Abstract
This article reviews various non-mass-like ultrasonography (US) findings of the breast and the sonographic-pathologic correlation with Doppler techniques, elastography, and MRI. High-resolution US allows for identification of small, clinically occult non-mass-like US findings. Ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive lobular carcinoma usually manifest as a non-mass-like lesion on US. It is useful to classify non-mass-like lesions on US in a similar manner to the classification of non-mass-like enhancement on MRI.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Kao E. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Radiology. 2009;252:665–72.
American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.
Moon WK, Myung JS, Lee YJ, Park IA, Noh DY, Im JG. US of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics. 2002;22:269–81.
Japan Association of Breast and Thyroid Sonography. Guideline for breast ultrasound-management and diagnosis. Japan: Tokyo; 2004.
Gwak YJ, Kim HJ, Kwak JY, et al. Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation. Acta Radiol. 2011;52:364–71.
Tohno E, Ueno E. Ultrasound (US) diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2005;12:267–71.
Sotome K, Yamamoto Y, Hirano A, et al. The role of contrast enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of non-mass-image-forming lesions on breast ultrasonography. Breast Cancer. 2007;14:371–80.
Stoblen F, Landt S, Ishaq R, et al. High-frequency breast ultrasound for the detection of microcalcifications and associated masses in BI-RADS 4a patients. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:2575–81.
Hsu HH, Yu JC, Hsu GC, et al. Ultrasonographic alterations associated with the dilatation of mammary ducts: feature analysis and BI-RADS assessment. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:293–302.
Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH, et al. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography. Acta Radiol. 2009;50:602–9.
Takei J, Tsunoda-Shimizu H, Kikuchi M, et al. Clinical implications of architectural distortion visualized by breast ultrasonography. Breast Cancer. 2009;16:132–5.
Yamada T, Mori N, Watanabe M, et al. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics. 2010;30:1183–98.
Uematsu T, Kasami M, Uchida Y, et al. Ultrasonographically guided 18-gauge automated core needle breast biopsy with post-fire needle position verification (PNPV). Breast Cancer. 2007;14:219–28.
Gong X, Xu Q, Xu Z, Xiong P, Yan W, Chen Y. Real-time elastography for the differential of benign and malignant breast lesions: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;130:11–8. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1745-2.
Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;239:341–50.
Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Ollivier L, Thibault F, Khoury C, Neuenschwander S. How to optimize breast ultrasound. Eur J Radiol. 2009;69:6–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Uematsu, T. Non-mass-like lesions on breast ultrasonography: a systematic review. Breast Cancer 19, 295–301 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-012-0364-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-012-0364-z