Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of landslide susceptibility maps using logistic regression, frequency ratio, decision tree, weights of evidence and artificial neural network

  • Published:
Geosciences Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the purpose of comparing susceptibility mapping methods in Mizunami City, Japan, the landslide inventory was partitioned into three groups as various training and test datasets to identify the most appropriate method for creating a landslide susceptibility map. A total of fifteen landslide susceptibility maps were produced using frequency ratio, logistic regression, decision tree, weights of evidence and artificial neural network models, and the results were assessed using existing test landside points and areas under the relative operative characteristic curve (AUC). The validation results indicated that the logistic regression model could provide the highest AUC value (0.865), and a relatively high percentage of landslide points fell in the high and very high landslide susceptibility classes in this study. Furthermore, the paper also suggested that the model performances would be increased if appropriate landslide points were used for the calculation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayalew, L. and Yamagishi, H., 2005, The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakudayahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology, 65, 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althuwaynee, O.F., Pradhan, B., Park, H.J., and Lee, J.H., 2014, A novel ensemble bivariate statistical evidential belief function with knowledge-based analytical hierarchy process and multivariate statistical logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping. Cantena, 114, 21–36. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2013.10.011

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, S.B., Wang, J., Guo, N.L., Zhou, P.G., Hou, S.S., and Xu, S.N., 2010, GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping of the Zhongxian segment in the Three Gorgesarea, China. Geomorphology, 115, 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui, D.T., Pradhan, B., Lorfman, O., Revhaug, I., and Dick, O.B, 2012, Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam: A comparison of the Levenberg–Marquardt and Bayesian regularized neural networks. Geomorphology, 171–172, 12–29. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.04.023

    Google Scholar 

  • Conforti, M., Pascale, S., Robustelli, G., and Sdao, F., 2014, Evaluation of prediction capability of the artificial neural networks for mapping landslide susceptibility in the Turbolo River catchment (northern Calabria, Italy). Cantena, 113, 236–250. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2013.08.006

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, I., Sahoo, S., Van Westen, C., Stein, A., and Hack, R., 2010, Landslide susceptibility assessment using logistic regression and its comparison with a rock mass classification system, along a road section in the northern Himalayas (India). Geomorphology, 114, 627–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, T., 2006, An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27, 861–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felicisimo, A., Cuartero, A., Remondo, J., and Quiros, E., 2013, Mapping landslide susceptibility with logistic regression, multiple adaptive regression splines, classification and regression trees, and maximum entropy methods: a comparative study. Landslides, 10, 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, S.K., Singh, M., Kapur, P., Sharma, B.K., and Shamshi, M.A., 2008, Design and development of instrument network for landslide monitoring, an issue an early warning. Journal of Scientific & Industrial research, 67, 361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandi, A. and Shakoor, A., 2010, A GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses. Engineering Geology, 110, 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nefeslioglu, H.A., Gokceoglu, C., and Sonmez, H., 2008, An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps. Engineering Geology, 97, 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhauser, B., Damm, B., and Terhorst, B., 2011, GIS-based assessment of landslide susceptibility on the base of the weights of evidence model. Landslides, 9, 511–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourani, V., Pradhan, B., Ghaffari, H., and Sharifi, S.S., 2014, Landslide susceptibility mapping at Zonouz Plain, Iran using genetic programming and comparison with frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Natural Hazards, 71, 523–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. and Talib, J.A., 2005, Probabilistic landslide susceptibility and factor effect analysis. Environmental Geology, 47, 982–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, H.J., Lee, S., and Soedradjat, G., 2010, Quantitative landslide susceptibility mapping at Pemalang area, Indonesia. Environmental Earth Sciences, 60, 1317–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir, A. and Altural, T., 2013, A comparative study of frequency ratio, weights of evidence and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping: Sultan Mountains, SW Turkey. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 64, 180–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poudyal, C.P., Chang, C., Oh, H.J., and Lee, S., 2010, Landslide susceptibility maps comparing frequency ratio and artificial neural networks: a case study from the Nepal Himalaya. Environmental Earth Sciences, 61, 1049–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, B., 2010a, Landslide susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 38, 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, B., 2010b, Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide hazard analysis and cross validation using multivariate logistic regression model on three test areas in Malaysia. Advances in Space Research, 45, 1244–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, B., 2013, A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Computers & Geosciences, 51, 350–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, B. and Lee, S., 2010a, Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environmental Earth Sciences, 60, 1037–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, B. and Lee, S., 2010b, Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: back-propagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25, 747–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, B., Lee, S., and Buchroithner, M.F., 2010, A GIS-based back-propagation neural network model and its cross application and validation for landslide susceptibility analyses. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34, 216–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regmi, N.R., Giardino, J.R., and Vitek, J.D., 2010a, Assessing susceptibility to landslide: Using models to understand observed changes in slopes. Geomorphology, 122, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regmi, N.R., Giardino, J.R., and Vitek, J.D., 2010b, Modeling susceptibility to landslides using the weight of evidence approach: western Colorado, USA. Geomorphology, 115, 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito, H., Nakayama, D., and Matsuyama, H., 2009, Comparison of landslide susceptibility based on a decision tree model and actual landslide occurrence: The Akaishi Mountains, Japan. Geomorphology, 109, 108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabi, H., Hhezri, S., Ahmhad, B.B., and Hashim, M., 2014, Landslide susceptibility mapping at central Zab basin, Iran: A comparison between analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Catena, 115, 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahidnia, M.H., Alesheikh, A.A., Alimohammadi, A., and Hosseinali, F., 2010, A GIS-based neuro-fuzzy procedure for integrating knowledge and data in landslide susceptibility mapping. Computers & Geosciences, 36, 1101–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen, C.J., Rengers, N., and Soeters, R., 2003, Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Natural Hazards, 30, 399–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnes, D.J., 1978, Slope movements: types and processes. In: Schuster, R.L. and Krizek, R.J. (eds.), Landslide analysis and control. National Academy of Sciences, Transportation Research Board Special Report 176, Washington, 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L.J., Sawada, K., and Moriguchi, S., 2013, Landslide susceptibility analysis with logistic regression model based on FCM sampling strategy. Computers & Geosciences, 57, 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, C., Xu, X., Dai, F., and Saraf, A., 2012, Comparison of different models for susceptibility mapping of earthquake triggered landslides related with the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. Computers & Geosciences, 46, 317–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin, A., 2008, GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistic in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of result and confirmations. Catena, 72, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin, A., Reis, S., Aydinoglu, A.C., and Yomralioglu, T., 2011, A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. Catena, 85, 274–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeon, Y.-K., Han, J.-G., and Ryu, K.H., 2010, Landslide susceptibility mapping in Injae, Korea, using a decision tree. Engineering Geology, 116, 274–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yesilnacar, E. and Topal, T., 2005, Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Engineering Geology, 79, 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, I., 2009, Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey). Computers & Geosciences, 35, 1125–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, I., 2010, Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine. Environmental Earth Sciences, 61, 821–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang-Jie Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, LJ., Guo, M., Sawada, K. et al. A comparative study of landslide susceptibility maps using logistic regression, frequency ratio, decision tree, weights of evidence and artificial neural network. Geosci J 20, 117–136 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-015-0026-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-015-0026-1

Key words

Navigation