Abstract
Maintaining suitable indoor climate conditions is a need for the occupants’ well being, while requiring very strictly thermal comfort conditions and very high levels of indoor air quality in buildings represents also a high expense of energy, with its consequence in terms of environmental impact and cost. In fact, it is well known that the indoor environmental quality (IEQ), considering both thermal and indoor air quality aspects, has a primary impact not only on the perceived human comfort, but also on the building energy consumption. This issue is clearly expressed by the European Energy Performance of Buildings Directive 2002/92/EC, together with the most recent 2010/31/EU, which underlines that the expression of a judgment about the energy consumption of a building should be always joint with the corresponding indoor environmental quality level required by occupants. To this aim, the concept of indoor environment categories has been introduced in the EN 15251 standard. These categories range from I to III, where category I refers to the highest level of indoor climate requirement. In the challenge of reducing the environmental impact for air conditioning in buildings, it is essential that IEQ requirements are relaxed in order to widen the variations of the temperature ranges and ventilation air flow rates. In this paper, by means of building energy simulation, the heating and cooling energy demand are calculated for a mechanically controlled office building where different indoor environmental quality levels are required, ranging from category I to category III of EN 15251. The building is located in different European cities (Moscow, Torino and Athens), characterized by significantly different wheatear conditions. The mutual relation between heating and cooling energy demand and the required levels of IEQ is highlighted. The simulations are performed on a typical office room which is adopted as a reference in validation tests of the European Standard EN 15265 to validate calculation procedures of energy use for space heating and cooling.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ansaldi R, Corgnati SP, Filippi M (2009). Assessment of the indoor thermal quality: methodology and application. In: Drury, EK, Pridgen TS (eds), Handbook on Environmental Quality. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
van der Linden AC, Boerstra AC, Raue AK, Kurvers SR, de Dear RJ (2006). Adaptive temperature limits: A new guideline in The Netherlands: A new approach for the assessment of building performance with respect to thermal indoor climate. Energy and Buildings, 38: 8–17.
Brager GS, de Dear RJ (2000). A standard for natural ventilation. ASHRAE Journal, 42(10): 21–27.
Brager GS, de Dear RJ (1998a). Thermal adaptation in the built environment: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 27: 83–96.
Brager GS, de Dear RJ (1998b). Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference. ASHRAE Transactions, 104(1): 145–167.
Corgnati SP, Fabrizio E, Filippi M (2008). The impact of indoor thermal conditions, system controls and building types on the building energy demand. Energy and Buildings, 40: 627–636.
Crawley DB, Lawrie LK, Winkelmannc FC, Buhlc WF, Huangc YJ, Pedersend CO, Strandd RK, Liesend RJ, Fishere DE, Wittef MJ, Glazerf J (2001). EnergyPlus: Creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy and Buildings, 33: 319–331.
Directive 2002/91/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings. Directive 2010/31/UE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast).
EN 15251 (2008). Criteria for the Indoor Environment including thermal, indoor air quality, light and noise. European Standard.
EN 15265 (2008). Energy performance of buildings—Calculation of energy needs for space heating and cooling using dynamic methods—General criteria and validation procedures. European Standard.
EnergyPlus Reference Manual (2010). http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus/energyplus_documentation.cfm
Fabrizio E, Corgnati SP, Causone F, Filippi M., Schiavio L (2010). Contrasting the energy and comfort performance of radiant heating and cooling system vs. all air systems by numerical simulation. Paper presented in the 10th REHVA World Congress: Sustainable Energy Use in Building, Turkey.
Fanger PO (1970). Thermal Comfort Analyses and Applications in Environmental Engineering. London: McGraw-Hill.
Karlsson F, Moshfeg B (2006). Energy demand and indoor climate in a low energy building—changed control strategies and boundary conditions. Energy and Buildings, 38: 315–326.
Olesen BW (2007). The philosophy behind EN 15251: Indoor environmental criteria for design and calculation of energy performance of buildings. Energy and Buildings, 39: 740–749.
Ouyang J, Hokao K (2009). Energy-saving potential by improving occupants’ behavior in urban residential sector in Hangzhou City, China. Energy and Buildings, 41: 711–720.
Seppänen O (2010). Technical regulations to control energy efficiency of buildings in some EU Member States. Paper presented in the 3rd International Conference Palenc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corgnati, S.P., Fabrizio, E., Raimondo, D. et al. Categories of indoor environmental quality and building energy demand for heating and cooling. Build. Simul. 4, 97–105 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-011-0023-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-011-0023-x