 19th ITS World Cong., Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, A. (2013). Cars that can monitor your health. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/road-safety/10013373/Cars-that-can-monitor-your-health.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Fozard, J. L., Vercryssen, M., Reynolds, S. L., Hancock, P. A. and Quilter, R. E. (1994). Age differences and changes in reaction time: The baltimore longitudinal study of aging. J. Gerontology 49,4, 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gescheider, G. A., Bolanowski, S., Hall, K., Hoffman, K. and Verrillo, R. (1994). The effects of aging on information-processing channels in the sense of touch: I. Absolute sensitivity. Somatosensory and Motor Research 11,4, 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gish, K. W., Shoulson, M. and Perel, M. (2002). Driver behavior and performance using an infrared night vision enhancement system. 81st TRB Meeting, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groeger, J. A. (1999). Expectancy and Control: Perceptual and Cognitive Aspects of the Driving Task., in Hancock, P. A., Human Performance and Ergonomics. Academic Press. 243–264.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haddon Jr, W. (1972). A logical framework for categorizing highway safety phenomena and activity. J. Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 12,3, 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakamies-Blomqvist, L. (1996). Research on older drivers: A review. IATSS Research, 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkins, S. W. and Chapman, C. R. (1977). The perception of induced dental pain in young and elderly women. J. Gerontology 32,4, 428–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L. L. and Hay, J. F. (1998). Age-related deficits in memory: Theory and application. Theories of Memory, 2, Psychology Press, 111–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. N. and Pritchett, A. R. (1995). Experimental Study of Vertical Flight Path Mode Awareness. ICAT Report No. ASL-95-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Wogalter, M. S. and Mayhorn, C. B. (2010). Older and younger drivers’ beliefs about motor vehicle features to benefit their safe driving. Proc. HFES Annual Meeting 54,2, 160–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberger, U. and Baltes, P. B. (1994). Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: A strong connection. Psychology and Aging 9,3, 339–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llaneras, R., Lerner, N., Dingus, T. and Moyer, J. (2000). Attention demand of IVIS auditory displays: An on-road study under freeway environments. Proc. HFES Annual Meeting 44,20, 238–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malfetti, J. L. and Winter, D. J. (1986). Drivers 55 plus: Test your own performance. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, M. and Shinar, D. (2004). Imperfect in-vehicle collision avoidance warning systems can aid drivers. Human Factors 46,2, 357–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, A., Ross, T. and Osman, Z. (2005). The design of next generation in-vehicle navigation systems for the older driver. Interacting with Computers 17,6, 643–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, U., Spieler, D. and Kliegl, R. (2001). Ageing and executive control: Introduction to this special issue. European J. Cognitive Psychology 13,1/2, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehler, B., Reimer, B. and Coughlin, J. F. (2012). Sensitivity of physiological measures for detecting systematic variations in cognitive demand from a working memory task an on-road study across three age groups. Human Factors 54,3, 396–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melenhorst, A., Rogers, W. A. and Caylor, E. C. (2001). The use of communication technologies by older adults: Exploring the benefits from the user’s perspective. Proc. HFES Annual Meeting 45,3, 221–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. (2004). Personal vehicle transportation. The National Academies Press. 253–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihal, W. L. and Barrett, G. V. (1976). Individual differences in perceptual information processing and their relation to automobile accident involvement. J. Applied Psychology 61,2, 229–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, D., Carver, L. M., Leirer, V. O. and Tanke, E. D. (2000). Medication schemas and memory for automated telephone messages. Human Factors 42,4, 523–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, K. (2011). Ford Sees Sales Surge With New Diabetes-to-Heart Dashboard: Cars. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-05-26/ford-sees-salessurge-with-new-diabetes-to-heart-dashboard-cars.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehme, C. E. (2009). Modeling Human Supervisory Control in Heterogeneous Unmanned Vehicle Systems. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehme, C. E., Crandall, J. W. and Cummings, M. L. (2008). Using discrete-event simulation to model situational awareness of unmanned-vehicle operators. Proc. Virginia Modeling, Analysis and Simulation Center Capstone Conf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (2003). Interaction design for automobile interiors. http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/interaction_design_f.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen Jr., D. R. and Wood, S. B. (2004). Fan-out: Measuring human control of multiple robots. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Vienna, Austria, 231–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planek, T. W. (1972). The aging driver in today’s traffic: A critical review. North Carolina Symp. Highway Safety, Chapel Hill, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponds, R. W., Brouwer, W. H. and Van Wolffelaar, P. C. (1988). Age differences in divided attention in a simulated driving task. J. Gerontology 43,6, 151–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, R. (2012). IEEE Says That 75% Of Vehicles Will Be Autonomous By 2040. http://www.thecarconnection.com/news/1079261_ieee-says-that-75-of-vehicles-willbe-autonomous-by-2040

