Skip to main content
Log in

Histopathological Comparison of Mosquito Net with Polypropylene Mesh for Hernia Repair: An Experimental Study in Rats

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Use of mosquito net, in place of polypropylene mesh, had been reported for tension-free hernia repair, as a better cost-effective option. This experimental histopathological study was performed in rats to find out the tissue response and the foreign body reaction and its comparison between commercial polypropylene mesh and the sterilized mosquito net. This experimental study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, Government NSCB, Medical College, Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh), India. It was carried out in 40 albino rats. A 1.5 × 0.5-cm hernial defect was created by excising full-thickness abdominal wall muscle. All rats underwent on-lay mesh repair of hernial defect (polypropylene mesh, n = 20; mosquito net, n = 20). Half of rats in each group were sacrificed on day 14, and the other half, on day 90. Sections of containing mesh were examined histopathologically for inflammatory infiltrate, giant cells, and collagen deposition. Mosquito net group showed significantly greater number of giant cells and inflammatory cells at 14 and 90 days (p < 0.0001, p < 0.001, p < 0.05, and p < 0.001, respectively), as compared to polypropylene group. Grades of collagen fiber deposition were almost equal in both groups, both at 14 and 90 days (p > 0.05 and p > 0.05, respectively). Results of mosquito net are comparable to conventional polypropylene mesh. In a setup, where cost-effectiveness is of primary importance, use of mosquito net for tension-free hernia repair can be an acceptable alternative as proven histologically, to commercially available polypropylene mesh.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM (1989) The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 157(2):188–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tongaonkar RR, Reddy BV, Mehta VK, Singh NS, Shivade S (2003) Preliminary multicentric trial of cheap indigenous mosquito-net cloth for tension-free hernia repair. Ind J Surg 65(1):89–95

    Google Scholar 

  3. Freudenberg S, Sano D, Ouangré E, Weiss C, Wilhelm TJ (2006) Commercial mesh versus nylon mosquito net for hernia repair. A randomized double-blind study in Burkina Faso. World J Surg 30(10):1784–1789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke MG, Oppong C, Simmermacher R, Park K, Kurzer M, Vanotoo L, Kingsnorth AN (2009) The use of sterilised polyester mosquito net mesh for inguinal hernia repair in Ghana. Hernia 13(2):155–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shillcutt SD, Clarke MG, Kingsnorth AN (2010) Cost-effectiveness of groin hernia surgery in the Western Region of Ghana. Arch Surg 145(10):954–961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang J, Papandria D, Rhee D, Perry H, Abdullah F (2011) Low-cost mesh for inguinal hernia repair in resource-limited settings. Hernia 15(5):485–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shah SR, Abhayankar AB, Mathur SK (1996) Mesh laparostomy—a comparison between polypropylene mesh and indigenous nylon net. Trop Gastroenterol 17(2):49–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hodges AM (2001) Fishing line: a valuable suture material. Trop Doct 31:98–99

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Misra MC, Kumar S, Bansal VK (2008) Total extraperitoneal (TEP) mesh repair of inguinal hernia in the developing world: comparison of low-cost indigenous balloon dissection versus direct telescopic dissection: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc 22(9):1947–1958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parulkar BG, Mathur SK, Supe AN, Samsi AB, Vora IM (1986) Use of indigenous knitted nylon mesh to repair large abdominal defects—an experimental study. J Postgrad Med 32(4):214–218

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilhelm TJ, Freudenberg S, Jonas E, Grobholz R, Post S, Kyamanywa P (2007) Sterilized mosquito net versus commercial mesh for hernia repair. An experimental study in goats in Mbarara/Uganda. Eur Surg Res 39(5):312–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Champault G, Bernard C, Rizk N, Polliand C (2007) Inguinal hernia repair: the choice of prosthesis outweighs that of technique. Hernia 11(2):125–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Paajanen H (2007) A single-surgeon randomized trial comparing three composite meshes on chronic pain after Lichtenstein hernia repair in local anesthesia. Hernia 11(4):335–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Alam F, Tang TY, Walsh SR, Sadat U (2010) Partially or completely absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh repair for inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20(4):213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanders DL, Kingsnorth AN, Stephenson BM (2013) Mosquito net mesh for abdominal wall hernioplasty: a comparison of material characteristics with commercial prosthetics. World J Surg 37(4):737–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stephenson BM, Kingsnorth AN (2011) Safety and sterilization of mosquito net mesh for humanitarian inguinal hernioplasty. World J Surg 35(9):1957–1960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sørensen CG, Rosenberg J (2012) The use of sterilized mosquito nets for hernioplasty: a systematic review. Hernia 16(6):621–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Simmons D (2008) The use of animal models in studying genetic disease: transgenesis and induced mutation. Nat Educ 1(1)

Download references

Acknowledgments

We give thanks to Dr. B. Reddy for providing sterilized mosquito net.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepti Bala Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, M., Sharma, D.B., Chandrakar, S.K. et al. Histopathological Comparison of Mosquito Net with Polypropylene Mesh for Hernia Repair: An Experimental Study in Rats. Indian J Surg 77 (Suppl 2), 511–514 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-013-0904-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-013-0904-6

Keywords

Navigation