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, B., Coughlin, J. F. and Mehler, B. (2009). Development of a driver aware vehicle for monitoring, managing & motivating older operator behavior. ITSAmerica’s 2009 Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, B., Donmez, B., Lavallière, M., Mehler, B., Coughlin, J. F. and Teasdale, N. (2013). Impact of age and cognitive demand on lane choice and changing under actual highway conditions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 52, 125–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, B., Mehler, B. and Coughlin, J. F. (2010). An Evaluation of Driver Reactions to New Vehicle Parking Assist Technologies Developed to Reduce Driver Stress. MIT AgeLab Tech Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, B., Puleo, R., D’Ambrosio, L., Coughlin, J. Cichon, J. and Griffith, D. (2006). Driver Flexibility: The Impact of Age on Rotation. Currently under Review, MIT AgeLab Tech Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, S. M., Pham, D. L., Kraut, M. A., Zonderman, A. B. and Davatzikos, C. (2003). Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies of older adults: a shrinking brain. J. Neuroscience 23,8, 3295–3301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudi, D. R. and Ingrid, P. K. (2000). The relationship between cognitive/neuropsychological factors and car driving performance in older adults. J. American Geriatrics Society 48,12, 1644–1668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudin-Brown, C. M. and Parker, H. A. (2004). Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): Implications for preventive strategies. Transportation Research Part F 7,2, 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A. (1987). Adult age differences in integrative spatial ability. Psychology and Aging 2,3, 254–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvendy, G. (2012). Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons. New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen, S. A. and Niemeier, D. A. (2001). Integrating vehicle design and human factors: minimizing elderly driving constraints. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 9,3, 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, N. A. and Young, M. S. (2005). Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control. Ergonomics 48,10, 1294–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Korea (2004). Elderly Statistics, Statistics Korea Technical Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trei, M. (2011). Smart steering wheel checks your vital signs as you drive. http://www.dvice.com/archives/2011/11/smart_steering.php

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrkljan, B. H. and Polgar, J. M. (2007). Linking occupational participation and occupational identity: An exploratory study of the transition from driving to driving cessation in older adulthood. J. Occupational Science 14,1, 30–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, P. F. (1991). The older driver. Human Factors 33,5, 499–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D., Lee, J. D., Liu, Y. and Gordon, S. E. (2008). An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering. 2nd edn. Pearson. Upper Saddle River. New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, G. J. (1988). Risk homeostasis theory and traffic accidents: propositions, deductions and discussion of dissension in recent reactions. Ergonomics 31,4, 441–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yick, K. (2003). Design and Test of Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems for Automobiles. M.S. Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelazo, P. D., Craik, F. I. and Booth, L. (2004). Executive function across the life span. Acta Psychologica 115,2, 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, J., Coughlin, J.F. In-vehicle technology for self-driving cars: Advantages and challenges for aging drivers. Int.J Automot. Technol. 15, 333–340 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-014-0034-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-014-0034-6

Key Words

Navigation